津巴布韦农村残疾妇女:一个关键的女权主义残疾账户

IF 0.5 Q4 SOCIOLOGY South African Review of Sociology Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1080/21528586.2022.2137842
C. Dziva, Gretchen Erika Du Plessis
{"title":"津巴布韦农村残疾妇女:一个关键的女权主义残疾账户","authors":"C. Dziva, Gretchen Erika Du Plessis","doi":"10.1080/21528586.2022.2137842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Women with disabilities (WWD) in rural Zimbabwe are unable to enjoy fundamental rights and freedoms. The aim of this study was to capture the experiences of WWD in a rural setting. Inspired by critical feminist disability theory, this study conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 WWD (in particular, women with visual and physical impairments) in Mberengwa. Their stories demonstrate limited access to education, employment, information, land, and other productive resources. All of the research participants grappled with inaccessible public transport and buildings. Accessing grants, land, farming knowledge, funding for trade, water and toilet facilities became daily struggles. Contextual, socioeconomic, historic, and gendered power relations intersect to heavily limit their functioning. None of the research participants embraced victimhood, but instead resisted pity. Their push-back against abjection took various forms, such as attempting to earn an income, achieving reproductive aspirations, or working the land. Such actions, however, were often met with negative perceptions that equate disability with inability. Based on the findings, it is recommended that institutions responsible for WWD be restructured and better financed. In addition, the study calls for improved mainstreaming, advocacy and awareness-raising about the rights of WWD in rural Zimbabwe.","PeriodicalId":44730,"journal":{"name":"South African Review of Sociology","volume":"52 1","pages":"84 - 100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rural Women with Disabilities in Zimbabwe: A Critical Feminist Disability Account\",\"authors\":\"C. Dziva, Gretchen Erika Du Plessis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21528586.2022.2137842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Women with disabilities (WWD) in rural Zimbabwe are unable to enjoy fundamental rights and freedoms. The aim of this study was to capture the experiences of WWD in a rural setting. Inspired by critical feminist disability theory, this study conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 WWD (in particular, women with visual and physical impairments) in Mberengwa. Their stories demonstrate limited access to education, employment, information, land, and other productive resources. All of the research participants grappled with inaccessible public transport and buildings. Accessing grants, land, farming knowledge, funding for trade, water and toilet facilities became daily struggles. Contextual, socioeconomic, historic, and gendered power relations intersect to heavily limit their functioning. None of the research participants embraced victimhood, but instead resisted pity. Their push-back against abjection took various forms, such as attempting to earn an income, achieving reproductive aspirations, or working the land. Such actions, however, were often met with negative perceptions that equate disability with inability. Based on the findings, it is recommended that institutions responsible for WWD be restructured and better financed. In addition, the study calls for improved mainstreaming, advocacy and awareness-raising about the rights of WWD in rural Zimbabwe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Review of Sociology\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"84 - 100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Review of Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2022.2137842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Review of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2022.2137842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

津巴布韦农村的残疾妇女(WWD)无法享受基本权利和自由。这项研究的目的是捕捉在农村环境中WWD的经验。受批判性女权主义残疾理论的启发,本研究对Mberengwa的25名残疾妇女(特别是有视觉和身体障碍的妇女)进行了半结构化访谈。他们的故事表明,获得教育、就业、信息、土地和其他生产性资源的机会有限。所有的研究参与者都在与交通不便的公共交通和建筑作斗争。获得赠款、土地、农业知识、贸易资金、水和厕所设施成了日常的挣扎。背景、社会经济、历史和性别权力关系交织在一起,严重限制了它们的功能。没有一个研究参与者有受害者的感觉,而是拒绝怜悯。他们对落魄的反抗有各种形式,比如试图赚取收入,实现生育愿望,或者耕种土地。然而,这种行动往往受到把残疾等同于无能的消极看法。根据调查结果,建议对负责妇女权利的机构进行改组,并提供更好的资金。此外,该研究还呼吁加强对津巴布韦农村妇女权利的主流化、宣传和提高认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rural Women with Disabilities in Zimbabwe: A Critical Feminist Disability Account
ABSTRACT Women with disabilities (WWD) in rural Zimbabwe are unable to enjoy fundamental rights and freedoms. The aim of this study was to capture the experiences of WWD in a rural setting. Inspired by critical feminist disability theory, this study conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 WWD (in particular, women with visual and physical impairments) in Mberengwa. Their stories demonstrate limited access to education, employment, information, land, and other productive resources. All of the research participants grappled with inaccessible public transport and buildings. Accessing grants, land, farming knowledge, funding for trade, water and toilet facilities became daily struggles. Contextual, socioeconomic, historic, and gendered power relations intersect to heavily limit their functioning. None of the research participants embraced victimhood, but instead resisted pity. Their push-back against abjection took various forms, such as attempting to earn an income, achieving reproductive aspirations, or working the land. Such actions, however, were often met with negative perceptions that equate disability with inability. Based on the findings, it is recommended that institutions responsible for WWD be restructured and better financed. In addition, the study calls for improved mainstreaming, advocacy and awareness-raising about the rights of WWD in rural Zimbabwe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Guerrillas and combative mothers: women and the armed struggle in South Africa Menstruation and Society in South Africa: A Desktop Analysis Women from the South. Poetics of the Encounter with Asia and Africa “Fighting to Be a Real Man”: Constructions of Respectability and Contestations among African Migrant Men in Johannesburg Exploring Heteronormativity and the Illusion of the “Real Man”: A Case Study of Sivuyile (Siv) Ngesi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1