{"title":"较大与较小的异种:在印度次大陆的一种地方性慈鲷,橙色铬鱼的浅滩行为","authors":"S. Mallick, Heli J. Raval, R. Ghosal","doi":"10.1080/10236244.2022.2085571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the biological world, group formation and affiliation to group members is a fascinating area of research as it contributes toward understanding the behavioral strategies of an organism (Parrish and Edelstein-Keshet 1999). Several behavioral studies on animals have been conducted to observe and understand patterns of social group formation, and to investigate the group dynamics under different ecological contexts (Rodgers et al. 2011; Gómez-Laplaza 2012). Among the vertebrate model systems, fish taxa are a popular choice to understand group living behavior (Couzin and Krause 2003). Group living in the form of shoaling and schooling behavior in fishes have been studied in depth (Camacho-Cervantes et al., 2019; Pitcher 1986; Krause et al. 2002; Couzin and Krause 2003; Sumpter et al. 2008; Huntingford and Ruiz-Gomez 2009; Gómez-Laplaza 2012; Meuthen et al. 2016), and it still remains one of the intriguing areas of research in the field of behavioral sciences (Kareklas et al. 2017; Miller 2017; Pouca and Brown 2017). A shoal is defined as an aggregation where the shoaling members maintain a nearest neighbor distance of 3–4 body lengths among each other (Clark and Evans 1954; Pitcher and Parrish 1993). Shoals are more social in nature (Pitcher 1983), and shoaling patterns are influenced by several factors, for example, size of the shoal (Krause et al. 1996), dietary preference (Morrell et al. 2007), phenotypic characteristics (Wong and Rosenthal 2005), developmental stages (Lee-Jenkins and Godin 2010), sex (Ruhl and McRobert 2005), and species identity (Griffiths and Magurran 1997) of the shoaling partners, and availability of resources (Ward et al. 2005), presence or absence of predators (Chivers et al. 1995), and even on physical properties of the aquatic habitat (Ward et al. 2007). Shoaling preferences vary across conditions (McRobert and Bradner 1998; Ward and Hart 2003), and it is generally believed that phenotypically homogenous shoals (Cattelan and Griggio 2020), for example, shoaling with conspecifics, are highly advantageous in terms of diluting predation risk and/or foraging for similar resources (Krause and Godin 1994). However, mixed-species shoaling is also common in fishes. Studies have shown that many fishes choose to shoal with either heteroor conspecifics based on the given","PeriodicalId":18210,"journal":{"name":"Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology","volume":"121 1","pages":"35 - 44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Larger versus smaller heterospecifics: shoaling behavior in orange chromides, an endemic cichlid of the Indian subcontinent\",\"authors\":\"S. Mallick, Heli J. Raval, R. Ghosal\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10236244.2022.2085571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the biological world, group formation and affiliation to group members is a fascinating area of research as it contributes toward understanding the behavioral strategies of an organism (Parrish and Edelstein-Keshet 1999). Several behavioral studies on animals have been conducted to observe and understand patterns of social group formation, and to investigate the group dynamics under different ecological contexts (Rodgers et al. 2011; Gómez-Laplaza 2012). Among the vertebrate model systems, fish taxa are a popular choice to understand group living behavior (Couzin and Krause 2003). Group living in the form of shoaling and schooling behavior in fishes have been studied in depth (Camacho-Cervantes et al., 2019; Pitcher 1986; Krause et al. 2002; Couzin and Krause 2003; Sumpter et al. 2008; Huntingford and Ruiz-Gomez 2009; Gómez-Laplaza 2012; Meuthen et al. 2016), and it still remains one of the intriguing areas of research in the field of behavioral sciences (Kareklas et al. 2017; Miller 2017; Pouca and Brown 2017). A shoal is defined as an aggregation where the shoaling members maintain a nearest neighbor distance of 3–4 body lengths among each other (Clark and Evans 1954; Pitcher and Parrish 1993). Shoals are more social in nature (Pitcher 1983), and shoaling patterns are influenced by several factors, for example, size of the shoal (Krause et al. 1996), dietary preference (Morrell et al. 2007), phenotypic characteristics (Wong and Rosenthal 2005), developmental stages (Lee-Jenkins and Godin 2010), sex (Ruhl and McRobert 2005), and species identity (Griffiths and Magurran 1997) of the shoaling partners, and availability of resources (Ward et al. 2005), presence or absence of predators (Chivers et al. 1995), and even on physical properties of the aquatic habitat (Ward et al. 2007). Shoaling preferences vary across conditions (McRobert and Bradner 1998; Ward and Hart 2003), and it is generally believed that phenotypically homogenous shoals (Cattelan and Griggio 2020), for example, shoaling with conspecifics, are highly advantageous in terms of diluting predation risk and/or foraging for similar resources (Krause and Godin 1994). However, mixed-species shoaling is also common in fishes. Studies have shown that many fishes choose to shoal with either heteroor conspecifics based on the given\",\"PeriodicalId\":18210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology\",\"volume\":\"121 1\",\"pages\":\"35 - 44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10236244.2022.2085571\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10236244.2022.2085571","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在生物界,群体的形成和与群体成员的联系是一个令人着迷的研究领域,因为它有助于理解生物体的行为策略(Parrish和edelstein - kesshet 1999)。为了观察和理解社会群体形成的模式,并调查不同生态环境下的群体动态,已经对动物进行了几项行为研究(Rodgers et al. 2011;Gomez-Laplaza 2012)。在脊椎动物模型系统中,鱼类分类群是理解群体生活行为的普遍选择(Couzin and Krause 2003)。以鱼群和鱼群行为形式存在的群体生活已被深入研究(camaco - cervantes et al., 2019;投手1986;Krause et al. 2002;Couzin and Krause 2003;Sumpter et al. 2008;Huntingford and Ruiz-Gomez 2009;Gomez-Laplaza 2012;Meuthen et al. 2016),它仍然是行为科学领域有趣的研究领域之一(Kareklas et al. 2017;米勒2017年;Pouca and Brown 2017)。浅滩被定义为一个集合,其中浅滩成员彼此之间保持3-4个身长的最近邻距离(Clark and Evans 1954;皮彻和帕里什1993)。浅滩在本质上更具社会性(Pitcher 1983),浅滩模式受到几个因素的影响,例如,浅滩的大小(Krause et al. 1996)、饮食偏好(Morrell et al. 2007)、表型特征(Wong and Rosenthal 2005)、发育阶段(Lee-Jenkins and Godin 2010)、性别(Ruhl and McRobert 2005)、浅滩同伴的物种身份(Griffiths and Magurran 1997)和资源的可获得性(Ward et al. 2005)。捕食者的存在与否(Chivers et al. 1995),甚至水生栖息地的物理特性(Ward et al. 2007)。不同条件下的浅滩偏好不同(mcrobert&bradner 1998;Ward and Hart 2003),人们普遍认为,表型同质的鱼群(Cattelan and Griggio 2020),例如,具有同种生物的鱼群在稀释捕食风险和/或觅食类似资源方面非常有利(Krause and Godin 1994)。然而,混合鱼群在鱼类中也很常见。研究表明,许多鱼类选择与异种或同种基于给定的浅滩
Larger versus smaller heterospecifics: shoaling behavior in orange chromides, an endemic cichlid of the Indian subcontinent
In the biological world, group formation and affiliation to group members is a fascinating area of research as it contributes toward understanding the behavioral strategies of an organism (Parrish and Edelstein-Keshet 1999). Several behavioral studies on animals have been conducted to observe and understand patterns of social group formation, and to investigate the group dynamics under different ecological contexts (Rodgers et al. 2011; Gómez-Laplaza 2012). Among the vertebrate model systems, fish taxa are a popular choice to understand group living behavior (Couzin and Krause 2003). Group living in the form of shoaling and schooling behavior in fishes have been studied in depth (Camacho-Cervantes et al., 2019; Pitcher 1986; Krause et al. 2002; Couzin and Krause 2003; Sumpter et al. 2008; Huntingford and Ruiz-Gomez 2009; Gómez-Laplaza 2012; Meuthen et al. 2016), and it still remains one of the intriguing areas of research in the field of behavioral sciences (Kareklas et al. 2017; Miller 2017; Pouca and Brown 2017). A shoal is defined as an aggregation where the shoaling members maintain a nearest neighbor distance of 3–4 body lengths among each other (Clark and Evans 1954; Pitcher and Parrish 1993). Shoals are more social in nature (Pitcher 1983), and shoaling patterns are influenced by several factors, for example, size of the shoal (Krause et al. 1996), dietary preference (Morrell et al. 2007), phenotypic characteristics (Wong and Rosenthal 2005), developmental stages (Lee-Jenkins and Godin 2010), sex (Ruhl and McRobert 2005), and species identity (Griffiths and Magurran 1997) of the shoaling partners, and availability of resources (Ward et al. 2005), presence or absence of predators (Chivers et al. 1995), and even on physical properties of the aquatic habitat (Ward et al. 2007). Shoaling preferences vary across conditions (McRobert and Bradner 1998; Ward and Hart 2003), and it is generally believed that phenotypically homogenous shoals (Cattelan and Griggio 2020), for example, shoaling with conspecifics, are highly advantageous in terms of diluting predation risk and/or foraging for similar resources (Krause and Godin 1994). However, mixed-species shoaling is also common in fishes. Studies have shown that many fishes choose to shoal with either heteroor conspecifics based on the given
期刊介绍:
Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology is devoted to the publication of papers covering field and laboratory research into all aspects of the behaviour and physiology of all marine and freshwater animals within the contexts of ecology, evolution and conservation.
As the living resources of the world’s oceans, rivers and lakes are attracting increasing attention as food sources for humans and for their role in global ecology, the journal will also publish the results of research in the areas of fisheries biology and technology where the behaviour and physiology described have clear links to the contexts mentioned above.
The journal will accept for publication Research Articles, Reviews, Rapid Communications and Technical Notes (see Instructions for authors for details). In addition, Editorials, Opinions and Book Reviews (invited and suggested) will also occasionally be published. Suggestions to the Editor-In-Chief for Special Issues are encouraged and will be considered on an ad hoc basis.
With the goal of supporting early career researchers, the journal particularly invites submissions from graduate students and post-doctoral researchers. In addition to recognising the time constraints and logistical limitations their research often faces, and their particular need for a prompt review process, accepted articles by such researchers will be given prominence within the journal (see Instructions for authors for details).