“狂野的西部”还是项目管理?作为写作管理员穿越政治

Q1 Arts and Humanities Computers and Composition Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.compcom.2022.102737
Rebecca Miner
{"title":"“狂野的西部”还是项目管理?作为写作管理员穿越政治","authors":"Rebecca Miner","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2022.102737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using Douglas Hesse's (2002) work on political areas as a framework, this article analyzes the lessons learned about the nuances of shifting political junctures in writing program administration during the pandemic crisis, especially as the use of technology has altered pedagogical and political dynamics. Specifically, this article examines Hesse's (2002) four areas as the basis of introspection: the department, the institution, the profession, and the public; finally, this article concludes with digital suggestions on moving forward through this tumultuous time. Stories from technical writing and composition faculty are used as anecdotes for the lessons learned on perceptions of the additional stressors of writing administration politicking. Ultimately, the faculty stories that traversed the pandemic showed that we must take further advantage of online writing instruction (in all its various forms) and maintain the OWI Principles if we are to manage academic politicking at these various institutional levels.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 102737"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Wild, wild west” or program administration? Traversing politics as writing administrators\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Miner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compcom.2022.102737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Using Douglas Hesse's (2002) work on political areas as a framework, this article analyzes the lessons learned about the nuances of shifting political junctures in writing program administration during the pandemic crisis, especially as the use of technology has altered pedagogical and political dynamics. Specifically, this article examines Hesse's (2002) four areas as the basis of introspection: the department, the institution, the profession, and the public; finally, this article concludes with digital suggestions on moving forward through this tumultuous time. Stories from technical writing and composition faculty are used as anecdotes for the lessons learned on perceptions of the additional stressors of writing administration politicking. Ultimately, the faculty stories that traversed the pandemic showed that we must take further advantage of online writing instruction (in all its various forms) and maintain the OWI Principles if we are to manage academic politicking at these various institutional levels.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Composition\",\"volume\":\"66 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102737\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Composition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461522000457\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Composition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461522000457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以道格拉斯·黑塞(Douglas Hesse, 2002)在政治领域的研究为框架,分析了疫情期间写作项目管理中不断变化的政治节点的细微差别所带来的经验教训,尤其是在技术的使用改变了教学和政治动态的情况下。具体而言,本文考察了Hesse(2002)的四个领域作为内省的基础:部门、机构、专业和公众;最后,本文总结了在这个动荡的时代向前发展的数字建议。来自技术写作和写作教师的故事被用作对写作行政政治的额外压力源的看法的经验教训的轶事。最终,贯穿疫情的教师故事表明,如果我们要在这些不同的机构层面管理学术政治,我们必须进一步利用在线写作教学(各种形式)并维护OWI原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Wild, wild west” or program administration? Traversing politics as writing administrators

Using Douglas Hesse's (2002) work on political areas as a framework, this article analyzes the lessons learned about the nuances of shifting political junctures in writing program administration during the pandemic crisis, especially as the use of technology has altered pedagogical and political dynamics. Specifically, this article examines Hesse's (2002) four areas as the basis of introspection: the department, the institution, the profession, and the public; finally, this article concludes with digital suggestions on moving forward through this tumultuous time. Stories from technical writing and composition faculty are used as anecdotes for the lessons learned on perceptions of the additional stressors of writing administration politicking. Ultimately, the faculty stories that traversed the pandemic showed that we must take further advantage of online writing instruction (in all its various forms) and maintain the OWI Principles if we are to manage academic politicking at these various institutional levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Composition
Computers and Composition Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Computers and Composition: An International Journal is devoted to exploring the use of computers in writing classes, writing programs, and writing research. It provides a forum for discussing issues connected with writing and computer use. It also offers information about integrating computers into writing programs on the basis of sound theoretical and pedagogical decisions, and empirical evidence. It welcomes articles, reviews, and letters to the Editors that may be of interest to readers, including descriptions of computer-aided writing and/or reading instruction, discussions of topics related to computer use of software development; explorations of controversial ethical, legal, or social issues related to the use of computers in writing programs.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Transformative transmediation: Eliciting student self-evaluation of academic writing through the video essay assignment A rhetorical consideration of the {XE “embedded”} index Letter from the Editor Generosity in computers and writing: Doing what Gail, Halcyon, Johndan, and Bill Taught Us
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1