{"title":"西撒克逊英语中“ie”拼写的不规则性:第三人称代词的变化","authors":"Marco Condorelli","doi":"10.17811/selim.24.2019.29-52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Orthographic consistency was rarely maintained in most Old English varieties, because the language system was relatively new and spelling norms took time to develop.While full standardisation is never expected in Old English, the understanding of factors underlying patterns of regularity and irregularity are paramount for a full grasp of issues pertaining to authorship, textuality and other linguistic and non-linguistic levels of analysis. These notes explore spelling irregularity in material from West Saxon dialects, bringing comparative examples of variation in spelling between early West Saxon (eWS) and late West Saxon (lWS) . West Saxon generally stands up for its emphasis on some degree of orthographic standardisation and yet appears to display interesting patterns of variation. The focus of my notes will be on particular instances of spelling inconsistencies, with special attention to a specific category of words where appears to vary more frequently, namely third-person pronouns. For my exploratory analysis, various witnesses of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle (i.e. examples of eWS and lWS texts) were compared. The data was collected from different sections of an orthography-friendly edition of four different manuscripts, MSA (Bately 1986), MSB (Taylor 1983), MSC (O’Brien O’Keefe 2001) and MSD (Cubbin 1996), and compared with digital copies of the original manuscripts. The latter part of these notes points to some of the factors which could explain the features detected, with an exhortation for future researchers to build on some of the ideas proposed and explore new territory.Keywords: Old English; spelling; pronouns; variation; early West Saxon; late West Saxon","PeriodicalId":44450,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of English Studies","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Irregularity of the 'ie' spellings in West Saxon English: Remarks on variation in third-person pronouns\",\"authors\":\"Marco Condorelli\",\"doi\":\"10.17811/selim.24.2019.29-52\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Orthographic consistency was rarely maintained in most Old English varieties, because the language system was relatively new and spelling norms took time to develop.While full standardisation is never expected in Old English, the understanding of factors underlying patterns of regularity and irregularity are paramount for a full grasp of issues pertaining to authorship, textuality and other linguistic and non-linguistic levels of analysis. These notes explore spelling irregularity in material from West Saxon dialects, bringing comparative examples of variation in spelling between early West Saxon (eWS) and late West Saxon (lWS) . West Saxon generally stands up for its emphasis on some degree of orthographic standardisation and yet appears to display interesting patterns of variation. The focus of my notes will be on particular instances of spelling inconsistencies, with special attention to a specific category of words where appears to vary more frequently, namely third-person pronouns. For my exploratory analysis, various witnesses of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle (i.e. examples of eWS and lWS texts) were compared. The data was collected from different sections of an orthography-friendly edition of four different manuscripts, MSA (Bately 1986), MSB (Taylor 1983), MSC (O’Brien O’Keefe 2001) and MSD (Cubbin 1996), and compared with digital copies of the original manuscripts. The latter part of these notes points to some of the factors which could explain the features detected, with an exhortation for future researchers to build on some of the ideas proposed and explore new territory.Keywords: Old English; spelling; pronouns; variation; early West Saxon; late West Saxon\",\"PeriodicalId\":44450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of English Studies\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of English Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17811/selim.24.2019.29-52\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17811/selim.24.2019.29-52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在大多数古英语变体中,正字法的一致性很少保持,因为语言系统相对较新,拼写规范需要时间来发展。虽然在古英语中从未期望完全标准化,但理解规则和不规则模式背后的因素对于充分掌握作者身份、文本性以及其他语言和非语言层面的分析问题至关重要。这些笔记探讨了西撒克逊方言材料中的拼写不规则性,带来了早期西撒克逊(eWS)和晚期西撒克逊(lWS)之间拼写变化的比较例子。西撒克逊人通常强调某种程度的正字法标准化,但似乎显示出有趣的变化模式。我的笔记将重点放在拼写不一致的特定实例上,特别注意一种似乎变化更频繁的特定类别的单词,即第三人称代词。在我的探索性分析中,我比较了盎格鲁-撒克逊编年史的各种见证(即eWS和lWS文本的例子)。数据是从四种不同手稿的正字法友好版的不同部分收集的,MSA (Bately 1986), MSB (Taylor 1983), MSC (O 'Brien O 'Keefe 2001)和MSD (Cubbin 1996),并与原始手稿的数字副本进行比较。这些笔记的后一部分指出了一些可以解释所检测到的特征的因素,并劝告未来的研究人员在提出的一些想法的基础上进一步探索新的领域。关键词:古英语;拼写;代词;变异;早期西撒克逊人;晚西撒克逊
Irregularity of the 'ie' spellings in West Saxon English: Remarks on variation in third-person pronouns
Orthographic consistency was rarely maintained in most Old English varieties, because the language system was relatively new and spelling norms took time to develop.While full standardisation is never expected in Old English, the understanding of factors underlying patterns of regularity and irregularity are paramount for a full grasp of issues pertaining to authorship, textuality and other linguistic and non-linguistic levels of analysis. These notes explore spelling irregularity in material from West Saxon dialects, bringing comparative examples of variation in spelling between early West Saxon (eWS) and late West Saxon (lWS) . West Saxon generally stands up for its emphasis on some degree of orthographic standardisation and yet appears to display interesting patterns of variation. The focus of my notes will be on particular instances of spelling inconsistencies, with special attention to a specific category of words where appears to vary more frequently, namely third-person pronouns. For my exploratory analysis, various witnesses of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle (i.e. examples of eWS and lWS texts) were compared. The data was collected from different sections of an orthography-friendly edition of four different manuscripts, MSA (Bately 1986), MSB (Taylor 1983), MSC (O’Brien O’Keefe 2001) and MSD (Cubbin 1996), and compared with digital copies of the original manuscripts. The latter part of these notes points to some of the factors which could explain the features detected, with an exhortation for future researchers to build on some of the ideas proposed and explore new territory.Keywords: Old English; spelling; pronouns; variation; early West Saxon; late West Saxon
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of English Studies (IJES) is a double-blind peer review journal which seeks to reflect the newest research in the general field of English Studies: English Language and Linguistics, Applied English Linguistics, Literature in English and Cultural studies of English-speaking countries. We will give preference to keeping the balance amongst the areas and subareas belonging to English Studies whenever possible.