Parijat R. Tripathi, U. Poddar, S. Yachha, M. Sarma, A. Srivastava
{"title":"单剂量与分剂量聚乙二醇用于儿童结肠制剂的疗效:一项随机对照研究。","authors":"Parijat R. Tripathi, U. Poddar, S. Yachha, M. Sarma, A. Srivastava","doi":"10.1097/MPG.0000000000002511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is the most effective colon cleansing agent but volume related adverse effects are common. Though split-dose PEG is used in adults, no pediatric study so-far has compared split-dose with single-dose PEG. We aimed at comparing the efficacy and tolerability of split-dose versus single-dose PEG for bowel preparation in children. METHODS Consecutive children (1-18 years) were randomized into either single-dose or split-dose PEG. Single-dose group received 4000 mL/1.73mPEG solution day before colonoscopy while split-dose group received half dose day before and the remaining half on the day of colonoscopy. Effectiveness of bowel preparation was assessed on Aronchik scale, by the endoscopist who was blinded to the type of preparation. Inter-observer variability was analyzed by comparing with independent scoring by the blinded trained endoscopy-nurse. The trial was registered with Clinical Trials Registry of India. (Trail number2017/08/009303) RESULTS:: Of the 220 randomized children, 179 completed the study (split-dose: 93, single-dose: 86) The mean age of the study population was 11.51 (4.82) years (72.6%males). The efficacy of bowel preparation was better with split-dose (satisfactory preparation:76.34% vs. 43.02%, p < 0.001) with almost perfect inter-observer agreement (k = 0.803). Nausea, vomiting and sleep disturbance were significantly less in split-dose than single-dose group (p < 0.05). Split-dose patients were able to drink PEG solution faster (p = 0.002). Total sleep duration and uninterrupted sleep duration was also better in split-dose group as compared to single-dose (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Split-dose PEG is more effective than single-dose regimen for bowel preparation with better tolerability and improved sleep quality in pediatric population.","PeriodicalId":16725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Single Versus Split Dose Polyethylene Glycol for Colonic Preparation in Children: A Randomized Control Study.\",\"authors\":\"Parijat R. Tripathi, U. Poddar, S. Yachha, M. Sarma, A. Srivastava\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MPG.0000000000002511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is the most effective colon cleansing agent but volume related adverse effects are common. Though split-dose PEG is used in adults, no pediatric study so-far has compared split-dose with single-dose PEG. We aimed at comparing the efficacy and tolerability of split-dose versus single-dose PEG for bowel preparation in children. METHODS Consecutive children (1-18 years) were randomized into either single-dose or split-dose PEG. Single-dose group received 4000 mL/1.73mPEG solution day before colonoscopy while split-dose group received half dose day before and the remaining half on the day of colonoscopy. Effectiveness of bowel preparation was assessed on Aronchik scale, by the endoscopist who was blinded to the type of preparation. Inter-observer variability was analyzed by comparing with independent scoring by the blinded trained endoscopy-nurse. The trial was registered with Clinical Trials Registry of India. (Trail number2017/08/009303) RESULTS:: Of the 220 randomized children, 179 completed the study (split-dose: 93, single-dose: 86) The mean age of the study population was 11.51 (4.82) years (72.6%males). The efficacy of bowel preparation was better with split-dose (satisfactory preparation:76.34% vs. 43.02%, p < 0.001) with almost perfect inter-observer agreement (k = 0.803). Nausea, vomiting and sleep disturbance were significantly less in split-dose than single-dose group (p < 0.05). Split-dose patients were able to drink PEG solution faster (p = 0.002). Total sleep duration and uninterrupted sleep duration was also better in split-dose group as compared to single-dose (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Split-dose PEG is more effective than single-dose regimen for bowel preparation with better tolerability and improved sleep quality in pediatric population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
摘要
目的聚乙二醇(PEG)是最有效的结肠清洗剂,但与体积相关的不良反应是常见的。虽然分次给药的聚乙二醇用于成人,但到目前为止还没有儿科研究将分次给药与单次给药进行比较。我们的目的是比较分剂量与单剂量聚乙二醇在儿童肠道准备中的疗效和耐受性。方法连续1 ~ 18岁儿童随机分为单剂量和分剂量两组。单剂量组在结肠镜检查前一天给予4000 mL/1.73mPEG溶液,分剂量组在结肠镜检查前一天给予半剂量,其余一半在结肠镜检查当天给予。肠道准备的有效性由不知道准备类型的内窥镜医师根据Aronchik量表进行评估。通过比较盲法训练内窥镜护士的独立评分来分析观察者间的变异性。该试验已在印度临床试验登记处注册。结果:在220名随机分配的儿童中,179名完成了研究(分次给药:93名,单次给药:86名),研究人群的平均年龄为11.51(4.82)岁(72.6%为男性)。分次给药的肠道准备效果更好(满意的准备:76.34% vs. 43.02%, p < 0.001),观察者间几乎完全一致(k = 0.803)。分次给药组恶心、呕吐、睡眠障碍明显少于单次给药组(p < 0.05)。分次给药患者能更快地喝下PEG溶液(p = 0.002)。分次给药组总睡眠时间和不间断睡眠时间也优于单次给药组(p = 0.001)。结论聚乙二醇分次给药比单次给药更有效,耐受性更好,改善了儿童的睡眠质量。
Efficacy of Single Versus Split Dose Polyethylene Glycol for Colonic Preparation in Children: A Randomized Control Study.
OBJECTIVES Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is the most effective colon cleansing agent but volume related adverse effects are common. Though split-dose PEG is used in adults, no pediatric study so-far has compared split-dose with single-dose PEG. We aimed at comparing the efficacy and tolerability of split-dose versus single-dose PEG for bowel preparation in children. METHODS Consecutive children (1-18 years) were randomized into either single-dose or split-dose PEG. Single-dose group received 4000 mL/1.73mPEG solution day before colonoscopy while split-dose group received half dose day before and the remaining half on the day of colonoscopy. Effectiveness of bowel preparation was assessed on Aronchik scale, by the endoscopist who was blinded to the type of preparation. Inter-observer variability was analyzed by comparing with independent scoring by the blinded trained endoscopy-nurse. The trial was registered with Clinical Trials Registry of India. (Trail number2017/08/009303) RESULTS:: Of the 220 randomized children, 179 completed the study (split-dose: 93, single-dose: 86) The mean age of the study population was 11.51 (4.82) years (72.6%males). The efficacy of bowel preparation was better with split-dose (satisfactory preparation:76.34% vs. 43.02%, p < 0.001) with almost perfect inter-observer agreement (k = 0.803). Nausea, vomiting and sleep disturbance were significantly less in split-dose than single-dose group (p < 0.05). Split-dose patients were able to drink PEG solution faster (p = 0.002). Total sleep duration and uninterrupted sleep duration was also better in split-dose group as compared to single-dose (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Split-dose PEG is more effective than single-dose regimen for bowel preparation with better tolerability and improved sleep quality in pediatric population.