亚临界无标度随机图上的选民模型

Pub Date : 2022-07-23 DOI:10.1002/rsa.21107
J. Fernley, Marcel Ortgiese
{"title":"亚临界无标度随机图上的选民模型","authors":"J. Fernley, Marcel Ortgiese","doi":"10.1002/rsa.21107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The voter model is a classical interacting particle system modelling how consensus is formed across a network. We analyze the time to consensus for the voter model when the underlying graph is a subcritical scale‐free random graph. Moreover, we generalize the model to include a “temperature” parameter controlling how the graph influences the speed of opinion change. The interplay between the temperature and the structure of the random graph leads to a very rich phase diagram, where in the different phases different parts of the underlying geometry dominate the time to consensus. Finally, we also consider a discursive voter model, where voters discuss their opinions with their neighbors. Our proofs rely on the well‐known duality to coalescing random walks and a detailed understanding of the structure of the random graphs.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voter models on subcritical scale‐free random graphs\",\"authors\":\"J. Fernley, Marcel Ortgiese\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/rsa.21107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The voter model is a classical interacting particle system modelling how consensus is formed across a network. We analyze the time to consensus for the voter model when the underlying graph is a subcritical scale‐free random graph. Moreover, we generalize the model to include a “temperature” parameter controlling how the graph influences the speed of opinion change. The interplay between the temperature and the structure of the random graph leads to a very rich phase diagram, where in the different phases different parts of the underlying geometry dominate the time to consensus. Finally, we also consider a discursive voter model, where voters discuss their opinions with their neighbors. Our proofs rely on the well‐known duality to coalescing random walks and a detailed understanding of the structure of the random graphs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/rsa.21107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rsa.21107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

选民模型是一个经典的相互作用粒子系统,它模拟了如何在网络中形成共识。我们分析了当底层图是一个亚临界无标度随机图时,选民模型的共识时间。此外,我们将模型推广到包含一个“温度”参数,以控制图如何影响意见变化的速度。温度和随机图结构之间的相互作用导致了一个非常丰富的相图,在不同的相中,底层几何结构的不同部分支配着达成一致的时间。最后,我们还考虑了一个话语选民模型,其中选民与他们的邻居讨论他们的意见。我们的证明依赖于众所周知的对偶性来合并随机漫步和对随机图结构的详细理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Voter models on subcritical scale‐free random graphs
The voter model is a classical interacting particle system modelling how consensus is formed across a network. We analyze the time to consensus for the voter model when the underlying graph is a subcritical scale‐free random graph. Moreover, we generalize the model to include a “temperature” parameter controlling how the graph influences the speed of opinion change. The interplay between the temperature and the structure of the random graph leads to a very rich phase diagram, where in the different phases different parts of the underlying geometry dominate the time to consensus. Finally, we also consider a discursive voter model, where voters discuss their opinions with their neighbors. Our proofs rely on the well‐known duality to coalescing random walks and a detailed understanding of the structure of the random graphs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1