在当地呼吸科工作的医生中,分数呼出一氧化氮使用的知识

IF 0.5 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pneumon Pub Date : 2023-02-15 DOI:10.18332/pne/157588
Etienne Ceci Bonello, Rebecca Bianco, C. Gouder
{"title":"在当地呼吸科工作的医生中,分数呼出一氧化氮使用的知识","authors":"Etienne Ceci Bonello, Rebecca Bianco, C. Gouder","doi":"10.18332/pne/157588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"cut-off of <12 months and ≥12 months working in our respiratory department was set to check whether there is a statistical significance in the knowledge of FeNO testing amongst these two categories. The participants working in the department for <12 months are junior trainees currently rotating in the ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION The aim of this survey is to assess the knowledge regarding fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) testing among our junior and senior physicians currently working within the respiratory department. METHODS All medical doctors above foundation level working in the respiratory department for at least 3 months at Mater Dei Hospital were asked to complete a questionnaire with a total of 19 true or false questions. Questions were based on current international guidelines and recommendations. RESULTS Our cohort included a total of 25 doctors. The mean age of experience working as a physician was 8 years; 84% of doctors (n=21) were aware that FeNO testing is available at our hospital. Questions assessing clinical indications and interpretation of FeNO in asthma and different respiratory conditions showed overall significantly better results between junior and senior trainees (p=0.013), though still lacking in certain aspects especially in conditions unrelated to asthma. CONCLUSIONS Our results show that doctors working in our department are overall knowledgeable about the use of FeNO in relation to the diagnosis and management of asthma. However, its use and interpretation in relation to other respiratory conditions and co-morbidities is lacking. This emphasizes the need to educate local respiratory trainees further on FeNO testing.","PeriodicalId":42353,"journal":{"name":"Pneumon","volume":"160 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge of fractional exhaled nitric oxide use among doctors working in a local respiratory department\",\"authors\":\"Etienne Ceci Bonello, Rebecca Bianco, C. Gouder\",\"doi\":\"10.18332/pne/157588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"cut-off of <12 months and ≥12 months working in our respiratory department was set to check whether there is a statistical significance in the knowledge of FeNO testing amongst these two categories. The participants working in the department for <12 months are junior trainees currently rotating in the ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION The aim of this survey is to assess the knowledge regarding fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) testing among our junior and senior physicians currently working within the respiratory department. METHODS All medical doctors above foundation level working in the respiratory department for at least 3 months at Mater Dei Hospital were asked to complete a questionnaire with a total of 19 true or false questions. Questions were based on current international guidelines and recommendations. RESULTS Our cohort included a total of 25 doctors. The mean age of experience working as a physician was 8 years; 84% of doctors (n=21) were aware that FeNO testing is available at our hospital. Questions assessing clinical indications and interpretation of FeNO in asthma and different respiratory conditions showed overall significantly better results between junior and senior trainees (p=0.013), though still lacking in certain aspects especially in conditions unrelated to asthma. CONCLUSIONS Our results show that doctors working in our department are overall knowledgeable about the use of FeNO in relation to the diagnosis and management of asthma. However, its use and interpretation in relation to other respiratory conditions and co-morbidities is lacking. This emphasizes the need to educate local respiratory trainees further on FeNO testing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pneumon\",\"volume\":\"160 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pneumon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18332/pne/157588\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pneumon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/pne/157588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设置<12个月和≥12个月在我呼吸科工作的截止时间,检查两类患者对FeNO检测知识的了解是否有统计学意义。本调查的目的是评估目前在呼吸科工作的初级和高级医生对分次呼气一氧化氮(FeNO)测试的知识。方法对所有在马特戴伊医院呼吸科工作3个月以上的基层以上医师进行问卷调查,共19道题对或错。问题是根据目前的国际准则和建议提出的。结果:我们的队列共包括25名医生。从事医师工作的平均年龄为8岁;84%的医生(n=21)知道我们医院可以进行FeNO检测。评估哮喘和不同呼吸条件下FeNO的临床适应症和解释的问题显示,初级和高级学员的总体结果明显更好(p=0.013),尽管在某些方面仍然缺乏,特别是在与哮喘无关的条件下。结论:本研究结果表明,我科医生对芬诺在哮喘诊断和治疗中的应用有较全面的了解。然而,它在其他呼吸系统疾病和合并症中的使用和解释是缺乏的。这强调有必要进一步教育本地呼吸学受训人员进行FeNO测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Knowledge of fractional exhaled nitric oxide use among doctors working in a local respiratory department
cut-off of <12 months and ≥12 months working in our respiratory department was set to check whether there is a statistical significance in the knowledge of FeNO testing amongst these two categories. The participants working in the department for <12 months are junior trainees currently rotating in the ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION The aim of this survey is to assess the knowledge regarding fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) testing among our junior and senior physicians currently working within the respiratory department. METHODS All medical doctors above foundation level working in the respiratory department for at least 3 months at Mater Dei Hospital were asked to complete a questionnaire with a total of 19 true or false questions. Questions were based on current international guidelines and recommendations. RESULTS Our cohort included a total of 25 doctors. The mean age of experience working as a physician was 8 years; 84% of doctors (n=21) were aware that FeNO testing is available at our hospital. Questions assessing clinical indications and interpretation of FeNO in asthma and different respiratory conditions showed overall significantly better results between junior and senior trainees (p=0.013), though still lacking in certain aspects especially in conditions unrelated to asthma. CONCLUSIONS Our results show that doctors working in our department are overall knowledgeable about the use of FeNO in relation to the diagnosis and management of asthma. However, its use and interpretation in relation to other respiratory conditions and co-morbidities is lacking. This emphasizes the need to educate local respiratory trainees further on FeNO testing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pneumon
Pneumon RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
28.60%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Tuberculosis of the temporomandibular joint: a rare case report and review of the literature Determinants of tobacco use patterns and predictors of quit among older women in India: Findings from the study on global aging and adult health Long-term efficacy of different doses of steroid in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: A prospective cohort study Bronchial atresia mimicking Swyer–James syndrome Right atrial strain during prone ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1