索罗利什曼属的单系起源

David Croan , John Ellis
{"title":"索罗利什曼属的单系起源","authors":"David Croan ,&nbsp;John Ellis","doi":"10.1016/S0003-9365(97)80007-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A 1268-bp DNA fragment representing 25% of the RNA polymerase II largest subunit gene has been used to infer the phylogenetic relationships among four <em>Sauroleishmania</em> species, and their relatedness to the closely related genera <em>Leishmania</em> and <em>Endotrypanum</em>. Comparison of the nucleotide sequences showed that 94% of phylogenetically informative sites occurred at silent codon positions. Distance (neighbor-joining) and weighted parismony analysis of the nucleotide sequence alignment each produced alternate optimal trees which varied in the placement of <em>L. (Viannia) braziliensis</em> and the <em>Sauroleishmania</em>. The cost of branch swapping (number of steps in parsimony analysis) indicated that few steps were required to alternate between these topologies (representing 0.5% of total tree length). In contrast, distance and parsimony analysis of the predicted protein sequence yielded congruent results. The calculated homoplasy, retention and rescaled consistency indices of the protein sequence data indicated that homoplasy was significantly reduced in the protein sequence alignment as compared to the nucleotide sequence alignment. The protein-inferred phylogenies provide strong support for the monophyly of the <em>Sauroleishmania</em> and indicate that these parasites emerged subsequent to the separation of the <em>Leishmania</em> subgenera <em>L. (Leishmania)</em> and <em>L. (Viannia)</em>. The close affiliation between <em>Leishmania</em> and <em>Sauroleishmania</em> suggests that the lizard parasites might best be retained in the genus <em>Leishmania</em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100118,"journal":{"name":"Archiv für Protistenkunde","volume":"148 3","pages":"Pages 269-275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0003-9365(97)80007-3","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monophyletic origin of the genus Sauroleishmania\",\"authors\":\"David Croan ,&nbsp;John Ellis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0003-9365(97)80007-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A 1268-bp DNA fragment representing 25% of the RNA polymerase II largest subunit gene has been used to infer the phylogenetic relationships among four <em>Sauroleishmania</em> species, and their relatedness to the closely related genera <em>Leishmania</em> and <em>Endotrypanum</em>. Comparison of the nucleotide sequences showed that 94% of phylogenetically informative sites occurred at silent codon positions. Distance (neighbor-joining) and weighted parismony analysis of the nucleotide sequence alignment each produced alternate optimal trees which varied in the placement of <em>L. (Viannia) braziliensis</em> and the <em>Sauroleishmania</em>. The cost of branch swapping (number of steps in parsimony analysis) indicated that few steps were required to alternate between these topologies (representing 0.5% of total tree length). In contrast, distance and parsimony analysis of the predicted protein sequence yielded congruent results. The calculated homoplasy, retention and rescaled consistency indices of the protein sequence data indicated that homoplasy was significantly reduced in the protein sequence alignment as compared to the nucleotide sequence alignment. The protein-inferred phylogenies provide strong support for the monophyly of the <em>Sauroleishmania</em> and indicate that these parasites emerged subsequent to the separation of the <em>Leishmania</em> subgenera <em>L. (Leishmania)</em> and <em>L. (Viannia)</em>. The close affiliation between <em>Leishmania</em> and <em>Sauroleishmania</em> suggests that the lizard parasites might best be retained in the genus <em>Leishmania</em>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archiv für Protistenkunde\",\"volume\":\"148 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 269-275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0003-9365(97)80007-3\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archiv für Protistenkunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003936597800073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv für Protistenkunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003936597800073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

一个1268-bp的DNA片段代表25%的RNA聚合酶II最大亚基基因被用来推断四个索罗利什曼原虫种之间的系统发育关系,以及它们与利什曼原虫属和内锥虫属的亲缘关系。核苷酸序列的比较表明,94%的系统发育信息位点发生在沉默密码子位置。距离(邻居连接)和加权匹配分析均产生了不同位置的L. (Viannia) braziliensis和Sauroleishmania的备选最佳树。分支交换的成本(简洁性分析中的步骤数)表明,在这些拓扑(占总树长度的0.5%)之间交替需要很少的步骤。相比之下,预测蛋白序列的距离和简约性分析得到了一致的结果。计算的蛋白序列数据的同质性、保留率和重新标度的一致性指数表明,与核苷酸序列比对相比,蛋白序列比对的同质性明显降低。蛋白质推断的系统发育为索罗利什曼原虫的单系性提供了强有力的支持,并表明这些寄生虫是在利什曼原虫亚属L.(利什曼原虫)和L.(利什曼原虫)分离之后出现的。利什曼原虫和索罗利什曼原虫之间的密切联系表明,蜥蜴寄生虫可能最好保留在利什曼原虫属中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monophyletic origin of the genus Sauroleishmania

A 1268-bp DNA fragment representing 25% of the RNA polymerase II largest subunit gene has been used to infer the phylogenetic relationships among four Sauroleishmania species, and their relatedness to the closely related genera Leishmania and Endotrypanum. Comparison of the nucleotide sequences showed that 94% of phylogenetically informative sites occurred at silent codon positions. Distance (neighbor-joining) and weighted parismony analysis of the nucleotide sequence alignment each produced alternate optimal trees which varied in the placement of L. (Viannia) braziliensis and the Sauroleishmania. The cost of branch swapping (number of steps in parsimony analysis) indicated that few steps were required to alternate between these topologies (representing 0.5% of total tree length). In contrast, distance and parsimony analysis of the predicted protein sequence yielded congruent results. The calculated homoplasy, retention and rescaled consistency indices of the protein sequence data indicated that homoplasy was significantly reduced in the protein sequence alignment as compared to the nucleotide sequence alignment. The protein-inferred phylogenies provide strong support for the monophyly of the Sauroleishmania and indicate that these parasites emerged subsequent to the separation of the Leishmania subgenera L. (Leishmania) and L. (Viannia). The close affiliation between Leishmania and Sauroleishmania suggests that the lizard parasites might best be retained in the genus Leishmania.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative Studies on a New Brackish Water Euplotes, E. parawoodruffi n. sp., and a Redescription of Euplotes woodruffiGaw, 1939 (Ciliophora; Hypotrichida) Some Heterotrophic Flagellates from a Cultivated Garden Soil in Australia Extrachromosomal Nucleolar Apparatus in the Macronucleus of the Ciliate Paramecium putrinum: LM, EM and Confocal Microscopy Studies Arthrospira skujae, a New Planktic Tropical Cyanoprokaryote Fine Structure of Conjugation of the Ciliate Blepharisma japonicum II. Changes of Meiotic and Ameiotic Micronuclei and Development of Meiotic and Ameiotic Macronuclear Anlagen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1