M. AbdelFatah, Ibrahim Abdelmohsen, Sherif Bahaa, Mohamed Elwardany, Sameh Hefny
{"title":"老年慢性硬膜下血肿抽吸引流的价值:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"M. AbdelFatah, Ibrahim Abdelmohsen, Sherif Bahaa, Mohamed Elwardany, Sameh Hefny","doi":"10.21608/mjmu.2022.171412.1147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of suction in the subgaleal drainage system after the burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is still debatable. This study aimed to investigate the value of adding suction to the drainage system of CSDH in elderly patients. Methods: This cohort study retrospectively reviewed the data of the CSDH patients operated on at our university hospital in the last eight years. The inclusion criteria were elderly patients who underwent evacuation of a unilateral CSDH through two burr holes followed by placing a subgaleal drainage tube. Two hundred seventy-three consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria. Seventy-six patients (27.8%) received suction drainage. The comparison between groups with qualitative data was done using the chi-square test. The comparison between groups with quantitative data was done using the t-test. The statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the suction and the nonsuction drainage groups regarding the hospitalization period, the postoperative seizures, or the recurrence rate. However, the postoperative pneumocephalus volume in the suction drainage group was significantly lower than in the non-suction drainage group. None of the patients developed acute subdural or intracerebral hemorrhage. Conclusions: Suction drainage did not add statistically significant value to the closed drainage system regarding the hospitalization period, postoperative seizures, or recurrence rate of the CSDH. A prospective controlled study is needed to increase the evidence for this finding.","PeriodicalId":18173,"journal":{"name":"Mansoura Veterinary Medical Journal","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Value of Suction Drainage for a Chronic Subdural Hematoma in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Cohort study\",\"authors\":\"M. AbdelFatah, Ibrahim Abdelmohsen, Sherif Bahaa, Mohamed Elwardany, Sameh Hefny\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/mjmu.2022.171412.1147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The use of suction in the subgaleal drainage system after the burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is still debatable. This study aimed to investigate the value of adding suction to the drainage system of CSDH in elderly patients. Methods: This cohort study retrospectively reviewed the data of the CSDH patients operated on at our university hospital in the last eight years. The inclusion criteria were elderly patients who underwent evacuation of a unilateral CSDH through two burr holes followed by placing a subgaleal drainage tube. Two hundred seventy-three consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria. Seventy-six patients (27.8%) received suction drainage. The comparison between groups with qualitative data was done using the chi-square test. The comparison between groups with quantitative data was done using the t-test. The statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the suction and the nonsuction drainage groups regarding the hospitalization period, the postoperative seizures, or the recurrence rate. However, the postoperative pneumocephalus volume in the suction drainage group was significantly lower than in the non-suction drainage group. None of the patients developed acute subdural or intracerebral hemorrhage. Conclusions: Suction drainage did not add statistically significant value to the closed drainage system regarding the hospitalization period, postoperative seizures, or recurrence rate of the CSDH. A prospective controlled study is needed to increase the evidence for this finding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mansoura Veterinary Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mansoura Veterinary Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjmu.2022.171412.1147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mansoura Veterinary Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjmu.2022.171412.1147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)钻孔引流后硬膜下引流系统中吸力的应用仍有争议。本研究旨在探讨老年CSDH患者在引流系统中增加吸力的价值。方法:回顾性分析我院近8年来收治的CSDH患者的资料。纳入标准是通过两个钻孔对单侧CSDH进行引流,随后置入galeal下引流管的老年患者。273例连续患者符合纳入标准。76例(27.8%)采用吸引引流。定性资料组间比较采用卡方检验。有定量资料的组间比较采用t检验。采用SPSS软件21版(IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA)进行统计分析。结果:抽吸组与非抽吸组住院时间、术后癫痫发作、复发率比较,差异均无统计学意义。然而,术后吸液引流组的肺水肿体积明显低于非吸液引流组。没有患者出现急性硬膜下出血或脑出血。结论:在CSDH的住院时间、术后癫痫发作、复发率方面,封闭引流系统与吸引引流没有统计学意义的增加。需要一项前瞻性对照研究来增加这一发现的证据。
The Value of Suction Drainage for a Chronic Subdural Hematoma in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Cohort study
Background: The use of suction in the subgaleal drainage system after the burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is still debatable. This study aimed to investigate the value of adding suction to the drainage system of CSDH in elderly patients. Methods: This cohort study retrospectively reviewed the data of the CSDH patients operated on at our university hospital in the last eight years. The inclusion criteria were elderly patients who underwent evacuation of a unilateral CSDH through two burr holes followed by placing a subgaleal drainage tube. Two hundred seventy-three consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria. Seventy-six patients (27.8%) received suction drainage. The comparison between groups with qualitative data was done using the chi-square test. The comparison between groups with quantitative data was done using the t-test. The statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the suction and the nonsuction drainage groups regarding the hospitalization period, the postoperative seizures, or the recurrence rate. However, the postoperative pneumocephalus volume in the suction drainage group was significantly lower than in the non-suction drainage group. None of the patients developed acute subdural or intracerebral hemorrhage. Conclusions: Suction drainage did not add statistically significant value to the closed drainage system regarding the hospitalization period, postoperative seizures, or recurrence rate of the CSDH. A prospective controlled study is needed to increase the evidence for this finding.