基于SARS-CoV-2 mrna疫苗在自身免疫性疾病患者中的血清学反应

Kushal N Gandhi, Nathan Joshua Manales, Asley Sanchez, S. Mukkera, A. Ammu, Jan-Ulrich Klar, Alex M Gibson, Evangelina Santiago, Ailena Mulkey, J. Holland, M. Mannem, Lakshmi P. Alahari, J. Garza
{"title":"基于SARS-CoV-2 mrna疫苗在自身免疫性疾病患者中的血清学反应","authors":"Kushal N Gandhi, Nathan Joshua Manales, Asley Sanchez, S. Mukkera, A. Ammu, Jan-Ulrich Klar, Alex M Gibson, Evangelina Santiago, Ailena Mulkey, J. Holland, M. Mannem, Lakshmi P. Alahari, J. Garza","doi":"10.29245/2578-3009/2022/3.1235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In the spring of 2021, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines were approved and distributed in the United States for the public to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, but their rapid development leaves some questions unanswered. Vaccine efficacy has always been a point of interest for individuals with rheumatological diseases that take immunosuppressants. This study investigates the vaccine efficacy of two COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccines, Moderna and Pfizer, in subjects in West Texas patients with autoimmune diseases. Materials and Methods: Blood was collected from Texas Tech University employees who received both doses of COVID-19 vaccines within the past nine months. Subjects were separated into either a group with a known history of rheumatic disease (n=18) or those without (n=18). The samples were analyzed for serum immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin G (IgG), and immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels using specific enzyme-linked immunoassay kits, and a neutralizing antibody test using a surrogate virus was conducted as well. Results were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test (unpaired, two-tailed). Results: There was no significant difference in serum IgG and IgA levels between the control and rheumatologic disease groups, but there were significant differences in serum IgM levels. All subjects cleared the threshold for the neutralizing antibody test. Conclusion: The relatively similar serum IgG levels and the 100% detection rate of effective neutralizing antibodies across both groups indicate promising signs of serological response for subjects with autoimmune conditions, but the relatively low serum IgA and IgM levels of the study the group warrants further investigation.","PeriodicalId":73785,"journal":{"name":"Journal of immunological sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serologic Response of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-based Vaccines in Patients with Autoimmune Diseases\",\"authors\":\"Kushal N Gandhi, Nathan Joshua Manales, Asley Sanchez, S. Mukkera, A. Ammu, Jan-Ulrich Klar, Alex M Gibson, Evangelina Santiago, Ailena Mulkey, J. Holland, M. Mannem, Lakshmi P. Alahari, J. Garza\",\"doi\":\"10.29245/2578-3009/2022/3.1235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: In the spring of 2021, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines were approved and distributed in the United States for the public to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, but their rapid development leaves some questions unanswered. Vaccine efficacy has always been a point of interest for individuals with rheumatological diseases that take immunosuppressants. This study investigates the vaccine efficacy of two COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccines, Moderna and Pfizer, in subjects in West Texas patients with autoimmune diseases. Materials and Methods: Blood was collected from Texas Tech University employees who received both doses of COVID-19 vaccines within the past nine months. Subjects were separated into either a group with a known history of rheumatic disease (n=18) or those without (n=18). The samples were analyzed for serum immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin G (IgG), and immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels using specific enzyme-linked immunoassay kits, and a neutralizing antibody test using a surrogate virus was conducted as well. Results were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test (unpaired, two-tailed). Results: There was no significant difference in serum IgG and IgA levels between the control and rheumatologic disease groups, but there were significant differences in serum IgM levels. All subjects cleared the threshold for the neutralizing antibody test. Conclusion: The relatively similar serum IgG levels and the 100% detection rate of effective neutralizing antibodies across both groups indicate promising signs of serological response for subjects with autoimmune conditions, but the relatively low serum IgA and IgM levels of the study the group warrants further investigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of immunological sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of immunological sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29245/2578-3009/2022/3.1235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of immunological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29245/2578-3009/2022/3.1235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2021年春季,2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗在美国获得批准并分发给公众,以对抗COVID-19大流行,但其快速发展留下了一些未解之谜。疫苗效力一直是一个点的兴趣与风湿病患者服用免疫抑制剂。本研究调查了两种基于COVID-19 mrna的疫苗Moderna和Pfizer在西德克萨斯州自身免疫性疾病患者中的疫苗疗效。材料和方法:采集了过去9个月内接受了两剂COVID-19疫苗的德克萨斯理工大学员工的血液。受试者被分为两组,一组有已知的风湿病史(n=18),另一组没有(n=18)。使用特异性酶联免疫测定试剂盒分析样品的血清免疫球蛋白A (IgA)、免疫球蛋白G (IgG)和免疫球蛋白M (IgM)水平,并使用替代病毒进行中和抗体测试。结果采用Mann-Whitney U检验(未配对,双尾)进行分析。结果:风湿病组与对照组血清IgG、IgA水平差异无统计学意义,IgM水平差异有统计学意义。所有受试者均达到中和抗体测试的阈值。结论:两组相对相似的血清IgG水平和有效中和抗体的100%检出率表明,对于自身免疫性疾病的受试者,有希望的血清学反应迹象,但研究组相对较低的血清IgA和IgM水平值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Serologic Response of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-based Vaccines in Patients with Autoimmune Diseases
Background: In the spring of 2021, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines were approved and distributed in the United States for the public to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, but their rapid development leaves some questions unanswered. Vaccine efficacy has always been a point of interest for individuals with rheumatological diseases that take immunosuppressants. This study investigates the vaccine efficacy of two COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccines, Moderna and Pfizer, in subjects in West Texas patients with autoimmune diseases. Materials and Methods: Blood was collected from Texas Tech University employees who received both doses of COVID-19 vaccines within the past nine months. Subjects were separated into either a group with a known history of rheumatic disease (n=18) or those without (n=18). The samples were analyzed for serum immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin G (IgG), and immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels using specific enzyme-linked immunoassay kits, and a neutralizing antibody test using a surrogate virus was conducted as well. Results were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test (unpaired, two-tailed). Results: There was no significant difference in serum IgG and IgA levels between the control and rheumatologic disease groups, but there were significant differences in serum IgM levels. All subjects cleared the threshold for the neutralizing antibody test. Conclusion: The relatively similar serum IgG levels and the 100% detection rate of effective neutralizing antibodies across both groups indicate promising signs of serological response for subjects with autoimmune conditions, but the relatively low serum IgA and IgM levels of the study the group warrants further investigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Commentary: Early-in-life Isoflurane Exposure Alters Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Juvenile Non-human Primates - a Role for Neuroinflammation? Community Involvement in Response to Ebola Virus Disease Epidemic in North Kivu and Ituri, Democratic Republic of Congo: A Mixed-Methods Study. Epidemic Response amidst Insecurity: Addressing the Ebola Virus Epidemic in the Provinces of North Kivu and Ituri. Exploring Alternative Care Platforms for Symptomatic People in the Fight against the Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak. Perceptions and Rumors About the Ebola Virus Disease Vaccine in the Ituri and Kivu Provinces of the Democratic Republic of Congo.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1