{"title":"重复家庭漂白对CAD-CAM修复材料表面粗糙度的影响","authors":"Özlem Çölgeçen, Mehmet Köse","doi":"10.5577/intdentres.2022.vol12.no3.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aimed to investigate the effects of the repeated usage of a home-bleaching agent (16% carbamide peroxide) on the surface roughness of commonly used computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacture (CAD-CAM) restoration materials.\nMethodology: Five different CAD-CAM restoration materials were used in this study: feldspathic ceramic (Vita Mark II—Group VM II), leucite-reinforced glass ceramic (IPS Empress CAD—Group EMP), lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramic (IPS e.max CAD—Group EMAX), polymer infiltrated network hybrid ceramic (Vita Enamic—Group VE), and resin nanoceramic (Lava Ultimate—Group LU). A home-bleaching agent containing 16% carbamide peroxide was applied in three repeated periods (10 days, 20 days, and 30 days of exposure). A surface profilometer was used to determine the roughness average (Ra) values of the specimens. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using repeated measures of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni post-hoc test at a 5% level of significance.\nResults: All materials exhibited a rougher surface after the first treatment period (10 days of exposure). The roughness of Group VM II continued to increase for up to 20 days. With the exception of Group LU, all groups exhibited a significantly rougher surface after 30 days of exposure compared to the baseline values (p < 0.05). The greatest variation in surface roughness was observed for the ceramic-based groups (VM II, EMP, and EMAX) rather than the hybrid groups (LU and VE).\nConclusion: Patients with ceramic-based CAD-CAM restorations should be careful during home-bleaching treatment, especially when repeated applications are involved. Hybrid materials, particularly Lava Ultimate, seem more resistant to the effects of repeated bleaching cycles than ceramic-based materials.\n \nHow to cite this article: \nÇölgeçen Ö, Köse M. Effects of repeated home bleaching on the surface roughness of CAD-CAM restoration materials. Int Dent Res 2022;12(3):143-8. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2022.vol12.no3.6\n \nLinguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.","PeriodicalId":31322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of repeated home bleaching on the surface roughness of CAD-CAM restoration materials\",\"authors\":\"Özlem Çölgeçen, Mehmet Köse\",\"doi\":\"10.5577/intdentres.2022.vol12.no3.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: This study aimed to investigate the effects of the repeated usage of a home-bleaching agent (16% carbamide peroxide) on the surface roughness of commonly used computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacture (CAD-CAM) restoration materials.\\nMethodology: Five different CAD-CAM restoration materials were used in this study: feldspathic ceramic (Vita Mark II—Group VM II), leucite-reinforced glass ceramic (IPS Empress CAD—Group EMP), lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramic (IPS e.max CAD—Group EMAX), polymer infiltrated network hybrid ceramic (Vita Enamic—Group VE), and resin nanoceramic (Lava Ultimate—Group LU). A home-bleaching agent containing 16% carbamide peroxide was applied in three repeated periods (10 days, 20 days, and 30 days of exposure). A surface profilometer was used to determine the roughness average (Ra) values of the specimens. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using repeated measures of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni post-hoc test at a 5% level of significance.\\nResults: All materials exhibited a rougher surface after the first treatment period (10 days of exposure). The roughness of Group VM II continued to increase for up to 20 days. With the exception of Group LU, all groups exhibited a significantly rougher surface after 30 days of exposure compared to the baseline values (p < 0.05). The greatest variation in surface roughness was observed for the ceramic-based groups (VM II, EMP, and EMAX) rather than the hybrid groups (LU and VE).\\nConclusion: Patients with ceramic-based CAD-CAM restorations should be careful during home-bleaching treatment, especially when repeated applications are involved. Hybrid materials, particularly Lava Ultimate, seem more resistant to the effects of repeated bleaching cycles than ceramic-based materials.\\n \\nHow to cite this article: \\nÇölgeçen Ö, Köse M. Effects of repeated home bleaching on the surface roughness of CAD-CAM restoration materials. Int Dent Res 2022;12(3):143-8. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2022.vol12.no3.6\\n \\nLinguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2022.vol12.no3.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2022.vol12.no3.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:研究重复使用家用漂白剂(16%过氧化脲)对常用CAD-CAM修复材料表面粗糙度的影响。方法:本研究采用五种不同的CAD-CAM修复材料:长石陶瓷(Vita Mark II - group VM II),白石增强玻璃陶瓷(IPS Empress CAD-Group EMP),二硅酸锂增强玻璃陶瓷(IPS e.max CAD-Group EMAX),聚合物渗透网络混合陶瓷(Vita Enamic-Group VE)和树脂纳米陶瓷(Lava Ultimate-Group LU)。一种含有16%过氧化脲的家用漂白剂在三个重复周期(暴露10天、20天和30天)中使用。用表面轮廓仪测定试样的粗糙度平均值(Ra)。所得资料采用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)和Bonferroni事后检验进行统计学分析,显著性水平为5%。结果:所有材料在第一个处理期(暴露10天)后表面均呈现粗糙。VM II组的粗糙度持续增加至20天。除LU组外,与基线值相比,暴露30天后,所有组的表面均显着粗糙(p < 0.05)。陶瓷基基团(VM II、EMP和EMAX)的表面粗糙度变化最大,而混合基团(LU和VE)的表面粗糙度变化最大。结论:使用陶瓷CAD-CAM修复体的患者在进行家庭漂白治疗时应谨慎,特别是在重复使用时。混合材料,特别是终极熔岩,似乎比陶瓷基材料更能抵抗反复漂白循环的影响。如何引用本文:Çölgeçen Ö, Köse M.反复家庭漂白对CAD-CAM修复材料表面粗糙度的影响。国际医学杂志,2018;12(3):143- 148。https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2022.vol12.no3.6语言修改:本手稿中的英语已由至少两名专业编辑检查,他们都是英语母语者。
Effects of repeated home bleaching on the surface roughness of CAD-CAM restoration materials
Aim: This study aimed to investigate the effects of the repeated usage of a home-bleaching agent (16% carbamide peroxide) on the surface roughness of commonly used computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacture (CAD-CAM) restoration materials.
Methodology: Five different CAD-CAM restoration materials were used in this study: feldspathic ceramic (Vita Mark II—Group VM II), leucite-reinforced glass ceramic (IPS Empress CAD—Group EMP), lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramic (IPS e.max CAD—Group EMAX), polymer infiltrated network hybrid ceramic (Vita Enamic—Group VE), and resin nanoceramic (Lava Ultimate—Group LU). A home-bleaching agent containing 16% carbamide peroxide was applied in three repeated periods (10 days, 20 days, and 30 days of exposure). A surface profilometer was used to determine the roughness average (Ra) values of the specimens. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using repeated measures of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni post-hoc test at a 5% level of significance.
Results: All materials exhibited a rougher surface after the first treatment period (10 days of exposure). The roughness of Group VM II continued to increase for up to 20 days. With the exception of Group LU, all groups exhibited a significantly rougher surface after 30 days of exposure compared to the baseline values (p < 0.05). The greatest variation in surface roughness was observed for the ceramic-based groups (VM II, EMP, and EMAX) rather than the hybrid groups (LU and VE).
Conclusion: Patients with ceramic-based CAD-CAM restorations should be careful during home-bleaching treatment, especially when repeated applications are involved. Hybrid materials, particularly Lava Ultimate, seem more resistant to the effects of repeated bleaching cycles than ceramic-based materials.
How to cite this article:
Çölgeçen Ö, Köse M. Effects of repeated home bleaching on the surface roughness of CAD-CAM restoration materials. Int Dent Res 2022;12(3):143-8. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2022.vol12.no3.6
Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.