需要在临床试验数据共享方面取得进一步进展:患者正在等待

S. Morris, Karla Childers, J. Berlin, J. Waldstreicher
{"title":"需要在临床试验数据共享方面取得进一步进展:患者正在等待","authors":"S. Morris, Karla Childers, J. Berlin, J. Waldstreicher","doi":"10.4155/CLI.15.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Johnson & Johnson vision for data sharing We believe in responsible sharing of clinical trial data that advances science and respects individual participants, who give their time and even take risks to contribute to medicine. In keeping with that belief, our company, Johnson & Johnson (NJ, USA), has established a data sharing agreement with the Yale Open Data Access Project, an independent academic institution, to review and decide, based on scientific merit, whether requests for access to our clinical trial data, for both pharmaceutical and medical device products, will be fulfilled [1]. Sharing clinical trial data has the potential to improve public health by providing a better understanding of physiology and pathophysiology, as well as both the benefits and risks of all types of treatments, including medicines and devices. Importantly, it also enables a powerful approach to address important questions that could not be addressed within individual studies by using either a combined analysis or metaanalysis, enabling a far deeper understanding of diseases, subgroups of patients who might respond differently and strengthening the evidence base for future studies, treatment guidelines, r egulatory, payer and medical decisions [2]. Recently, the Institute of Medicine released a comprehensive report, which offers recommendations for responsible data sharing and a vision of an ecosystem in which clinical trial data from all sources are more broadly accessible to the research community [3]. We support the Institute of Medicine’s recommendations and agree on the need to move forward, through multistakeholder groups, some of which are already working on various aspects of data transparency and approaches to harmonization, including the multiregional clinical trial forum [4] and TransCelerate [5]. We agree that the greatest value from data sharing efforts will only be realized if data sharing is agreed and embraced broadly. This will require all stakeholders who conduct clinical trials of all types and of all interventions to participate in data sharing, as well as an effort towards more common data collection tools and standards. Of course, all efforts have to be aimed at maintaining the highest possible scientific principles.","PeriodicalId":10369,"journal":{"name":"Clinical investigation","volume":"10 1","pages":"531-533"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The need for even further progress with clinical trial data sharing efforts: patients are waiting\",\"authors\":\"S. Morris, Karla Childers, J. Berlin, J. Waldstreicher\",\"doi\":\"10.4155/CLI.15.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Johnson & Johnson vision for data sharing We believe in responsible sharing of clinical trial data that advances science and respects individual participants, who give their time and even take risks to contribute to medicine. In keeping with that belief, our company, Johnson & Johnson (NJ, USA), has established a data sharing agreement with the Yale Open Data Access Project, an independent academic institution, to review and decide, based on scientific merit, whether requests for access to our clinical trial data, for both pharmaceutical and medical device products, will be fulfilled [1]. Sharing clinical trial data has the potential to improve public health by providing a better understanding of physiology and pathophysiology, as well as both the benefits and risks of all types of treatments, including medicines and devices. Importantly, it also enables a powerful approach to address important questions that could not be addressed within individual studies by using either a combined analysis or metaanalysis, enabling a far deeper understanding of diseases, subgroups of patients who might respond differently and strengthening the evidence base for future studies, treatment guidelines, r egulatory, payer and medical decisions [2]. Recently, the Institute of Medicine released a comprehensive report, which offers recommendations for responsible data sharing and a vision of an ecosystem in which clinical trial data from all sources are more broadly accessible to the research community [3]. We support the Institute of Medicine’s recommendations and agree on the need to move forward, through multistakeholder groups, some of which are already working on various aspects of data transparency and approaches to harmonization, including the multiregional clinical trial forum [4] and TransCelerate [5]. We agree that the greatest value from data sharing efforts will only be realized if data sharing is agreed and embraced broadly. This will require all stakeholders who conduct clinical trials of all types and of all interventions to participate in data sharing, as well as an effort towards more common data collection tools and standards. Of course, all efforts have to be aimed at maintaining the highest possible scientific principles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical investigation\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"531-533\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4155/CLI.15.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical investigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4155/CLI.15.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们相信,负责任的临床试验数据共享能够促进科学发展,并尊重每位参与者,他们为医学付出了时间,甚至承担了风险。本着这一信念,强生公司(NJ, USA)与独立学术机构耶鲁大学开放数据获取项目(Yale Open data Access Project)签订了数据共享协议,根据科学价值审查并决定是否满足获取我们的制药和医疗器械产品临床试验数据的请求[1]。共享临床试验数据有可能通过更好地了解生理学和病理生理学以及所有类型治疗(包括药物和设备)的益处和风险来改善公众健康。重要的是,它还提供了一种强大的方法来解决无法通过使用组合分析或荟萃分析在单个研究中解决的重要问题,从而能够更深入地了解疾病,可能有不同反应的患者亚组,并为未来的研究、治疗指南、监管、付款人和医疗决策加强证据基础[2]。最近,医学研究所发布了一份综合报告,提出了负责任的数据共享建议,并提出了一个生态系统的愿景,在这个生态系统中,来自所有来源的临床试验数据都可以更广泛地为研究界所获取[3]。我们支持医学研究所的建议,并同意有必要通过多方利益相关者团体向前推进,其中一些团体已经在研究数据透明度和协调方法的各个方面,包括多区域临床试验论坛[4]和transelerate[5]。我们一致认为,只有在数据共享得到广泛同意和接受的情况下,才能实现数据共享的最大价值。这将要求开展所有类型临床试验和所有干预措施的所有利益攸关方参与数据共享,并努力建立更通用的数据收集工具和标准。当然,所有的努力都必须以维护尽可能高的科学原则为目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The need for even further progress with clinical trial data sharing efforts: patients are waiting
The Johnson & Johnson vision for data sharing We believe in responsible sharing of clinical trial data that advances science and respects individual participants, who give their time and even take risks to contribute to medicine. In keeping with that belief, our company, Johnson & Johnson (NJ, USA), has established a data sharing agreement with the Yale Open Data Access Project, an independent academic institution, to review and decide, based on scientific merit, whether requests for access to our clinical trial data, for both pharmaceutical and medical device products, will be fulfilled [1]. Sharing clinical trial data has the potential to improve public health by providing a better understanding of physiology and pathophysiology, as well as both the benefits and risks of all types of treatments, including medicines and devices. Importantly, it also enables a powerful approach to address important questions that could not be addressed within individual studies by using either a combined analysis or metaanalysis, enabling a far deeper understanding of diseases, subgroups of patients who might respond differently and strengthening the evidence base for future studies, treatment guidelines, r egulatory, payer and medical decisions [2]. Recently, the Institute of Medicine released a comprehensive report, which offers recommendations for responsible data sharing and a vision of an ecosystem in which clinical trial data from all sources are more broadly accessible to the research community [3]. We support the Institute of Medicine’s recommendations and agree on the need to move forward, through multistakeholder groups, some of which are already working on various aspects of data transparency and approaches to harmonization, including the multiregional clinical trial forum [4] and TransCelerate [5]. We agree that the greatest value from data sharing efforts will only be realized if data sharing is agreed and embraced broadly. This will require all stakeholders who conduct clinical trials of all types and of all interventions to participate in data sharing, as well as an effort towards more common data collection tools and standards. Of course, all efforts have to be aimed at maintaining the highest possible scientific principles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Targeting TGF-beta pathway with COVID-19 Drug Candidate ARTIVeda/PulmoHeal Accelerates Recovery from Mild-Moderate COVID-19 A Prospective on Allergic Rhinitis Use of Cladribine for multiple sclerosis treatment: An image article Thalidomide may be an effective medicine for Blau Syndrome Prophylactic administration of a clinically safe low dose of the COVID-19 drug candidate Rejuveinix (RJX) effectively prevents fatal cytokine storm and mitigates inflammatory organ injury in a mouse model of sepsis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1