氮气驱提高页岩塞采收率潜力的实验与数值评价

Yang Yu, Xingbang Meng, James J. Sheng
{"title":"氮气驱提高页岩塞采收率潜力的实验与数值评价","authors":"Yang Yu,&nbsp;Xingbang Meng,&nbsp;James J. Sheng","doi":"10.1016/j.juogr.2016.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Production from tight formation resources leads to the growth in U.S. crude oil production. Compared with chemical flooding and water flooding, gas injection is a promising enhanced oil recovery (EOR) approach in shale reservoirs. A limited number of experimental studies concerning gas flooding in the literature have focused on unconventional plays. This paper presents experimental work for applying an immiscible N<sub>2</sub> flooding process in oil-saturated shale plugs. To investigate the effect of injection pressure on recovery performance, multiple core-flood tests were performed at the injection pressures of 1000<!--> <!-->psi, 3000<!--> <!-->psi, and 5000<!--> <!-->psi, respectively. A lab-scale numerical simulation model was built to match the experimental data. Based on this model, we conducted sensitive studies and analyzed the recovery process.</p><p>The potential of N<sub>2</sub> flooding for improving oil recovery from shale core plugs has been demonstrated by the experimental observations and simulation results. Under a certain injection pressure, the results show that the oil was produced with a high and stable production rate at the initial period of the recovery process, before gas breakthrough. After that, the incremental RF decreased with the increase of a flooding period, and a much longer time had less effect on extracting more oil. We also examined the effect of injection pressure on gas breakthrough time, ultimate RF, and oil recovery history. This study illustrates that gas flooding could be considered as an improved oil recover (IOR) approach in shale oil reservoirs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.juogr.2016.05.003","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental and numerical evaluation of the potential of improving oil recovery from shale plugs by nitrogen gas flooding\",\"authors\":\"Yang Yu,&nbsp;Xingbang Meng,&nbsp;James J. Sheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.juogr.2016.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Production from tight formation resources leads to the growth in U.S. crude oil production. Compared with chemical flooding and water flooding, gas injection is a promising enhanced oil recovery (EOR) approach in shale reservoirs. A limited number of experimental studies concerning gas flooding in the literature have focused on unconventional plays. This paper presents experimental work for applying an immiscible N<sub>2</sub> flooding process in oil-saturated shale plugs. To investigate the effect of injection pressure on recovery performance, multiple core-flood tests were performed at the injection pressures of 1000<!--> <!-->psi, 3000<!--> <!-->psi, and 5000<!--> <!-->psi, respectively. A lab-scale numerical simulation model was built to match the experimental data. Based on this model, we conducted sensitive studies and analyzed the recovery process.</p><p>The potential of N<sub>2</sub> flooding for improving oil recovery from shale core plugs has been demonstrated by the experimental observations and simulation results. Under a certain injection pressure, the results show that the oil was produced with a high and stable production rate at the initial period of the recovery process, before gas breakthrough. After that, the incremental RF decreased with the increase of a flooding period, and a much longer time had less effect on extracting more oil. We also examined the effect of injection pressure on gas breakthrough time, ultimate RF, and oil recovery history. This study illustrates that gas flooding could be considered as an improved oil recover (IOR) approach in shale oil reservoirs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.juogr.2016.05.003\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213397616300180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213397616300180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

致密地层资源的生产导致了美国原油产量的增长。与化学驱和水驱相比,注气是一种很有前途的页岩储层提高采收率的方法。文献中关于气驱的实验研究数量有限,主要集中在非常规油气藏上。本文介绍了在含油饱和页岩塞中应用非混相N2驱油工艺的实验工作。为了研究注入压力对采收率的影响,分别在注入压力为1000 psi、3000 psi和5000 psi的情况下进行了多次岩心驱油试验。建立了与实验数据相匹配的实验室规模数值模拟模型。基于该模型,我们进行了敏感性研究,并分析了采收率过程。实验观察和模拟结果证明了N2驱提高页岩岩心塞采收率的潜力。结果表明,在一定的注入压力下,采油初期,在天然气突破之前,采油速度高且稳定。之后,随着注水时间的增加,增量RF减小,且注水时间越长,对采出油的影响越小。我们还研究了注入压力对气体突破时间、最终RF和采收率历史的影响。研究表明,气驱是提高页岩油采收率的有效途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental and numerical evaluation of the potential of improving oil recovery from shale plugs by nitrogen gas flooding

Production from tight formation resources leads to the growth in U.S. crude oil production. Compared with chemical flooding and water flooding, gas injection is a promising enhanced oil recovery (EOR) approach in shale reservoirs. A limited number of experimental studies concerning gas flooding in the literature have focused on unconventional plays. This paper presents experimental work for applying an immiscible N2 flooding process in oil-saturated shale plugs. To investigate the effect of injection pressure on recovery performance, multiple core-flood tests were performed at the injection pressures of 1000 psi, 3000 psi, and 5000 psi, respectively. A lab-scale numerical simulation model was built to match the experimental data. Based on this model, we conducted sensitive studies and analyzed the recovery process.

The potential of N2 flooding for improving oil recovery from shale core plugs has been demonstrated by the experimental observations and simulation results. Under a certain injection pressure, the results show that the oil was produced with a high and stable production rate at the initial period of the recovery process, before gas breakthrough. After that, the incremental RF decreased with the increase of a flooding period, and a much longer time had less effect on extracting more oil. We also examined the effect of injection pressure on gas breakthrough time, ultimate RF, and oil recovery history. This study illustrates that gas flooding could be considered as an improved oil recover (IOR) approach in shale oil reservoirs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimization of huff-n-puff gas injection in a shale gas condensate reservoir Thermodynamics, kinetics and modeling of sorption behaviour of coalbed methane – A review A comprehensive review on characterization and modeling of thick capillary transition zones in carbonate reservoirs Steam trap control valve for enhancing steam flood performance in an Omani heterogeneous heavy oil field Estimation of pseudo-relative permeability curves through an analytical approach for steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) and solvent aided-steam assisted gravity drainage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1