不同英语水平大学生阅读过程中的母语思维

Tian Tian
{"title":"不同英语水平大学生阅读过程中的母语思维","authors":"Tian Tian","doi":"10.11648/J.ELLC.20200504.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper adopts think-aloud method to record the thinking process of Chinese college students of different levels when they are reading English materials. The think-aloud protocols are transcribed, and the L1 thinking in their reading process is analyzed. The results are as follows: Readers at different levels apply L1 thinking in their L2 reading process to deal with vocabulary and sentence in different ways. Readers in low-level and intermediate-level group rely heavily on L1 to deal with word meaning because of the limitation of their vocabulary yet readers in advanced-level group tend to use more L1 to associate semantic meaning in the process of L2 reading. Participants in advanced-level group usually read several of sentences and skim or scan information which is regard as not useful and import while participants in low-level and intermediate-level group usually read almost all the sentences and try to comprehend all of them regardless of their importance. In light of the findings generated by the study, teachers may have different perspectives while dealing with students’ reading activities. Since L1 thinking generally exists in the process of L2 reading, we should pay more attention to how to guide students to utilize L1 facilitating reading according to different students.","PeriodicalId":55896,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of English Language Literature and Culture","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"L1 Thinking in Reading Process of Chinese College Students at Different Levels of English Proficiency\",\"authors\":\"Tian Tian\",\"doi\":\"10.11648/J.ELLC.20200504.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper adopts think-aloud method to record the thinking process of Chinese college students of different levels when they are reading English materials. The think-aloud protocols are transcribed, and the L1 thinking in their reading process is analyzed. The results are as follows: Readers at different levels apply L1 thinking in their L2 reading process to deal with vocabulary and sentence in different ways. Readers in low-level and intermediate-level group rely heavily on L1 to deal with word meaning because of the limitation of their vocabulary yet readers in advanced-level group tend to use more L1 to associate semantic meaning in the process of L2 reading. Participants in advanced-level group usually read several of sentences and skim or scan information which is regard as not useful and import while participants in low-level and intermediate-level group usually read almost all the sentences and try to comprehend all of them regardless of their importance. In light of the findings generated by the study, teachers may have different perspectives while dealing with students’ reading activities. Since L1 thinking generally exists in the process of L2 reading, we should pay more attention to how to guide students to utilize L1 facilitating reading according to different students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baltic Journal of English Language Literature and Culture\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baltic Journal of English Language Literature and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.ELLC.20200504.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of English Language Literature and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.ELLC.20200504.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用有声思考的方法,记录了不同层次的中国大学生在阅读英语材料时的思维过程。对有声思维协议进行转录,并分析其阅读过程中的母语思维。结果表明:不同水平的读者在二语阅读过程中运用母语思维处理词汇和句子的方式不同。低、中级水平组的读者由于词汇量有限,严重依赖母语来处理词义,而高水平组的读者在二语阅读过程中倾向于更多地使用母语来联想语义。高水平组的参与者通常会阅读几个句子,并略读或浏览那些被认为没有用和不重要的信息,而低水平和中级组的参与者通常会阅读几乎所有的句子,并试图理解所有的句子,而不考虑它们的重要性。根据研究结果,教师在处理学生的阅读活动时可能会有不同的观点。由于母语思维普遍存在于第二语言阅读过程中,我们应该更加关注如何根据不同的学生引导学生利用母语促进阅读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
L1 Thinking in Reading Process of Chinese College Students at Different Levels of English Proficiency
The paper adopts think-aloud method to record the thinking process of Chinese college students of different levels when they are reading English materials. The think-aloud protocols are transcribed, and the L1 thinking in their reading process is analyzed. The results are as follows: Readers at different levels apply L1 thinking in their L2 reading process to deal with vocabulary and sentence in different ways. Readers in low-level and intermediate-level group rely heavily on L1 to deal with word meaning because of the limitation of their vocabulary yet readers in advanced-level group tend to use more L1 to associate semantic meaning in the process of L2 reading. Participants in advanced-level group usually read several of sentences and skim or scan information which is regard as not useful and import while participants in low-level and intermediate-level group usually read almost all the sentences and try to comprehend all of them regardless of their importance. In light of the findings generated by the study, teachers may have different perspectives while dealing with students’ reading activities. Since L1 thinking generally exists in the process of L2 reading, we should pay more attention to how to guide students to utilize L1 facilitating reading according to different students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
POWER AND MANIPULATION DEPICTED BY MILES BRON IN GLASS ONION (2022) ELICITATION TECHNIQUE EMPLOYED BY EFL TEACHERS IN MOTIVATING JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS TO SPEAK A SOCIOPRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE SPEECH ACT OF REQUESTING IN LOCAL ENGLISH COURSEBOOKS THE CULTURAL IDENTITY OF NUSANTARA IN A MOVIE "RAYA AND THE LAST DRAGON “ FUNCTIONS OF SPEECH ACTS IN AUSTRALIAN MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS SPEECH AT UNGA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1