睫状体麻痹对白内障患者IOLMaster 700和OA-2000生物测量的影响

Yuyu Zhao, Zhongxing Chen, Luting Pan, Qing Wang, Fan Zhang
{"title":"睫状体麻痹对白内障患者IOLMaster 700和OA-2000生物测量的影响","authors":"Yuyu Zhao, Zhongxing Chen, Luting Pan, Qing Wang, Fan Zhang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: \nTo evaluate the effect of cycloplegiaon new ocular biometry measurements using the IOLMaster 700 and OA-2000 biometers and assess the differences and agreements between the two devices. \n \n \nMethods: \nIn this prospective, comparative, observational study of ocular measurements on 133 cataracts, measurements of axial length (AL), mean keratometry (Km), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness (CCT) and white-to-white (WTW) were performed by a single operator using the two devices before and after pupil dilation. The measurement order of the two devices was determined according to the random number table. A paired t-test was applied to evaluate the differences with and without cycloplegia on each device. Bland-Altman plots and a paired t-test were used to evaluate the agreements and differences between the two devices with and without cycloplegia. \n \n \nResults: \nCycloplegia had no significant effect on AL or Km. However, ACD and CCT significantly increased by 0.06 mm and 2-3 μm post-cycloplegia on both devices. The IOLMaster 700 LT measurements significantly decreased by 0.01 mm (t=-6.26, P<0.001) and WTW increased by 0.12 mm (t=7.06, P<0.001) after pupil dilation. ACD measurements with OA-2000 were higher by 0.04 mm (t=-13.36, P<0.001; t=-15.08, P<0.001) and LT by 0.07 mm (t=-11.11, P<0.001; t=-8.42, P<0.001), which were statistically significant, compared to the IOLMaster 700 before and after pupil dilation, while CCT was smaller by 17 μm (t=30.55, P<0.001; t=28.80, P<0.001). The 95% limits of agreement in both devices were -0.79 to 0.81 mm pre-cycloplegia and -0.44 to 0.81 mm post-cycloplegia. All measurements had good agreements between the two devices, except for WTW. \n \n \nConclusions: \nCycloplegia affects ACD and CCT, but not AL or Km measurements. LT decreased and WTW increased on the IOLMaster 700 after pupil dilation. Generally, there is good agreement between the IOLMaster 700 and OA-2000, except for WTW. Thus, either can be used for the preoperative examination of cataracts. \n \n \nKey words: \nIOLMaster 700; OA-2000; cataract; cycloplegia","PeriodicalId":10142,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","volume":"31 1","pages":"481-487"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Cycloplegia on the IOLMaster 700 and OA-2000 Biometry in Cataract Patients\",\"authors\":\"Yuyu Zhao, Zhongxing Chen, Luting Pan, Qing Wang, Fan Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: \\nTo evaluate the effect of cycloplegiaon new ocular biometry measurements using the IOLMaster 700 and OA-2000 biometers and assess the differences and agreements between the two devices. \\n \\n \\nMethods: \\nIn this prospective, comparative, observational study of ocular measurements on 133 cataracts, measurements of axial length (AL), mean keratometry (Km), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness (CCT) and white-to-white (WTW) were performed by a single operator using the two devices before and after pupil dilation. The measurement order of the two devices was determined according to the random number table. A paired t-test was applied to evaluate the differences with and without cycloplegia on each device. Bland-Altman plots and a paired t-test were used to evaluate the agreements and differences between the two devices with and without cycloplegia. \\n \\n \\nResults: \\nCycloplegia had no significant effect on AL or Km. However, ACD and CCT significantly increased by 0.06 mm and 2-3 μm post-cycloplegia on both devices. The IOLMaster 700 LT measurements significantly decreased by 0.01 mm (t=-6.26, P<0.001) and WTW increased by 0.12 mm (t=7.06, P<0.001) after pupil dilation. ACD measurements with OA-2000 were higher by 0.04 mm (t=-13.36, P<0.001; t=-15.08, P<0.001) and LT by 0.07 mm (t=-11.11, P<0.001; t=-8.42, P<0.001), which were statistically significant, compared to the IOLMaster 700 before and after pupil dilation, while CCT was smaller by 17 μm (t=30.55, P<0.001; t=28.80, P<0.001). The 95% limits of agreement in both devices were -0.79 to 0.81 mm pre-cycloplegia and -0.44 to 0.81 mm post-cycloplegia. All measurements had good agreements between the two devices, except for WTW. \\n \\n \\nConclusions: \\nCycloplegia affects ACD and CCT, but not AL or Km measurements. LT decreased and WTW increased on the IOLMaster 700 after pupil dilation. Generally, there is good agreement between the IOLMaster 700 and OA-2000, except for WTW. Thus, either can be used for the preoperative examination of cataracts. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nIOLMaster 700; OA-2000; cataract; cycloplegia\",\"PeriodicalId\":10142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"481-487\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.07.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.07.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:评价睫状体麻痹对使用IOLMaster 700和OA-2000生物计进行眼部生物测量的影响,并评估两者之间的差异和一致性。方法:本研究对133例白内障患者进行了前瞻性、对比性、观察性研究,在瞳孔扩张前后,由一名操作员分别使用这两种仪器测量眼轴长(AL)、平均角膜度数(Km)、前房深度(ACD)、晶状体厚度(LT)、角膜中央厚度(CCT)和白对白(WTW)。根据随机数表确定两个装置的测量顺序。采用配对t检验来评估每种设备上有和没有独眼麻痹的差异。使用Bland-Altman图和配对t检验来评估两种装置在患有和不患有独眼麻痹的情况下的一致性和差异。结果:单眼截瘫对AL和Km均无显著影响。然而,两种装置的ACD和CCT均显著增加0.06 mm和2-3 μm。瞳孔扩张后IOLMaster 700 LT测量值显著降低0.01 mm (t=-6.26, P<0.001), WTW升高0.12 mm (t=7.06, P<0.001)。OA-2000的ACD测量值高出0.04 mm (t=-13.36, P<0.001;t=-15.08, P<0.001), LT降低0.07 mm (t=-11.11, P<0.001;t=-8.42, P<0.001),与瞳孔扩张前后的IOLMaster 700相比,差异有统计学意义,而CCT则小17 μm (t=30.55, P<0.001;t = 28.80, P < 0.001)。两种器械的95%一致性限分别为-0.79 ~ 0.81 mm前和-0.44 ~ 0.81 mm后。除了WTW之外,两个设备之间的所有测量结果都很吻合。结论:睫状体麻痹影响ACD和CCT,但不影响AL和Km测量。瞳孔扩张后IOLMaster 700的LT降低,WTW升高。一般来说,IOLMaster 700和OA-2000之间有很好的一致性,除了WTW。因此,两种方法均可用于白内障术前检查。关键词:IOLMaster 700;oa - 2000;白内障;睫状肌麻痹
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effect of Cycloplegia on the IOLMaster 700 and OA-2000 Biometry in Cataract Patients
Objective: To evaluate the effect of cycloplegiaon new ocular biometry measurements using the IOLMaster 700 and OA-2000 biometers and assess the differences and agreements between the two devices. Methods: In this prospective, comparative, observational study of ocular measurements on 133 cataracts, measurements of axial length (AL), mean keratometry (Km), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness (CCT) and white-to-white (WTW) were performed by a single operator using the two devices before and after pupil dilation. The measurement order of the two devices was determined according to the random number table. A paired t-test was applied to evaluate the differences with and without cycloplegia on each device. Bland-Altman plots and a paired t-test were used to evaluate the agreements and differences between the two devices with and without cycloplegia. Results: Cycloplegia had no significant effect on AL or Km. However, ACD and CCT significantly increased by 0.06 mm and 2-3 μm post-cycloplegia on both devices. The IOLMaster 700 LT measurements significantly decreased by 0.01 mm (t=-6.26, P<0.001) and WTW increased by 0.12 mm (t=7.06, P<0.001) after pupil dilation. ACD measurements with OA-2000 were higher by 0.04 mm (t=-13.36, P<0.001; t=-15.08, P<0.001) and LT by 0.07 mm (t=-11.11, P<0.001; t=-8.42, P<0.001), which were statistically significant, compared to the IOLMaster 700 before and after pupil dilation, while CCT was smaller by 17 μm (t=30.55, P<0.001; t=28.80, P<0.001). The 95% limits of agreement in both devices were -0.79 to 0.81 mm pre-cycloplegia and -0.44 to 0.81 mm post-cycloplegia. All measurements had good agreements between the two devices, except for WTW. Conclusions: Cycloplegia affects ACD and CCT, but not AL or Km measurements. LT decreased and WTW increased on the IOLMaster 700 after pupil dilation. Generally, there is good agreement between the IOLMaster 700 and OA-2000, except for WTW. Thus, either can be used for the preoperative examination of cataracts. Key words: IOLMaster 700; OA-2000; cataract; cycloplegia
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Practice and Effectiveness of COVID-19 RNA Detection in the Prevention and Control of Ophthalmic Hospital Correct Choice of Goggles and Anti-fog Guidance Duringthe Epidemic Period of COVID-19 2019-nCoV and Eye, What We Know and What We Should Do Clinical Application Value of a Preset Marking Line in Lacrimal Endoscopic Surgery Characteristics of Macular Microvascular Changes in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1