不确定数据模型校正的正反方法*

L. G. Crespo
{"title":"不确定数据模型校正的正反方法*","authors":"L. G. Crespo","doi":"10.1109/SMC42975.2020.9283230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article proposes a framework for calibrating parametric models according to data subject to uncertainty. Data uncertainty might be caused by a poor metrology system, measurement noise, model-form uncertainty or by the inability to directly measure the inputs and/or outputs of interest. The formulations developed, called Forward Maximum Likelihood (FML) and Inverse Maximum Likelihood (IML), are applicable to datasets with and without uncertainty. The FML approach performs the calibration in the space of the model’s output thereby requiring repeated model simulations. Conversely, the IML approach leverages an ensemble of solutions to an inverse problem in order to perform the calibration in the space of the model’s parameters. The potential loss of performance incurred by the IML approach is often justified by a sizable reduction in computational cost. In addition, we use chance-constrained optimization to eliminate the effects of outliers on the calibrated model. This practice yields a model that increases the likelihood of most of the data in exchange for a reduction in the likelihood of a few of the worst-performing data points. Metrics for evaluating the benefits and risks of outlier elimination are also presented.","PeriodicalId":6718,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)","volume":"452 1","pages":"64-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forward and Inverse Approaches to Model Calibration for Uncertain Data *\",\"authors\":\"L. G. Crespo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SMC42975.2020.9283230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article proposes a framework for calibrating parametric models according to data subject to uncertainty. Data uncertainty might be caused by a poor metrology system, measurement noise, model-form uncertainty or by the inability to directly measure the inputs and/or outputs of interest. The formulations developed, called Forward Maximum Likelihood (FML) and Inverse Maximum Likelihood (IML), are applicable to datasets with and without uncertainty. The FML approach performs the calibration in the space of the model’s output thereby requiring repeated model simulations. Conversely, the IML approach leverages an ensemble of solutions to an inverse problem in order to perform the calibration in the space of the model’s parameters. The potential loss of performance incurred by the IML approach is often justified by a sizable reduction in computational cost. In addition, we use chance-constrained optimization to eliminate the effects of outliers on the calibrated model. This practice yields a model that increases the likelihood of most of the data in exchange for a reduction in the likelihood of a few of the worst-performing data points. Metrics for evaluating the benefits and risks of outlier elimination are also presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)\",\"volume\":\"452 1\",\"pages\":\"64-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC42975.2020.9283230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC42975.2020.9283230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文提出了一种根据不确定性数据校准参数模型的框架。数据不确定度可能是由不良的计量系统、测量噪声、模型形式不确定度或无法直接测量感兴趣的输入和/或输出引起的。所开发的公式称为前向最大似然(FML)和逆最大似然(IML),适用于具有和不具有不确定性的数据集。FML方法在模型输出的空间中执行校准,因此需要重复的模型模拟。相反,IML方法利用反问题的解的集合,以便在模型参数的空间中执行校准。IML方法带来的潜在性能损失通常可以通过计算成本的大幅降低来证明。此外,我们使用机会约束优化来消除异常值对校准模型的影响。这种做法产生了一个模型,该模型增加了大多数数据的可能性,以减少少数表现最差的数据点的可能性。还提出了评估异常值消除的益处和风险的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Forward and Inverse Approaches to Model Calibration for Uncertain Data *
This article proposes a framework for calibrating parametric models according to data subject to uncertainty. Data uncertainty might be caused by a poor metrology system, measurement noise, model-form uncertainty or by the inability to directly measure the inputs and/or outputs of interest. The formulations developed, called Forward Maximum Likelihood (FML) and Inverse Maximum Likelihood (IML), are applicable to datasets with and without uncertainty. The FML approach performs the calibration in the space of the model’s output thereby requiring repeated model simulations. Conversely, the IML approach leverages an ensemble of solutions to an inverse problem in order to perform the calibration in the space of the model’s parameters. The potential loss of performance incurred by the IML approach is often justified by a sizable reduction in computational cost. In addition, we use chance-constrained optimization to eliminate the effects of outliers on the calibrated model. This practice yields a model that increases the likelihood of most of the data in exchange for a reduction in the likelihood of a few of the worst-performing data points. Metrics for evaluating the benefits and risks of outlier elimination are also presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
At-the-Edge Data Processing for Low Latency High Throughput Machine Learning Algorithms Machine Learning for First Principles Calculations of Material Properties for Ferromagnetic Materials Mobility Aware Computation Offloading Model for Edge Computing Toward an Autonomous Workflow for Single Crystal Neutron Diffraction Virtual Infrastructure Twins: Software Testing Platforms for Computing-Instrument Ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1