在印度尼西亚作为预审诉讼的基础:在Formil或材料之间

P. Setiawan, Xavier Nugraha, M. Taufiqurrohman
{"title":"在印度尼西亚作为预审诉讼的基础:在Formil或材料之间","authors":"P. Setiawan, Xavier Nugraha, M. Taufiqurrohman","doi":"10.24090/volksgeist.v3i2.4125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to answer what is the scope of pretrial in statutory regulations and whether expiration can be used as an excuse to file a pretrial lawsuit. By using legal research methods through statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, this article concludes that the absence of a clear categorization regarding the formal and material aspects of the expiration case creates a dilemma. In its development, expiration has begun to be recognized as a formal reason which incidentally does not touch the subject matter of the case, an thus can be used as a pretrial excuse. This can be seen in the Pre-trial Decision Number: 143/Pid.Prap/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel. Ultimately, this article suggests the need for a clear regulation in the Perma regarding the categorization of formal and material aspects in pretrial hearings.","PeriodicalId":34760,"journal":{"name":"Volksgeist","volume":"177 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Penggunaan Daluwarsa sebagai Dasar Gugatan Praperadilan di Indonesia: Antara Formil atau Materiil\",\"authors\":\"P. Setiawan, Xavier Nugraha, M. Taufiqurrohman\",\"doi\":\"10.24090/volksgeist.v3i2.4125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to answer what is the scope of pretrial in statutory regulations and whether expiration can be used as an excuse to file a pretrial lawsuit. By using legal research methods through statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, this article concludes that the absence of a clear categorization regarding the formal and material aspects of the expiration case creates a dilemma. In its development, expiration has begun to be recognized as a formal reason which incidentally does not touch the subject matter of the case, an thus can be used as a pretrial excuse. This can be seen in the Pre-trial Decision Number: 143/Pid.Prap/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel. Ultimately, this article suggests the need for a clear regulation in the Perma regarding the categorization of formal and material aspects in pretrial hearings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volksgeist\",\"volume\":\"177 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volksgeist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v3i2.4125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volksgeist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v3i2.4125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文旨在回答法律规定的审前范围是什么,过期是否可以作为提起审前诉讼的理由。通过使用法律研究方法,通过法定、概念和基于案例的方法,本文得出结论,关于到期案件的形式和物质方面缺乏明确的分类造成了一个困境。在其发展过程中,期满已开始被认为是一种偶然不触及案件主题的形式理由,因此可以用作审前借口。这可以在预审决定编号:143/Pid.Prap/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel中看到。最后,本文建议有必要在《宪法》中明确规定审前听证的正式方面和实质性方面的分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Penggunaan Daluwarsa sebagai Dasar Gugatan Praperadilan di Indonesia: Antara Formil atau Materiil
This article aims to answer what is the scope of pretrial in statutory regulations and whether expiration can be used as an excuse to file a pretrial lawsuit. By using legal research methods through statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, this article concludes that the absence of a clear categorization regarding the formal and material aspects of the expiration case creates a dilemma. In its development, expiration has begun to be recognized as a formal reason which incidentally does not touch the subject matter of the case, an thus can be used as a pretrial excuse. This can be seen in the Pre-trial Decision Number: 143/Pid.Prap/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel. Ultimately, this article suggests the need for a clear regulation in the Perma regarding the categorization of formal and material aspects in pretrial hearings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Political Configuration of Electoral System Law in Indonesia from State Administration Perspective Legal Protection for Wife and Child as Consequence of Head of Family’s Criminal Imprisonment Enforcement The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) Concept as an Attempt for Protection of Human Rights in International Humanitarian Law Context Fulfilling Communal Rights through the Implementation of the Second Principle of Pancasila towards the Regulation on Agrarian Reform Justice Collaborator’s Position and Function on Witness Protection’s Rights as a Suspect from the Perspective of Criminal Law in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1