食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统中与DPP-4抑制剂相关的横纹肌溶解风险的歧化分析

Wen-ping Shi, L. Ba, Zhi-ming Sun
{"title":"食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统中与DPP-4抑制剂相关的横纹肌溶解风险的歧化分析","authors":"Wen-ping Shi, L. Ba, Zhi-ming Sun","doi":"10.35248/2329-6887.20.8.295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Backgrounds: Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4is) are widely used in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recently safety report from regulatory agency suggested DPP4is may be associated with rhabdomyolysis, thus we performed a detailed analysis and evaluated the association between DPP4is and rhabdomyolysis in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: We examined the FAERS database from 2004q1 to 2017q3 (for a total of 9,906,642 reports), calculated the rates of rhabdomyolysis within the reports for DPP4is and reports for other drugs. After filtering concomitant drugs, we compared proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) among adverse events (AE) reports that listed DPP4is with and without these moderator drugs, to identify whether rhabdomyolysis is associated with the use of DPP4is alone. Results: 536 rhabdomyolysis AE reports involving DPP4is and 28462 reports involving other drugs were retrieved, the crude PRR for rhabdomyolysis associated with DPP4is was 2.06 (95%CI: 1.89-2.24). After filtering the moderator drugs, the PRR was 2.49 (95%CI: 2.08-2.98). Subanalysis showed PRR of alogliptin (11.89, 95%CI: 6.77-20.87) was higher than other gliptins and PRRs in elderly people were higher than that in working age population, regarding male or female. Conclusions: Based on this pharmacovigilance analysis, DPP4is may associated with rhabdomyolysis independently, especially alogliptin. DPP4is associated rhabdomyolysis are more likely happened on elderly people which needed to be noted in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":16958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacovigilance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Disproportionality Analysis of the Risk of Rhabdomyolysis Associated with DPP-4 Inhibitors in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System\",\"authors\":\"Wen-ping Shi, L. Ba, Zhi-ming Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.35248/2329-6887.20.8.295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Backgrounds: Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4is) are widely used in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recently safety report from regulatory agency suggested DPP4is may be associated with rhabdomyolysis, thus we performed a detailed analysis and evaluated the association between DPP4is and rhabdomyolysis in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: We examined the FAERS database from 2004q1 to 2017q3 (for a total of 9,906,642 reports), calculated the rates of rhabdomyolysis within the reports for DPP4is and reports for other drugs. After filtering concomitant drugs, we compared proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) among adverse events (AE) reports that listed DPP4is with and without these moderator drugs, to identify whether rhabdomyolysis is associated with the use of DPP4is alone. Results: 536 rhabdomyolysis AE reports involving DPP4is and 28462 reports involving other drugs were retrieved, the crude PRR for rhabdomyolysis associated with DPP4is was 2.06 (95%CI: 1.89-2.24). After filtering the moderator drugs, the PRR was 2.49 (95%CI: 2.08-2.98). Subanalysis showed PRR of alogliptin (11.89, 95%CI: 6.77-20.87) was higher than other gliptins and PRRs in elderly people were higher than that in working age population, regarding male or female. Conclusions: Based on this pharmacovigilance analysis, DPP4is may associated with rhabdomyolysis independently, especially alogliptin. DPP4is associated rhabdomyolysis are more likely happened on elderly people which needed to be noted in clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacovigilance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacovigilance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35248/2329-6887.20.8.295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacovigilance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2329-6887.20.8.295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(DPP4is)广泛应用于2型糖尿病患者。最近来自监管机构的安全报告表明dpp4可能与横纹肌溶解有关,因此我们在美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)中进行了详细的分析和评估dpp4与横纹肌溶解之间的关系。方法:我们检查了2004年第一季度至2017年第三季度FAERS数据库(共9,906,642份报告),计算了DPP4is报告和其他药物报告中的横纹肌溶解率。在过滤了伴随药物后,我们比较了列出DPP4is的不良事件(AE)报告的比例报告比(PRRs),以确定横纹肌溶解是否与单独使用DPP4is有关。结果:共检索到DPP4is相关横纹肌溶解AE报告536例,其他药物相关横纹肌溶解AE报告28462例,DPP4is相关横纹肌溶解的粗PRR为2.06 (95%CI: 1.89 ~ 2.24)。过滤抑制药物后,PRR为2.49 (95%CI: 2.08 ~ 2.98)。亚分析显示,阿格列汀的PRR (11.89, 95%CI: 6.77 ~ 20.87)高于其他格列汀类药物,老年人PRR高于工作年龄人群,无论男女。结论:基于本药物警戒分析,dpp4可能与横纹肌溶解独立相关,尤其是阿格列汀。dpp4相关的横纹肌溶解多发生在老年人身上,这在临床实践中值得注意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Disproportionality Analysis of the Risk of Rhabdomyolysis Associated with DPP-4 Inhibitors in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System
Backgrounds: Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4is) are widely used in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recently safety report from regulatory agency suggested DPP4is may be associated with rhabdomyolysis, thus we performed a detailed analysis and evaluated the association between DPP4is and rhabdomyolysis in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: We examined the FAERS database from 2004q1 to 2017q3 (for a total of 9,906,642 reports), calculated the rates of rhabdomyolysis within the reports for DPP4is and reports for other drugs. After filtering concomitant drugs, we compared proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) among adverse events (AE) reports that listed DPP4is with and without these moderator drugs, to identify whether rhabdomyolysis is associated with the use of DPP4is alone. Results: 536 rhabdomyolysis AE reports involving DPP4is and 28462 reports involving other drugs were retrieved, the crude PRR for rhabdomyolysis associated with DPP4is was 2.06 (95%CI: 1.89-2.24). After filtering the moderator drugs, the PRR was 2.49 (95%CI: 2.08-2.98). Subanalysis showed PRR of alogliptin (11.89, 95%CI: 6.77-20.87) was higher than other gliptins and PRRs in elderly people were higher than that in working age population, regarding male or female. Conclusions: Based on this pharmacovigilance analysis, DPP4is may associated with rhabdomyolysis independently, especially alogliptin. DPP4is associated rhabdomyolysis are more likely happened on elderly people which needed to be noted in clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Drug Safety Monitoring in Health Programs of Cameroon. A Concise Outline on Measure behind Inoculation A Note on Medical Management of Uveitis Comparison of Traditional Medicine and Modern Medicine from Natural Products A Note on Protocol Writing In Clinical Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1