作为启蒙运动产物的五旬节派

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION Pneuma Pub Date : 2022-12-20 DOI:10.1163/15700747-bja10074
J. Poirier
{"title":"作为启蒙运动产物的五旬节派","authors":"J. Poirier","doi":"10.1163/15700747-bja10074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Nothing has been more foundational within pentecostal scholarship than the idea that Pentecostalism is necessarily opposed to “modernism” and/or “Enlightenment thinking.” And yet an unmistakably “modernist” strain of thought lies behind several central pentecostal commitments. This article traces Pentecostalism’s debt to the English Enlightenment’s encounter with the miraculous and to John Wesley’s reception of Lockean empiricism, and traces in outline the empiricist shape of a true pentecostal epistemology. It shows that early pentecostal rhetoric used the term “modernism” strictly to denote liberalism, so that recent efforts to aim this rhetoric against modernist commitments as defined vis-à-vis postmodernism cannot legitimately claim continuity with the early Pentecostals. All things considered, Pentecostalism owes a greater debt to Enlightenment thought than do many streams of Evangelicalism.","PeriodicalId":43699,"journal":{"name":"Pneuma","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pentecostalism as a Product of the Enlightenment\",\"authors\":\"J. Poirier\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15700747-bja10074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Nothing has been more foundational within pentecostal scholarship than the idea that Pentecostalism is necessarily opposed to “modernism” and/or “Enlightenment thinking.” And yet an unmistakably “modernist” strain of thought lies behind several central pentecostal commitments. This article traces Pentecostalism’s debt to the English Enlightenment’s encounter with the miraculous and to John Wesley’s reception of Lockean empiricism, and traces in outline the empiricist shape of a true pentecostal epistemology. It shows that early pentecostal rhetoric used the term “modernism” strictly to denote liberalism, so that recent efforts to aim this rhetoric against modernist commitments as defined vis-à-vis postmodernism cannot legitimately claim continuity with the early Pentecostals. All things considered, Pentecostalism owes a greater debt to Enlightenment thought than do many streams of Evangelicalism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pneuma\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pneuma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700747-bja10074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pneuma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700747-bja10074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在五旬节派学术中,没有什么比五旬节派必然反对“现代主义”和/或“启蒙思想”这一观点更基础的了。然而,在五旬节派的几个核心承诺背后,有一种明显的“现代主义”思想。本文追溯了五旬节派对英国启蒙运动与奇迹的相遇,以及约翰·卫斯理对洛克经验主义的接受,并概述了真正五旬节派认识论的经验主义形态。它表明,早期五旬节派的修辞使用术语“现代主义”严格地表示自由主义,因此,最近的努力旨在反对现代主义的承诺,如-à-vis后现代主义所定义的,不能合法地声称与早期五旬节派的连续性。考虑到所有的事情,五旬节派对启蒙思想的贡献比福音派的许多分支都要大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pentecostalism as a Product of the Enlightenment
Nothing has been more foundational within pentecostal scholarship than the idea that Pentecostalism is necessarily opposed to “modernism” and/or “Enlightenment thinking.” And yet an unmistakably “modernist” strain of thought lies behind several central pentecostal commitments. This article traces Pentecostalism’s debt to the English Enlightenment’s encounter with the miraculous and to John Wesley’s reception of Lockean empiricism, and traces in outline the empiricist shape of a true pentecostal epistemology. It shows that early pentecostal rhetoric used the term “modernism” strictly to denote liberalism, so that recent efforts to aim this rhetoric against modernist commitments as defined vis-à-vis postmodernism cannot legitimately claim continuity with the early Pentecostals. All things considered, Pentecostalism owes a greater debt to Enlightenment thought than do many streams of Evangelicalism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pneuma
Pneuma RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Commission, Mission and Migration in Acts Is Acts Really “The Most Overtly Missionary Book”? Reading the Pentecostal Interpretations of the Book of Acts Contrapuntally Tongues of Fire: Giving Voice to Pentecostal Theology Vindicating Spirit, Deceiving Spirits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1