非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)对前庭病变的影响:一项系统综述

IF 0.3 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Hearing Balance and Communication Pub Date : 2022-04-29 DOI:10.1080/21695717.2022.2067721
Bruno Henrique de Souza Fonseca, Pedro Henrique Sousa de Andrade, Otávio Borges, Jessica Mariana de Aquino Miranda, R. Bazan, L. P. S. D. de Souza, Gustavo José Luvizutto
{"title":"非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)对前庭病变的影响:一项系统综述","authors":"Bruno Henrique de Souza Fonseca, Pedro Henrique Sousa de Andrade, Otávio Borges, Jessica Mariana de Aquino Miranda, R. Bazan, L. P. S. D. de Souza, Gustavo José Luvizutto","doi":"10.1080/21695717.2022.2067721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives New types of treatments have emerged, such as non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), to treat chronic vestibular dysfunction (VD). Considering that NIBS is a promising approach to reduce VD symptoms, this review was aimed to analyze the effects of NIBS in patients with VD. Methods We adhered to the methods described in the Cochrane Handbook for Intervention Reviews. The eligibility criteria were as follows: (a) individuals with vestibulopathy having clinical and neuroimaging; (b) Interventions: non-invasive brain stimulation, this intervention comprised transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); (c) Control: any comparison or sham; and (d) Outcomes: dizziness and balance. We included randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies from July 2004 to February 2020. We searched the PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, and Ovid databases. Two pairs of reviewers independently screened all titles and abstracts. Two authors assessed the risk of bias for each study using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to rate the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. Results We identified 136 studies, and included two studies. Both studies used tDCS application. One study used anodal cerebellar tDCS or sham at 2 mA for 25 min associated with vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT), and the other study used anodal tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (F3) for 25–30 min associated with VRT at home. Both studies showed clinical improvement in the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC), and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores. Both studies presented higher-quality evidence on the GRADE scale and a low risk of bias. Conclusions Based on two studies, anodal tDCS over F3 or the cerebellum associated with VRT improved chronic vestibular symptoms.","PeriodicalId":43765,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Balance and Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on vestibulopathy disorders: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Bruno Henrique de Souza Fonseca, Pedro Henrique Sousa de Andrade, Otávio Borges, Jessica Mariana de Aquino Miranda, R. Bazan, L. P. S. D. de Souza, Gustavo José Luvizutto\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21695717.2022.2067721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives New types of treatments have emerged, such as non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), to treat chronic vestibular dysfunction (VD). Considering that NIBS is a promising approach to reduce VD symptoms, this review was aimed to analyze the effects of NIBS in patients with VD. Methods We adhered to the methods described in the Cochrane Handbook for Intervention Reviews. The eligibility criteria were as follows: (a) individuals with vestibulopathy having clinical and neuroimaging; (b) Interventions: non-invasive brain stimulation, this intervention comprised transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); (c) Control: any comparison or sham; and (d) Outcomes: dizziness and balance. We included randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies from July 2004 to February 2020. We searched the PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, and Ovid databases. Two pairs of reviewers independently screened all titles and abstracts. Two authors assessed the risk of bias for each study using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to rate the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. Results We identified 136 studies, and included two studies. Both studies used tDCS application. One study used anodal cerebellar tDCS or sham at 2 mA for 25 min associated with vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT), and the other study used anodal tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (F3) for 25–30 min associated with VRT at home. Both studies showed clinical improvement in the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC), and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores. Both studies presented higher-quality evidence on the GRADE scale and a low risk of bias. Conclusions Based on two studies, anodal tDCS over F3 or the cerebellum associated with VRT improved chronic vestibular symptoms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hearing Balance and Communication\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hearing Balance and Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21695717.2022.2067721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Balance and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21695717.2022.2067721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【摘要】目的非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)等治疗慢性前庭功能障碍(VD)的新方法已经出现。考虑到NIBS是一种很有前景的减少VD症状的方法,本综述旨在分析NIBS对VD患者的影响。方法我们遵循Cochrane干预评价手册中描述的方法。入选标准如下:(a)有临床和神经影像学检查的前庭病变患者;(b)干预:非侵入性脑刺激,该干预包括经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS);(c)控制:任何比较或虚假;(d)结果:头晕和平衡。我们纳入了2004年7月至2020年2月的随机对照试验和非随机研究。我们检索了PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science、Scopus、Cochrane和Ovid数据库。两对审稿人独立筛选了所有标题和摘要。两位作者使用《Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册》中概述的标准评估了每项研究的偏倚风险,并使用推荐评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)方法对每个结果的证据确定性进行了评分。结果我们共纳入136项研究,其中包括2项研究。两项研究均采用tDCS应用。一项研究使用2 mA的阳极式小脑tDCS或假手术治疗25分钟,并伴有前庭康复治疗(VRT),另一项研究使用左背外侧前额叶皮质(F3)的阳极式tDCS治疗25 - 30分钟,并伴有家中VRT。两项研究均显示眩晕障碍量表(DHI)、状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)、特定活动平衡自信量表(ABC)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)得分的临床改善。两项研究均提供了GRADE量表的高质量证据和低偏倚风险。结论:基于两项研究,与VRT相关的F3或小脑淋巴结tDCS可改善慢性前庭症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on vestibulopathy disorders: a systematic review
Abstract Objectives New types of treatments have emerged, such as non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), to treat chronic vestibular dysfunction (VD). Considering that NIBS is a promising approach to reduce VD symptoms, this review was aimed to analyze the effects of NIBS in patients with VD. Methods We adhered to the methods described in the Cochrane Handbook for Intervention Reviews. The eligibility criteria were as follows: (a) individuals with vestibulopathy having clinical and neuroimaging; (b) Interventions: non-invasive brain stimulation, this intervention comprised transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); (c) Control: any comparison or sham; and (d) Outcomes: dizziness and balance. We included randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies from July 2004 to February 2020. We searched the PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, and Ovid databases. Two pairs of reviewers independently screened all titles and abstracts. Two authors assessed the risk of bias for each study using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to rate the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. Results We identified 136 studies, and included two studies. Both studies used tDCS application. One study used anodal cerebellar tDCS or sham at 2 mA for 25 min associated with vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT), and the other study used anodal tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (F3) for 25–30 min associated with VRT at home. Both studies showed clinical improvement in the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC), and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores. Both studies presented higher-quality evidence on the GRADE scale and a low risk of bias. Conclusions Based on two studies, anodal tDCS over F3 or the cerebellum associated with VRT improved chronic vestibular symptoms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hearing Balance and Communication
Hearing Balance and Communication AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊最新文献
Comparison of quick speech-in-noise test and pure tone audiometry in noise-induced hearing loss Otolin-1 as a biomarker for the evaluation of the effectiveness of betahistine treatment for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo The effect of hearing loss on balance in subjects with cognitive disorders Effect of auditory deprivation on threshold of sound lateralization Assessment of spatial acuity in typically developing children: a comparative study of sound-field and closed-field sound source identification paradigms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1