柠檬分散市场中的任意双边谈判

Bruno Barsanetti, Braz Camargo
{"title":"柠檬分散市场中的任意双边谈判","authors":"Bruno Barsanetti, Braz Camargo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3893225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate the efficiency of dynamic random matching and bilateral bargaining markets with adverse selection. We take a detail-free approach to the bargaining game, assuming only that: (a) each agent's actions are optimal given the equilibrium market conditions and the equilibrium strategy of the opposing agents; (b) bargaining reveals information about the quality of the object to the uninformed buyer, who cannot commit to acquire the object at a price that exceeds her expected reservation price conditional on such information. We characterize the equilibrium that maximizes the realized gains from trade among all decentralized equilibria. We show this equilibrium features full information revelation during bargaining. This equilibrium also realizes strictly more gains from trade than any equilibrium of trade under a price system, which we use as a benchmark for trade in centralized markets. However, as trading frictions vanish, the optimal decentralized market allocation converges to the optimal centralized market allocation.","PeriodicalId":11757,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arbitrary Bilateral Bargaining in Decentralized Markets for Lemons\",\"authors\":\"Bruno Barsanetti, Braz Camargo\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3893225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigate the efficiency of dynamic random matching and bilateral bargaining markets with adverse selection. We take a detail-free approach to the bargaining game, assuming only that: (a) each agent's actions are optimal given the equilibrium market conditions and the equilibrium strategy of the opposing agents; (b) bargaining reveals information about the quality of the object to the uninformed buyer, who cannot commit to acquire the object at a price that exceeds her expected reservation price conditional on such information. We characterize the equilibrium that maximizes the realized gains from trade among all decentralized equilibria. We show this equilibrium features full information revelation during bargaining. This equilibrium also realizes strictly more gains from trade than any equilibrium of trade under a price system, which we use as a benchmark for trade in centralized markets. However, as trading frictions vanish, the optimal decentralized market allocation converges to the optimal centralized market allocation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3893225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3893225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了具有逆向选择的动态随机匹配和双边议价市场的效率问题。我们对议价博弈采取无细节的方法,仅假设:(a)给定均衡市场条件和对立代理的均衡策略,每个代理的行为是最优的;(b)议价向不知情的买方透露了有关物品质量的信息,买方不能承诺以超出其预期保留价的价格获得该物品。我们描述了在所有分散均衡中使贸易实现收益最大化的均衡。我们证明了这种均衡在议价过程中具有充分的信息披露特征。这种均衡从贸易中获得的收益也严格高于价格体系下的任何贸易均衡,我们将价格体系作为集中市场贸易的基准。然而,当交易摩擦消失时,分散市场的最优配置收敛于集中市场的最优配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Arbitrary Bilateral Bargaining in Decentralized Markets for Lemons
We investigate the efficiency of dynamic random matching and bilateral bargaining markets with adverse selection. We take a detail-free approach to the bargaining game, assuming only that: (a) each agent's actions are optimal given the equilibrium market conditions and the equilibrium strategy of the opposing agents; (b) bargaining reveals information about the quality of the object to the uninformed buyer, who cannot commit to acquire the object at a price that exceeds her expected reservation price conditional on such information. We characterize the equilibrium that maximizes the realized gains from trade among all decentralized equilibria. We show this equilibrium features full information revelation during bargaining. This equilibrium also realizes strictly more gains from trade than any equilibrium of trade under a price system, which we use as a benchmark for trade in centralized markets. However, as trading frictions vanish, the optimal decentralized market allocation converges to the optimal centralized market allocation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Order-flow-based Leading Indicators of Short-term Liquidity Shortfalls An Equilibrium Model of Career Concerns, Investment Horizons, and Mutual Fund Value Added Information, Market Power and Welfare Stock Liquidity and Algorithmic Market Making During the COVID-19 Crisis Financial Information and Diverging Beliefs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1