测量霍奇金淋巴瘤代谢肿瘤体积的多焦点分割方法的验证

Mariana R. Camacho, E. Etchebehere, N. Tardelli, M. Delamain, Aline F.A. Vercosa, M. E. Takahashi, S. Q. Brunetto, I. Metze, C. Souza, J. Cerci, C. Ramos
{"title":"测量霍奇金淋巴瘤代谢肿瘤体积的多焦点分割方法的验证","authors":"Mariana R. Camacho, E. Etchebehere, N. Tardelli, M. Delamain, Aline F.A. Vercosa, M. E. Takahashi, S. Q. Brunetto, I. Metze, C. Souza, J. Cerci, C. Ramos","doi":"10.2967/jnmt.119.231118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantification of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) can be time-consuming. We evaluated the performance of an automatic multifocal segmentation (MFS) method of quantification in patients with different stages of Hodgkin lymphoma, using the multiple VOI (MV) method as reference. Methods: This prospective bicentric study included 50 patients with Hodgkin lymphoma who underwent staging 18F-FGD PET/CT. The examinations were centrally reviewed and processed with commercial MFS software to obtain MTV and TLG using 2 fixed relative thresholds (40% and 20% of SUVmax) for each lesion. All PET/CT scans were processed using the MV and MFS methods. Interclass correlation coefficients and Bland–Altman plots were used for statistical analysis. Repeated calculations of MTV and TLG values by 2 observers with different degrees of PET/CT imaging experience were used to ascertain interobserver agreement on the MFS method. Results: The means and SDs obtained for the MTV with MV and MFS were, respectively, 736 ± 856 mL and 660 ± 699 mL for the 20% threshold and 313 ± 359 mL and 372 ± 434 mL for the 40% threshold. The time spent calculating the MTV was much shorter with the MFS method than with the MV method (median time, 11.6 min [range, 1–30 min] and 64.4 min [range, 1–240 min], respectively), especially in patients with advanced disease. Time spent was similar in patients with localized disease. There were no statistical differences between the MFS values obtained by the 2 different observers. Conclusion: MTV and TLG calculations using MFS are reproducible, generate similar results to those obtained with MV, and are much less timing-consuming. Main differences between the 2 methods were related to difficulties in avoiding overlay of VOIs in the MV technique. MV and MFS perform equally well in patients with a small number of lesions.","PeriodicalId":22799,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology","volume":"10 1","pages":"30 - 35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a Multifocal Segmentation Method for Measuring Metabolic Tumor Volume in Hodgkin Lymphoma\",\"authors\":\"Mariana R. Camacho, E. Etchebehere, N. Tardelli, M. Delamain, Aline F.A. Vercosa, M. E. Takahashi, S. Q. Brunetto, I. Metze, C. Souza, J. Cerci, C. Ramos\",\"doi\":\"10.2967/jnmt.119.231118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Quantification of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) can be time-consuming. We evaluated the performance of an automatic multifocal segmentation (MFS) method of quantification in patients with different stages of Hodgkin lymphoma, using the multiple VOI (MV) method as reference. Methods: This prospective bicentric study included 50 patients with Hodgkin lymphoma who underwent staging 18F-FGD PET/CT. The examinations were centrally reviewed and processed with commercial MFS software to obtain MTV and TLG using 2 fixed relative thresholds (40% and 20% of SUVmax) for each lesion. All PET/CT scans were processed using the MV and MFS methods. Interclass correlation coefficients and Bland–Altman plots were used for statistical analysis. Repeated calculations of MTV and TLG values by 2 observers with different degrees of PET/CT imaging experience were used to ascertain interobserver agreement on the MFS method. Results: The means and SDs obtained for the MTV with MV and MFS were, respectively, 736 ± 856 mL and 660 ± 699 mL for the 20% threshold and 313 ± 359 mL and 372 ± 434 mL for the 40% threshold. The time spent calculating the MTV was much shorter with the MFS method than with the MV method (median time, 11.6 min [range, 1–30 min] and 64.4 min [range, 1–240 min], respectively), especially in patients with advanced disease. Time spent was similar in patients with localized disease. There were no statistical differences between the MFS values obtained by the 2 different observers. Conclusion: MTV and TLG calculations using MFS are reproducible, generate similar results to those obtained with MV, and are much less timing-consuming. Main differences between the 2 methods were related to difficulties in avoiding overlay of VOIs in the MV technique. MV and MFS perform equally well in patients with a small number of lesions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"30 - 35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.119.231118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.119.231118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

代谢肿瘤体积(MTV)和病变总糖酵解(TLG)的定量可能是耗时的。我们评估了自动多焦点分割(MFS)定量方法在不同阶段霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中的表现,以多重VOI (MV)方法为参考。方法:这项前瞻性双中心研究纳入了50例霍奇金淋巴瘤患者,他们接受了分期18F-FGD PET/CT。使用商业MFS软件对检查结果进行集中回顾和处理,获得每个病变的MTV和TLG,使用2个固定的相对阈值(SUVmax的40%和20%)。所有PET/CT扫描均采用MV和MFS方法处理。采用类间相关系数和Bland-Altman图进行统计分析。2名具有不同程度PET/CT成像经验的观察者重复计算MTV和TLG值,以确定观察者之间对MFS方法的一致性。结果:MV和MFS的MTV在20%阈值下的均值和SDs分别为736±856 mL和660±699 mL,在40%阈值下的均值和SDs分别为313±359 mL和372±434 mL。MFS法计算MTV的时间远短于MV法(中位时间分别为11.6 min[范围,1-30 min]和64.4 min[范围,1-240 min]),特别是在疾病晚期患者中。在局限性疾病患者中花费的时间相似。2个不同观测者获得的MFS值无统计学差异。结论:使用MFS计算MTV和TLG具有可重复性,结果与使用MV计算结果相似,且耗时更少。两种方法的主要区别在于MV技术难以避免voi的叠加。MV和MFS在少量病变的患者中表现同样良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of a Multifocal Segmentation Method for Measuring Metabolic Tumor Volume in Hodgkin Lymphoma
Quantification of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) can be time-consuming. We evaluated the performance of an automatic multifocal segmentation (MFS) method of quantification in patients with different stages of Hodgkin lymphoma, using the multiple VOI (MV) method as reference. Methods: This prospective bicentric study included 50 patients with Hodgkin lymphoma who underwent staging 18F-FGD PET/CT. The examinations were centrally reviewed and processed with commercial MFS software to obtain MTV and TLG using 2 fixed relative thresholds (40% and 20% of SUVmax) for each lesion. All PET/CT scans were processed using the MV and MFS methods. Interclass correlation coefficients and Bland–Altman plots were used for statistical analysis. Repeated calculations of MTV and TLG values by 2 observers with different degrees of PET/CT imaging experience were used to ascertain interobserver agreement on the MFS method. Results: The means and SDs obtained for the MTV with MV and MFS were, respectively, 736 ± 856 mL and 660 ± 699 mL for the 20% threshold and 313 ± 359 mL and 372 ± 434 mL for the 40% threshold. The time spent calculating the MTV was much shorter with the MFS method than with the MV method (median time, 11.6 min [range, 1–30 min] and 64.4 min [range, 1–240 min], respectively), especially in patients with advanced disease. Time spent was similar in patients with localized disease. There were no statistical differences between the MFS values obtained by the 2 different observers. Conclusion: MTV and TLG calculations using MFS are reproducible, generate similar results to those obtained with MV, and are much less timing-consuming. Main differences between the 2 methods were related to difficulties in avoiding overlay of VOIs in the MV technique. MV and MFS perform equally well in patients with a small number of lesions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diuretic Renal Scintigraphy Stability Matters: Radiochemical Stability of Therapeutic Radiopharmaceutical 177Lu-PSMA I&T Small-Bowel and Colon Transit SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Molecular Breast Imaging with Dedicated γ-Cameras SNMMI Clinical Trials Network Research Series for Technologists: Clinical Research Primer—Regulatory Process, Part II: The Role of the Institutional Review Board in Food and Drug Administration–Regulated Radiopharmaceutical Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1