欧洲空间治理-迈向空间规划的部门化

F. Sielker
{"title":"欧洲空间治理-迈向空间规划的部门化","authors":"F. Sielker","doi":"10.1108/JPPEL-03-2018-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nEuropean spatial governance underwent substantial changes over the past two decades with the expansion of European territorial cooperation programmes, the introduction of new instruments for cooperation and an increasing role of financial and regulatory framework in sector policies. Against this background the paper develops the argument that today’s European spatial governance has become more diversified and fragmented, leading to an increasing role for sector policies, and that the cumulative effect of these diverse activities on domestic planning processes are under researched. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nThis paper summarises the legal recognition of spatial planning and categorises European spatial governance as being composed of spatial policies, financial instruments and governance frameworks. This paper then presents three explorative case studies: the Common Transport policy as one European Union (EU) sector policy, a cross-border cooperation supported by the European Regional Development Fund and macro-regional cooperation. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nThis paper concludes that the increasing regulatory impact of European spatial governance on domestic spatial planning goes far beyond the pure Europeanisation of narratives and agendas or “ways of doing things”. Furthermore, this paper illustrates that European spatial governance is characterised by a process of sectoralisation, supported by the EU’s regional policy and the provision of governance tools. The paper calls for further investigation of the interrelatedness of these processes and their reciprocal influences on planning practices. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nThe value lies in recognising the incremental changes that have come alongside European integration, and highlighting the importance of these processes for domestic planning processes. This paper highlights the hidden process of sectoralisation that leads to an increase in planning competences at the European level.","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European spatial governance – towards a sectoralisation of spatial planning\",\"authors\":\"F. Sielker\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/JPPEL-03-2018-0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nEuropean spatial governance underwent substantial changes over the past two decades with the expansion of European territorial cooperation programmes, the introduction of new instruments for cooperation and an increasing role of financial and regulatory framework in sector policies. Against this background the paper develops the argument that today’s European spatial governance has become more diversified and fragmented, leading to an increasing role for sector policies, and that the cumulative effect of these diverse activities on domestic planning processes are under researched. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nDesign/methodology/approach \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThis paper summarises the legal recognition of spatial planning and categorises European spatial governance as being composed of spatial policies, financial instruments and governance frameworks. This paper then presents three explorative case studies: the Common Transport policy as one European Union (EU) sector policy, a cross-border cooperation supported by the European Regional Development Fund and macro-regional cooperation. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nFindings \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThis paper concludes that the increasing regulatory impact of European spatial governance on domestic spatial planning goes far beyond the pure Europeanisation of narratives and agendas or “ways of doing things”. Furthermore, this paper illustrates that European spatial governance is characterised by a process of sectoralisation, supported by the EU’s regional policy and the provision of governance tools. The paper calls for further investigation of the interrelatedness of these processes and their reciprocal influences on planning practices. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nOriginality/value \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe value lies in recognising the incremental changes that have come alongside European integration, and highlighting the importance of these processes for domestic planning processes. This paper highlights the hidden process of sectoralisation that leads to an increase in planning competences at the European level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/JPPEL-03-2018-0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JPPEL-03-2018-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在过去二十年中,随着欧洲领土合作方案的扩大、新的合作手段的采用以及金融和监管框架在部门政策中的作用日益增强,欧洲空间治理发生了重大变化。在此背景下,本文提出了以下论点:当今欧洲的空间治理已经变得更加多样化和碎片化,导致部门政策的作用越来越大,并且正在研究这些多样化活动对国内规划过程的累积效应。本文总结了空间规划的法律认可,并将欧洲空间治理分为空间政策、金融工具和治理框架。然后,本文提出了三个探索性案例研究:作为一个欧盟部门政策的共同运输政策、欧洲区域发展基金支持的跨境合作和宏观区域合作。本文的结论是,欧洲空间治理对国内空间规划日益增长的监管影响远远超出了叙事和议程或“做事方式”的纯粹欧洲化。此外,本文还说明了欧洲空间治理的特点是一个由欧盟区域政策和治理工具提供支持的部门化过程。本文呼吁进一步调查这些过程的相互关系及其对规划实践的相互影响。价值在于认识到随着欧洲一体化而来的渐进式变化,并强调这些过程对国内规划过程的重要性。本文强调了导致欧洲层面规划能力提高的部门化的隐藏过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
European spatial governance – towards a sectoralisation of spatial planning
Purpose European spatial governance underwent substantial changes over the past two decades with the expansion of European territorial cooperation programmes, the introduction of new instruments for cooperation and an increasing role of financial and regulatory framework in sector policies. Against this background the paper develops the argument that today’s European spatial governance has become more diversified and fragmented, leading to an increasing role for sector policies, and that the cumulative effect of these diverse activities on domestic planning processes are under researched. Design/methodology/approach This paper summarises the legal recognition of spatial planning and categorises European spatial governance as being composed of spatial policies, financial instruments and governance frameworks. This paper then presents three explorative case studies: the Common Transport policy as one European Union (EU) sector policy, a cross-border cooperation supported by the European Regional Development Fund and macro-regional cooperation. Findings This paper concludes that the increasing regulatory impact of European spatial governance on domestic spatial planning goes far beyond the pure Europeanisation of narratives and agendas or “ways of doing things”. Furthermore, this paper illustrates that European spatial governance is characterised by a process of sectoralisation, supported by the EU’s regional policy and the provision of governance tools. The paper calls for further investigation of the interrelatedness of these processes and their reciprocal influences on planning practices. Originality/value The value lies in recognising the incremental changes that have come alongside European integration, and highlighting the importance of these processes for domestic planning processes. This paper highlights the hidden process of sectoralisation that leads to an increase in planning competences at the European level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
The absurdity of the modern law of town and village greens Legal framework of sustainable construction procurement to prevent land degradation: comparison between Indonesia, Singapore and Thailand Can community land trust models work in Peru? Researching community-based land tenure models for affordable housing “From the lease’s point of view”: the role of tied leases in shaping the UK pub sector Redeveloping the compact city: the challenges of strata collective sales
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1