企业家精神的知识溢出理论:智利悖论

IF 3.3 1区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS Entrepreneurship and Regional Development Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1080/08985626.2022.2117418
Daniel Mahn, C. Poblete
{"title":"企业家精神的知识溢出理论:智利悖论","authors":"Daniel Mahn, C. Poblete","doi":"10.1080/08985626.2022.2117418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This research uses hierarchical linear modelling to test the KSTE in a developing-country context. By trying this theory on a different setting as is usually studied, we attempt to identify boundary conditions, expanding this theory’s understanding. Results show the low effectiveness of this theory in a developing economy, suggesting that additional dimensions are needed to understand it completely. In reviewing the high-tech sector (the only sector in which we found evidence that the KSTE mechanisms apply), our data shows the importance of diversity for technological innovation and thus for firms born out of spillovers. Finally, we find that easiness to start a business interacts with human capital into forming high-tech new firms. Under a more bureaucratic system, high-knowledge human capital will have fewer incentives to switch from employment to self-employment and start a venture. By dealing with the specificities of developing economies when dealing with the KSTE, policymakers can avoid applying police recipes coming from findings related only to developed economies that cannot fit with the characteristics of these countries. In this context, this phenomenon is not particularly relevant for fostering new ventures, joining on the call of avoiding standardized strategies to build efficient entrepreneurial ecosystems.","PeriodicalId":54210,"journal":{"name":"Entrepreneurship and Regional Development","volume":"87 1","pages":"209 - 239"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contextualizing the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship: the Chilean paradox\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Mahn, C. Poblete\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08985626.2022.2117418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This research uses hierarchical linear modelling to test the KSTE in a developing-country context. By trying this theory on a different setting as is usually studied, we attempt to identify boundary conditions, expanding this theory’s understanding. Results show the low effectiveness of this theory in a developing economy, suggesting that additional dimensions are needed to understand it completely. In reviewing the high-tech sector (the only sector in which we found evidence that the KSTE mechanisms apply), our data shows the importance of diversity for technological innovation and thus for firms born out of spillovers. Finally, we find that easiness to start a business interacts with human capital into forming high-tech new firms. Under a more bureaucratic system, high-knowledge human capital will have fewer incentives to switch from employment to self-employment and start a venture. By dealing with the specificities of developing economies when dealing with the KSTE, policymakers can avoid applying police recipes coming from findings related only to developed economies that cannot fit with the characteristics of these countries. In this context, this phenomenon is not particularly relevant for fostering new ventures, joining on the call of avoiding standardized strategies to build efficient entrepreneurial ecosystems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Entrepreneurship and Regional Development\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"209 - 239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Entrepreneurship and Regional Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2022.2117418\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entrepreneurship and Regional Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2022.2117418","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究使用层次线性模型来测试发展中国家背景下的KSTE。通过在通常研究的不同环境中尝试这一理论,我们试图确定边界条件,扩展这一理论的理解。结果表明,这一理论在发展中经济体中的有效性很低,这表明需要额外的维度来完全理解它。在回顾高科技部门(我们发现证据表明KSTE机制适用的唯一部门)时,我们的数据显示了多样性对技术创新的重要性,因此对因溢出效应而诞生的公司也是如此。最后,我们发现创业难易度与人力资本相互作用,形成高科技新公司。在一个更加官僚化的体制下,高知识的人力资本将没有多少动力从就业转向自主创业和创业。在处理KSTE问题时,通过处理发展中经济体的特殊性,政策制定者可以避免使用来自仅与发达经济体相关的发现的警察配方,这些发现不适合这些国家的特点。在这种情况下,这种现象与培育新的企业并没有特别的关系,而是在呼吁避免标准化战略以建立有效的企业生态系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contextualizing the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship: the Chilean paradox
ABSTRACT This research uses hierarchical linear modelling to test the KSTE in a developing-country context. By trying this theory on a different setting as is usually studied, we attempt to identify boundary conditions, expanding this theory’s understanding. Results show the low effectiveness of this theory in a developing economy, suggesting that additional dimensions are needed to understand it completely. In reviewing the high-tech sector (the only sector in which we found evidence that the KSTE mechanisms apply), our data shows the importance of diversity for technological innovation and thus for firms born out of spillovers. Finally, we find that easiness to start a business interacts with human capital into forming high-tech new firms. Under a more bureaucratic system, high-knowledge human capital will have fewer incentives to switch from employment to self-employment and start a venture. By dealing with the specificities of developing economies when dealing with the KSTE, policymakers can avoid applying police recipes coming from findings related only to developed economies that cannot fit with the characteristics of these countries. In this context, this phenomenon is not particularly relevant for fostering new ventures, joining on the call of avoiding standardized strategies to build efficient entrepreneurial ecosystems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Entrepreneurship and Regional Development is unique in that it addresses the central factors in economic development - entrepreneurial vitality and innovation - as local and regional phenomena. It provides a multi-disciplinary forum for researchers and practitioners in the field of entrepreneurship and small firm development and for those studying and developing the local and regional context in which entrepreneurs emerge, innovate and establish the new economic activities which drive economic growth and create new economic wealth and employment. The Journal focuses on the diverse and complex characteristics of local and regional economies which lead to entrepreneurial vitality and endow the large and small firms within them with international competitiveness.
期刊最新文献
Back to work? How employers perceive applicants’ experience of entrepreneurial failure Exploring the impact of regional characteristics on social incubators’ mission, structure and activity: a contingency perspective Resilience and digitally-advanced entrepreneurship An Entrepreneurship-as-practice perspective of next-generation becoming family businesses successors: the role of discursive artefacts How small firms build resilience to ward off crises: a paradox perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1