平衡计分卡与成本效益模型在社会项目评价中的应用

I. Solntsev
{"title":"平衡计分卡与成本效益模型在社会项目评价中的应用","authors":"I. Solntsev","doi":"10.26794/2304-022x-2023-13-1-83-94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social initiatives are not always considered in the context of efficiency the solution of certain tasks often prevails, without taking into account the necessary investments or generated results. In the current crisis, when access to financial resources is extremely limited, the issue of efficiency is of particular relevance both for the state and for private investors implementing social projects. One of the most common methods for their evaluation is the balanced scorecard and the cost-benefit model. The purpose of this work is to study the features of the practical application of these tools for evaluating the effectiveness of social projects, the rationale for specific metrics, approaches to their integration into a single system, as well as consideration of some features of the calculations, for example, the justification of the social discount rate. The work used such scientific methods as analysis, comparison, generalization and modeling. The author adapts the balanced scorecard for the evaluation of social projects, explains its structure and offers a typical model that can be used regardless the field of application (health, education, sports, etc.). Today the presence of a fair evaluation system will become an important competitive advantage that makes this study interesting for government agencies at the federal and regional levels, government corporations and businesses, as well as charitable foundations.","PeriodicalId":35958,"journal":{"name":"Periodica Polytechnica, Social and Management Sciences","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of the balanced scorecard and the cost-benefit model for evaluate of social projects\",\"authors\":\"I. Solntsev\",\"doi\":\"10.26794/2304-022x-2023-13-1-83-94\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social initiatives are not always considered in the context of efficiency the solution of certain tasks often prevails, without taking into account the necessary investments or generated results. In the current crisis, when access to financial resources is extremely limited, the issue of efficiency is of particular relevance both for the state and for private investors implementing social projects. One of the most common methods for their evaluation is the balanced scorecard and the cost-benefit model. The purpose of this work is to study the features of the practical application of these tools for evaluating the effectiveness of social projects, the rationale for specific metrics, approaches to their integration into a single system, as well as consideration of some features of the calculations, for example, the justification of the social discount rate. The work used such scientific methods as analysis, comparison, generalization and modeling. The author adapts the balanced scorecard for the evaluation of social projects, explains its structure and offers a typical model that can be used regardless the field of application (health, education, sports, etc.). Today the presence of a fair evaluation system will become an important competitive advantage that makes this study interesting for government agencies at the federal and regional levels, government corporations and businesses, as well as charitable foundations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Periodica Polytechnica, Social and Management Sciences\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Periodica Polytechnica, Social and Management Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022x-2023-13-1-83-94\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periodica Polytechnica, Social and Management Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022x-2023-13-1-83-94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会倡议并不总是从效率的角度来考虑,某些任务的解决办法往往占上风,而没有考虑到必要的投资或产生的结果。在当前的危机中,当获得财政资源的途径极其有限时,效率问题对实施社会项目的国家和私人投资者都具有特别重要的意义。最常用的评估方法之一是平衡计分卡和成本效益模型。这项工作的目的是研究这些工具在评估社会项目有效性方面的实际应用的特点,具体指标的基本原理,将它们整合到单一系统中的方法,以及考虑计算的一些特点,例如,社会贴现率的合理性。本文运用了分析、比较、概括、建模等科学方法。作者将平衡计分卡应用于社会项目的评价,对平衡计分卡的结构进行了解释,并提出了一种适用于任何应用领域(卫生、教育、体育等)的典型模型。今天,公平评估体系的存在将成为一项重要的竞争优势,这使得这项研究对联邦和地区各级政府机构、政府公司和企业以及慈善基金会都很有趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of the balanced scorecard and the cost-benefit model for evaluate of social projects
Social initiatives are not always considered in the context of efficiency the solution of certain tasks often prevails, without taking into account the necessary investments or generated results. In the current crisis, when access to financial resources is extremely limited, the issue of efficiency is of particular relevance both for the state and for private investors implementing social projects. One of the most common methods for their evaluation is the balanced scorecard and the cost-benefit model. The purpose of this work is to study the features of the practical application of these tools for evaluating the effectiveness of social projects, the rationale for specific metrics, approaches to their integration into a single system, as well as consideration of some features of the calculations, for example, the justification of the social discount rate. The work used such scientific methods as analysis, comparison, generalization and modeling. The author adapts the balanced scorecard for the evaluation of social projects, explains its structure and offers a typical model that can be used regardless the field of application (health, education, sports, etc.). Today the presence of a fair evaluation system will become an important competitive advantage that makes this study interesting for government agencies at the federal and regional levels, government corporations and businesses, as well as charitable foundations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Periodica Polytechnica, Social and Management Sciences
Periodica Polytechnica, Social and Management Sciences Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Learning on Assembly Line Balancing: A Review Green Fashion Consumption – a Review of the Literature The Economic Measurement of Cyber Incidents Understanding Green Food Consumption Behavior Ecological Footprint Calculation as a Land Demand: Based on the Dynamic Leontief Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1