治疗慢性疼痛和痉挛的椎管内给药途径

Leonardo Kapural MD, PhD , Alexandra Szabova MD , Nagy A Mekhail MD, PhD
{"title":"治疗慢性疼痛和痉挛的椎管内给药途径","authors":"Leonardo Kapural MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Alexandra Szabova MD ,&nbsp;Nagy A Mekhail MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.spmd.2004.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Subarachnoidal and epidural are the two most frequent routes for intraspinal drug delivery in treatment of chronic pain and spasticity. In addition, there are less frequently used intraventricular and subdural routes. In this review, basic concepts of intraspinal drug delivery using different intraspinal routes are discussed. The intrathecal administration of drugs is preferred today, mainly because of effective dosing in low volumes using portable infusion systems. Intrathecal catheters are longer lasting and have lower rates of complications than epidural; there are fewer side effects and development of tolerance in patients with chronic pain is reduced when the intrathecal route is used. Today, for long-term pain management in patients with benign chronic pain and in those cancer patients with longer life expectancy, the intrathecal route is preferred.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101158,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Pain Medicine","volume":"1 4","pages":"Pages 254-259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.spmd.2004.01.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraspinal drug delivery routes for treatment of chronic pain and spasticity\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo Kapural MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Alexandra Szabova MD ,&nbsp;Nagy A Mekhail MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spmd.2004.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Subarachnoidal and epidural are the two most frequent routes for intraspinal drug delivery in treatment of chronic pain and spasticity. In addition, there are less frequently used intraventricular and subdural routes. In this review, basic concepts of intraspinal drug delivery using different intraspinal routes are discussed. The intrathecal administration of drugs is preferred today, mainly because of effective dosing in low volumes using portable infusion systems. Intrathecal catheters are longer lasting and have lower rates of complications than epidural; there are fewer side effects and development of tolerance in patients with chronic pain is reduced when the intrathecal route is used. Today, for long-term pain management in patients with benign chronic pain and in those cancer patients with longer life expectancy, the intrathecal route is preferred.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 254-259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.spmd.2004.01.001\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1537589704000023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1537589704000023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

蛛网膜下腔和硬膜外腔是治疗慢性疼痛和痉挛的两种最常见的椎管内给药途径。此外,还有较少使用的脑室内和硬膜下路径。在这篇综述中,讨论了使用不同的椎管内途径的椎管内给药的基本概念。目前首选鞘内给药,主要是因为使用便携式输注系统可以在小剂量下有效给药。鞘内置管比硬膜外置管更持久,并发症发生率更低;当使用鞘内途径时,慢性疼痛患者的副作用更少,耐受性的发展也会减少。今天,对于良性慢性疼痛患者和那些预期寿命较长的癌症患者的长期疼痛管理,鞘内途径是首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intraspinal drug delivery routes for treatment of chronic pain and spasticity

Subarachnoidal and epidural are the two most frequent routes for intraspinal drug delivery in treatment of chronic pain and spasticity. In addition, there are less frequently used intraventricular and subdural routes. In this review, basic concepts of intraspinal drug delivery using different intraspinal routes are discussed. The intrathecal administration of drugs is preferred today, mainly because of effective dosing in low volumes using portable infusion systems. Intrathecal catheters are longer lasting and have lower rates of complications than epidural; there are fewer side effects and development of tolerance in patients with chronic pain is reduced when the intrathecal route is used. Today, for long-term pain management in patients with benign chronic pain and in those cancer patients with longer life expectancy, the intrathecal route is preferred.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preface Table of contents Editorial board Clinical relevance and ethical aspects of placebos Opioid and placebo analgesia share the same network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1