Rod-ring悖论

Oyvind Gron, Eirik Berntsen
{"title":"Rod-ring悖论","authors":"Oyvind Gron, Eirik Berntsen","doi":"10.13189/ujpa.2022.160401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new apparent relativistic paradox is presented involving only one space-time event. This is different from earlier relativistic paradoxes involving extended bodies or events at different positions. A collision between a rod and a ring impacting at an oblique angle to each other is considered in the context of the special theory relativity. A question arises as to where along the length of the rod the point of impact will be according to two observers following the rod and the ring, respectively. The observers argue from a purely kinematical point of view in favor of two different points of impact along the rod. However there can only exist one point of impact. In order to solve this apparent paradox we use the asynchronous formulation of relativistic kinematics in which the consequences of the relativity of simultaneity are built into the formalism. We show that this reconciles the descriptions from the two frames of reference, and hence that the new paradox leads to a strong argument for the relevance of the asynchronous formulation of relativistic kinematics.","PeriodicalId":23443,"journal":{"name":"Universal Journal of Physics and Application","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rod-ring Paradox\",\"authors\":\"Oyvind Gron, Eirik Berntsen\",\"doi\":\"10.13189/ujpa.2022.160401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A new apparent relativistic paradox is presented involving only one space-time event. This is different from earlier relativistic paradoxes involving extended bodies or events at different positions. A collision between a rod and a ring impacting at an oblique angle to each other is considered in the context of the special theory relativity. A question arises as to where along the length of the rod the point of impact will be according to two observers following the rod and the ring, respectively. The observers argue from a purely kinematical point of view in favor of two different points of impact along the rod. However there can only exist one point of impact. In order to solve this apparent paradox we use the asynchronous formulation of relativistic kinematics in which the consequences of the relativity of simultaneity are built into the formalism. We show that this reconciles the descriptions from the two frames of reference, and hence that the new paradox leads to a strong argument for the relevance of the asynchronous formulation of relativistic kinematics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Universal Journal of Physics and Application\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Universal Journal of Physics and Application\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13189/ujpa.2022.160401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universal Journal of Physics and Application","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13189/ujpa.2022.160401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提出了一个新的视相对论悖论,它只涉及一个时空事件。这不同于早期涉及不同位置的扩展物体或事件的相对论悖论。在狭义相对论的背景下,考虑了以斜角相互碰撞的杆和环之间的碰撞。一个问题是,根据两个分别跟踪杆和环的观察者,沿杆的长度,撞击点将在哪里。观察者从纯粹运动学的观点出发,主张沿杆有两个不同的撞击点。但是,只能存在一个冲击点。为了解决这个明显的悖论,我们使用相对论运动学的异步公式,其中同时性相对论的结果被构建到形式主义中。我们表明,这调和了两个参照系的描述,因此,新的悖论导致了对相对论运动学异步公式相关性的有力论证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rod-ring Paradox
A new apparent relativistic paradox is presented involving only one space-time event. This is different from earlier relativistic paradoxes involving extended bodies or events at different positions. A collision between a rod and a ring impacting at an oblique angle to each other is considered in the context of the special theory relativity. A question arises as to where along the length of the rod the point of impact will be according to two observers following the rod and the ring, respectively. The observers argue from a purely kinematical point of view in favor of two different points of impact along the rod. However there can only exist one point of impact. In order to solve this apparent paradox we use the asynchronous formulation of relativistic kinematics in which the consequences of the relativity of simultaneity are built into the formalism. We show that this reconciles the descriptions from the two frames of reference, and hence that the new paradox leads to a strong argument for the relevance of the asynchronous formulation of relativistic kinematics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Disk of Concave Mirrors: An Experiment of the Light with Contradictory Formulas The NOW of time and the Pioneer Anomaly Tachyons, the Four-Momentum Formalism and Simultaneity Killing Vector Fields and Conserved Currents on Rotationally Symmetric Space-time Discovery of Ambiguity in the Traditional Norms of Specifying Physical Quantities along the Axes of Coordinates in Drawing Data Based Graphs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1