CBCT, x线摄影和四种电子顶点定位器在工作长度确定中的准确性比较

IF 0.3 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Makara Journal of Health Research Pub Date : 2022-04-26 DOI:10.7454/msk.v26i1.1334
Merve Yeniçeri Özata, Seda Falakaloğlu, Sadullah Kaya, Merve Yeniçeri, Özata
{"title":"CBCT, x线摄影和四种电子顶点定位器在工作长度确定中的准确性比较","authors":"Merve Yeniçeri Özata, Seda Falakaloğlu, Sadullah Kaya, Merve Yeniçeri, Özata","doi":"10.7454/msk.v26i1.1334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : One of the significant stages during endodontic procedures is determining the correct working length (WL). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of four electronic apex locators (EALs) (Root ZX mini, Raypex 6, Propex Pixi, and E-Pex Pro) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and radiographic measurement in determining the actual WL (A-WL). Methods : Thirty extracted single-root mandibular premolars were selected and flattened at the crown. The WL was determined by advancing the #15 K file until its tip was visible from the apical, and the A-WL was established by subtracting 0.5 mm from this length. The WL was also determined using periapical radiography, four EALs, and CBCT. The differences in all measurements were compared with the A-WL. The data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (Welch) and Tamhane’s test. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. Results : Compared with other measurement methods, CBCT gave shorter values than the A-WL, and this finding was statistically significant compared with those of the PR and Propex Pixi groups ( p = 0.009) ( p = 0.024). No significant difference was observed between the other groups ( p > 0.05) except the CBCT group ( p < 0.05). Conclusions : Root ZX mini and Raypex 6 made measurements close to the A-WL.","PeriodicalId":51994,"journal":{"name":"Makara Journal of Health Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Accuracies of CBCT, Radiography, and Four Electronic Apex Locators in Working Length Determination\",\"authors\":\"Merve Yeniçeri Özata, Seda Falakaloğlu, Sadullah Kaya, Merve Yeniçeri, Özata\",\"doi\":\"10.7454/msk.v26i1.1334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background : One of the significant stages during endodontic procedures is determining the correct working length (WL). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of four electronic apex locators (EALs) (Root ZX mini, Raypex 6, Propex Pixi, and E-Pex Pro) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and radiographic measurement in determining the actual WL (A-WL). Methods : Thirty extracted single-root mandibular premolars were selected and flattened at the crown. The WL was determined by advancing the #15 K file until its tip was visible from the apical, and the A-WL was established by subtracting 0.5 mm from this length. The WL was also determined using periapical radiography, four EALs, and CBCT. The differences in all measurements were compared with the A-WL. The data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (Welch) and Tamhane’s test. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. Results : Compared with other measurement methods, CBCT gave shorter values than the A-WL, and this finding was statistically significant compared with those of the PR and Propex Pixi groups ( p = 0.009) ( p = 0.024). No significant difference was observed between the other groups ( p > 0.05) except the CBCT group ( p < 0.05). Conclusions : Root ZX mini and Raypex 6 made measurements close to the A-WL.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Makara Journal of Health Research\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Makara Journal of Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7454/msk.v26i1.1334\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Makara Journal of Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7454/msk.v26i1.1334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:牙髓治疗过程中一个重要的阶段是确定正确的工作长度(WL)。本研究旨在评估四种电子顶点定位仪(EALs) (Root ZX mini, Raypex 6, Propex Pixi和E-Pex Pro)和锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和放射测量在确定实际WL (A-WL)方面的准确性。方法:选择30颗拔除的单根前磨牙,在牙冠处压平。通过推进#15 K文件,直到其尖端从根尖可见,确定WL,并通过从该长度减去0.5 mm来确定A-WL。WL也通过根尖周围x线摄影、四个EALs和CBCT来确定。将所有测量值的差异与A-WL进行比较。采用单向方差分析(Welch)和Tamhane检验对数据进行统计学分析。显著性水平为p < 0.05。结果:与其他测量方法相比,CBCT的测量值短于A-WL,与PR组和Propex Pixi组比较,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.009) (p = 0.024)。除CBCT组差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)外,其他组间差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。结论:Root ZX mini和Raypex 6测量接近A-WL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the Accuracies of CBCT, Radiography, and Four Electronic Apex Locators in Working Length Determination
Background : One of the significant stages during endodontic procedures is determining the correct working length (WL). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of four electronic apex locators (EALs) (Root ZX mini, Raypex 6, Propex Pixi, and E-Pex Pro) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and radiographic measurement in determining the actual WL (A-WL). Methods : Thirty extracted single-root mandibular premolars were selected and flattened at the crown. The WL was determined by advancing the #15 K file until its tip was visible from the apical, and the A-WL was established by subtracting 0.5 mm from this length. The WL was also determined using periapical radiography, four EALs, and CBCT. The differences in all measurements were compared with the A-WL. The data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (Welch) and Tamhane’s test. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. Results : Compared with other measurement methods, CBCT gave shorter values than the A-WL, and this finding was statistically significant compared with those of the PR and Propex Pixi groups ( p = 0.009) ( p = 0.024). No significant difference was observed between the other groups ( p > 0.05) except the CBCT group ( p < 0.05). Conclusions : Root ZX mini and Raypex 6 made measurements close to the A-WL.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Makara Journal of Health Research
Makara Journal of Health Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Risk Factors Associated with Occupational Stress among Malaysian Construction Professionals Association between rs2787094 Genetic Variants in ADAM33 Gene and Asthma in Indonesian Population: Preliminary study Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the Academic Nurse Self-Efficacy Scale Prediction of Factors for Patients with Hypertension and Dyslipidemia Using Multilayer Feedforward Neural Networks and Ordered Logistic Regression Analysis: A Robust Hybrid Methodology Relationship Between Plasma Fluoride Levels, Glutathione Peroxidase Activity, Hemoglobin, and Abortion in Rural and Urban Pregnant Women from Settat (Morocco)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1