克罗恩病与结肠憩室炎引流腹内脓肿微生物谱比较

R. Al-Rubaie, Hayder Alqaisi, A. El‐Hussuna
{"title":"克罗恩病与结肠憩室炎引流腹内脓肿微生物谱比较","authors":"R. Al-Rubaie, Hayder Alqaisi, A. El‐Hussuna","doi":"10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2022.2022-9-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To investigate the microbiological profile of intra-abdominal abscesses drained from patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) compared to patients with complicated diverticulitis coli (cDC). Method: This was a retrospective, cohort, pilot study. Inclusion criteria were adult patients who underwent percutaneous ultrasonographic/computed tomography (CT) guided drainage or aspiration of abscess. Cultures were performed for all patients and tested with Gram staining. Demographic data, pre-operative medications taken for CD, abscess size, antibiotic coverage after drainage, abscess recurrence, surgical resection, resection type and post-operative complications were investigated. Results: A total 44 patients with CD (n=18) and cDC (n=26) were investigated in this pilot study. Cultures showed mostly mixed Gram-positive and negative bacteria in both CD and cDC, but Gram-negative culture was more prevalent in cDC (p=0.029). The most common bacteria was Escherichia coli in both groups. Anaerobic bacteria were the second most common flora in patients with cDC, while Streptococcus , Enterococcus , Extended spectrum Beta Lactamase-producing organisms, Pseudomonas , Morganella and Proteus were the second most common in patients with CD. Conclusion: Mixed Gram-positive and negative bacteria with Escherichia coli were the most common bacteria in CD and cDC. Both groups also showed significant growth of Enterococci , Streptococci , and anaerobic bacteria in culture. Klebsiella pneumoniae was significantly more prevalent in patients with CD.","PeriodicalId":23376,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Microbiological Profile of Drained Intra-Abdominal Abscess in Patients with Crohn’s Disease and Colonic Diverticulitis\",\"authors\":\"R. Al-Rubaie, Hayder Alqaisi, A. El‐Hussuna\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2022.2022-9-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To investigate the microbiological profile of intra-abdominal abscesses drained from patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) compared to patients with complicated diverticulitis coli (cDC). Method: This was a retrospective, cohort, pilot study. Inclusion criteria were adult patients who underwent percutaneous ultrasonographic/computed tomography (CT) guided drainage or aspiration of abscess. Cultures were performed for all patients and tested with Gram staining. Demographic data, pre-operative medications taken for CD, abscess size, antibiotic coverage after drainage, abscess recurrence, surgical resection, resection type and post-operative complications were investigated. Results: A total 44 patients with CD (n=18) and cDC (n=26) were investigated in this pilot study. Cultures showed mostly mixed Gram-positive and negative bacteria in both CD and cDC, but Gram-negative culture was more prevalent in cDC (p=0.029). The most common bacteria was Escherichia coli in both groups. Anaerobic bacteria were the second most common flora in patients with cDC, while Streptococcus , Enterococcus , Extended spectrum Beta Lactamase-producing organisms, Pseudomonas , Morganella and Proteus were the second most common in patients with CD. Conclusion: Mixed Gram-positive and negative bacteria with Escherichia coli were the most common bacteria in CD and cDC. Both groups also showed significant growth of Enterococci , Streptococci , and anaerobic bacteria in culture. Klebsiella pneumoniae was significantly more prevalent in patients with CD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Colorectal Disease\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Colorectal Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2022.2022-9-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2022.2022-9-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较克罗恩病(CD)和并发大肠憩室炎(cDC)患者腹腔内脓肿的微生物学特征。方法:回顾性、队列、初步研究。纳入标准为接受经皮超声/计算机断层扫描(CT)引导下脓肿引流或抽吸的成年患者。对所有患者进行培养并进行革兰氏染色检测。调查人口统计学资料、CD术前用药情况、脓肿大小、引流后抗生素覆盖情况、脓肿复发情况、手术切除情况、切除类型及术后并发症。结果:本初步研究共纳入44例CD (n=18)和cDC (n=26)患者。CD和cDC的革兰氏阳性和阴性菌多为混合菌,而cDC的革兰氏阴性菌多为混合菌(p=0.029)。两组中最常见的细菌是大肠杆菌。cDC患者中最常见的菌群为厌氧菌,其次为链球菌、肠球菌、广谱β -内酰胺酶产生菌、假单胞菌、摩根菌和变形杆菌。结论:革兰氏阳性和阴性混合菌与大肠杆菌是CD和cDC中最常见的菌群。两组培养中肠球菌、链球菌和厌氧菌均有显著生长。肺炎克雷伯菌在乳糜泻患者中更为普遍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Microbiological Profile of Drained Intra-Abdominal Abscess in Patients with Crohn’s Disease and Colonic Diverticulitis
Aim: To investigate the microbiological profile of intra-abdominal abscesses drained from patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) compared to patients with complicated diverticulitis coli (cDC). Method: This was a retrospective, cohort, pilot study. Inclusion criteria were adult patients who underwent percutaneous ultrasonographic/computed tomography (CT) guided drainage or aspiration of abscess. Cultures were performed for all patients and tested with Gram staining. Demographic data, pre-operative medications taken for CD, abscess size, antibiotic coverage after drainage, abscess recurrence, surgical resection, resection type and post-operative complications were investigated. Results: A total 44 patients with CD (n=18) and cDC (n=26) were investigated in this pilot study. Cultures showed mostly mixed Gram-positive and negative bacteria in both CD and cDC, but Gram-negative culture was more prevalent in cDC (p=0.029). The most common bacteria was Escherichia coli in both groups. Anaerobic bacteria were the second most common flora in patients with cDC, while Streptococcus , Enterococcus , Extended spectrum Beta Lactamase-producing organisms, Pseudomonas , Morganella and Proteus were the second most common in patients with CD. Conclusion: Mixed Gram-positive and negative bacteria with Escherichia coli were the most common bacteria in CD and cDC. Both groups also showed significant growth of Enterococci , Streptococci , and anaerobic bacteria in culture. Klebsiella pneumoniae was significantly more prevalent in patients with CD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Elective and Emergency Surgery for Crohn’s Disease: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study Outcomes of Crystallized Phenol Treatment in Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease and Factors Affecting Recurrence: A Retrospective Study Surgical Outcomes After Colorectal Surgery for Intestinal Deep Endometriosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Colon Surgery for the Treatment of T4 Colon Cancer in a Tertiary Care Institution Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis External Sphincter-Sparing Anal Fistulotomy Plus Seton Drainage for Complex Fistula-In-Ano
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1