21世纪的学术写作:来自英语和印度尼西亚讲师的声音

Saepa Wastam, Lala Bumela, Septi Gumiandari
{"title":"21世纪的学术写作:来自英语和印度尼西亚讲师的声音","authors":"Saepa Wastam, Lala Bumela, Septi Gumiandari","doi":"10.24235/eltecho.v8i1.13626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academic writing is a general skill that must be mastered by every college graduate, especially those majoring in English Language Education. However, academic writing is the most neglected language skill in education in Indonesia. It is believed that poor and outdated pedagogy as well as the low quality of teachers are the main factors that makes academic writing more challenging to learn. Furthermore, in the context of 21st century, each learner should be equipped with bi/multilingual proficiency as a key instrument for global communication, and, therefore, a sound language pedagogy is the one that helps learners to develop their bilingual academic proficiency. This current study critically gathered insights from six respondents on the nature of academic writing both in English and in Indonesian language and the role it plays in the acceleration of knowledge building in their own fields. Qualitative research was employed. The collected voices were transcribed and analyzed in the forms of thematic analysis and word clouds. The results of the study show that the respondents (especially the lecturers) have not provided key arguments on how bilingual academic literacy should be approached. However, other respondents believed that academic writing (pedagogy and assessment) should be approached differently. Innovation in academic literacy pedagogy in Indonesia should be addressed soon. This study concludes that it takes more time and effort to conceptualize the notion of bilingual academic literacy in Indonesian higher education context. This study is expected to provide key insights on how innovation on academic literacy innovation should be addressed.","PeriodicalId":32853,"journal":{"name":"ELT Echo The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academic Writing in the 21st Century: Voices from English and Indonesian Lecturers\",\"authors\":\"Saepa Wastam, Lala Bumela, Septi Gumiandari\",\"doi\":\"10.24235/eltecho.v8i1.13626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Academic writing is a general skill that must be mastered by every college graduate, especially those majoring in English Language Education. However, academic writing is the most neglected language skill in education in Indonesia. It is believed that poor and outdated pedagogy as well as the low quality of teachers are the main factors that makes academic writing more challenging to learn. Furthermore, in the context of 21st century, each learner should be equipped with bi/multilingual proficiency as a key instrument for global communication, and, therefore, a sound language pedagogy is the one that helps learners to develop their bilingual academic proficiency. This current study critically gathered insights from six respondents on the nature of academic writing both in English and in Indonesian language and the role it plays in the acceleration of knowledge building in their own fields. Qualitative research was employed. The collected voices were transcribed and analyzed in the forms of thematic analysis and word clouds. The results of the study show that the respondents (especially the lecturers) have not provided key arguments on how bilingual academic literacy should be approached. However, other respondents believed that academic writing (pedagogy and assessment) should be approached differently. Innovation in academic literacy pedagogy in Indonesia should be addressed soon. This study concludes that it takes more time and effort to conceptualize the notion of bilingual academic literacy in Indonesian higher education context. This study is expected to provide key insights on how innovation on academic literacy innovation should be addressed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ELT Echo The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ELT Echo The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24235/eltecho.v8i1.13626\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELT Echo The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24235/eltecho.v8i1.13626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学术写作是每个大学毕业生都必须掌握的一项普遍技能,尤其是那些英语语言教育专业的毕业生。然而,学术写作是印尼教育中最被忽视的语言技能。人们认为,落后的教学方法和教师素质低下是学术写作更难学习的主要因素。此外,在21世纪的背景下,每个学习者都应该具备双语/多语能力,作为全球交流的关键工具,因此,健全的语言教学法是帮助学习者发展双语学术能力的方法。当前的这项研究批判性地收集了六位受访者对英语和印尼语学术写作性质的见解,以及它在加速他们自己领域的知识建设中所起的作用。采用质性研究。将收集到的声音进行转录,并以主题分析和词云的形式进行分析。研究结果表明,受访者(尤其是讲师)没有就如何实现双语学术素养提供关键论据。然而,其他受访者认为学术写作(教学和评估)应该采用不同的方法。印尼学术扫盲教学法的创新应尽快得到解决。本研究的结论是,在印尼高等教育背景下,双语学术素养概念的概念化需要更多的时间和精力。本研究旨在为如何解决学术素养创新提供关键见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Academic Writing in the 21st Century: Voices from English and Indonesian Lecturers
Academic writing is a general skill that must be mastered by every college graduate, especially those majoring in English Language Education. However, academic writing is the most neglected language skill in education in Indonesia. It is believed that poor and outdated pedagogy as well as the low quality of teachers are the main factors that makes academic writing more challenging to learn. Furthermore, in the context of 21st century, each learner should be equipped with bi/multilingual proficiency as a key instrument for global communication, and, therefore, a sound language pedagogy is the one that helps learners to develop their bilingual academic proficiency. This current study critically gathered insights from six respondents on the nature of academic writing both in English and in Indonesian language and the role it plays in the acceleration of knowledge building in their own fields. Qualitative research was employed. The collected voices were transcribed and analyzed in the forms of thematic analysis and word clouds. The results of the study show that the respondents (especially the lecturers) have not provided key arguments on how bilingual academic literacy should be approached. However, other respondents believed that academic writing (pedagogy and assessment) should be approached differently. Innovation in academic literacy pedagogy in Indonesia should be addressed soon. This study concludes that it takes more time and effort to conceptualize the notion of bilingual academic literacy in Indonesian higher education context. This study is expected to provide key insights on how innovation on academic literacy innovation should be addressed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
University Students’ Critical Literacy in Their Speaking Skill Flipped Classroom for Teaching English at Senior High Schools in Banjarmasin EFL Teachers’ TPACK and Their Espoused Use of ICT Based on SAMR Models Investigating English Education Master Students' Perceptions on Critical Thinking Skills Successful English Learners’ Autonomy: A Look into The Perspective of Ecology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1