折叠的目光:看南亚的法律文件

IF 0.5 0 ASIAN STUDIES South Asian Studies Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/02666030.2021.1988245
M. Sehdev, Piyel Haldar
{"title":"折叠的目光:看南亚的法律文件","authors":"M. Sehdev, Piyel Haldar","doi":"10.1080/02666030.2021.1988245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay, we investigate the aesthetic and material qualities of South Asian paper, and paper-like mediums including leaves, scrolls, and cloth – and the means through which they invite the gaze. The very materiality of paper, we suggest, structures the reception and interpretation of what is written upon it. In Western bureaucracy, the transition from oral to print culture, during the 15th – 16th centuries, made use of the empty page as a surface upon which to create chart-based forms that could reduce the mediations of narrative, thereby increasing legibility and directing the gaze in an economical and forensic manner. While similar acts of transposition have taken hold in South Asian bureaucracies, largely in consequence of Western colonial practices, we claim that South Asian material practices persist in giving contemporary paper documents a different significance. Our essay considers the artifice enabled by paper and its precursors – not through abstract demonstrations of sovereignty, but through the immanent capacities of paper for rolling, folding, and covering. That legal authority can be represented through the grand symbolism of office (coats of arms; state emblems) has been analysed by recent scholars. Our concern, however, is with the corporeal and visual, with handling and viewing, and with way documents can be manipulated in ways that betray their power. Picking up paper from the ancient, medieval, colonial and contemporary periods, across South Asia, we investigate the palm-leaf printed manuscript, calligraphic documents, and other paper forms, while also attending to the present-day documentary practices of litigants in the Indian lower courts.","PeriodicalId":52006,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Folded Gaze: Looking at Legal Documents in South Asia\",\"authors\":\"M. Sehdev, Piyel Haldar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02666030.2021.1988245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this essay, we investigate the aesthetic and material qualities of South Asian paper, and paper-like mediums including leaves, scrolls, and cloth – and the means through which they invite the gaze. The very materiality of paper, we suggest, structures the reception and interpretation of what is written upon it. In Western bureaucracy, the transition from oral to print culture, during the 15th – 16th centuries, made use of the empty page as a surface upon which to create chart-based forms that could reduce the mediations of narrative, thereby increasing legibility and directing the gaze in an economical and forensic manner. While similar acts of transposition have taken hold in South Asian bureaucracies, largely in consequence of Western colonial practices, we claim that South Asian material practices persist in giving contemporary paper documents a different significance. Our essay considers the artifice enabled by paper and its precursors – not through abstract demonstrations of sovereignty, but through the immanent capacities of paper for rolling, folding, and covering. That legal authority can be represented through the grand symbolism of office (coats of arms; state emblems) has been analysed by recent scholars. Our concern, however, is with the corporeal and visual, with handling and viewing, and with way documents can be manipulated in ways that betray their power. Picking up paper from the ancient, medieval, colonial and contemporary periods, across South Asia, we investigate the palm-leaf printed manuscript, calligraphic documents, and other paper forms, while also attending to the present-day documentary practices of litigants in the Indian lower courts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South Asian Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South Asian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1095\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02666030.2021.1988245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1095","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02666030.2021.1988245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在这篇文章中,我们研究了南亚纸的美学和材料品质,以及像纸一样的媒介,包括树叶、卷轴和布——以及它们吸引人们目光的方式。我们认为,正是纸的物质性构成了对纸上所写内容的接受和解释。在西方的官僚体系中,15 - 16世纪从口头文化向印刷文化的过渡,利用空白的页面作为表面,在其上创建基于图表的形式,可以减少叙事的中介,从而提高可读性,并以经济和司法的方式引导视线。虽然南亚的官僚机构中也出现了类似的转换行为,这主要是西方殖民实践的结果,但我们认为,南亚的材料实践坚持赋予当代纸质文件不同的意义。我们的文章考虑了纸张及其前身所带来的技巧——不是通过抽象的主权展示,而是通过纸张内在的滚动、折叠和覆盖的能力。这种法律权威可以通过办公室的宏大象征(徽章;近年来学者们对国徽进行了分析。然而,我们关心的是物质和视觉,处理和观看,以及文件可能被以背叛其权力的方式操纵的方式。从古代,中世纪,殖民时期和当代时期,在整个南亚,我们调查了棕榈叶印刷手稿,书法文件和其他纸质形式,同时也参加了在印度下级法院诉讼当事人的当今文件实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Folded Gaze: Looking at Legal Documents in South Asia
In this essay, we investigate the aesthetic and material qualities of South Asian paper, and paper-like mediums including leaves, scrolls, and cloth – and the means through which they invite the gaze. The very materiality of paper, we suggest, structures the reception and interpretation of what is written upon it. In Western bureaucracy, the transition from oral to print culture, during the 15th – 16th centuries, made use of the empty page as a surface upon which to create chart-based forms that could reduce the mediations of narrative, thereby increasing legibility and directing the gaze in an economical and forensic manner. While similar acts of transposition have taken hold in South Asian bureaucracies, largely in consequence of Western colonial practices, we claim that South Asian material practices persist in giving contemporary paper documents a different significance. Our essay considers the artifice enabled by paper and its precursors – not through abstract demonstrations of sovereignty, but through the immanent capacities of paper for rolling, folding, and covering. That legal authority can be represented through the grand symbolism of office (coats of arms; state emblems) has been analysed by recent scholars. Our concern, however, is with the corporeal and visual, with handling and viewing, and with way documents can be manipulated in ways that betray their power. Picking up paper from the ancient, medieval, colonial and contemporary periods, across South Asia, we investigate the palm-leaf printed manuscript, calligraphic documents, and other paper forms, while also attending to the present-day documentary practices of litigants in the Indian lower courts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South Asian Studies
South Asian Studies ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Were the Cretulae (Clay Sealings) from the Indus Port Town of Lothal Part of an Administrative Archive? Contextual, Interpretive, and Comparative Evidence Mudgagiri, a Pāla “Jayaskandhāvāra”: An Assessment of Recent Sculptural and Inscriptional Findings at Munger, Bihar Bamiyan Comes to Bangkok: Situating the Buddha of the Cave Museum at Wat Saket Why Ananda Coomaraswamy’s Time in Sri Lanka (Still) Matters Aesthetic of Light and Time: An Intellectual History of Pictorialism from India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1