持续和复发宫颈癌患者盆腔切除:来自白俄罗斯的病例系列

IF 0.3 Q4 ONCOLOGY International Journal of Surgery-Oncology Pub Date : 2021-03-19 DOI:10.29337/IJSONCO.24
O. P. Matylevich, K. Schmeler, S. Polyakov, S. Mavrichev, I. Kosenko, S. Krasny
{"title":"持续和复发宫颈癌患者盆腔切除:来自白俄罗斯的病例系列","authors":"O. P. Matylevich, K. Schmeler, S. Polyakov, S. Mavrichev, I. Kosenko, S. Krasny","doi":"10.29337/IJSONCO.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: The prognosis of patients with persistent or recurrent cervical cancer (CC) is poor, and patient selection for exenterative surgery is challenging. The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of patients undergoing pelvic exenteration (PE) for persistent or recurrent CC after treatment with radiotherapy in Belarus. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of 22 patients with persistent and recurrent CC who underwent supralevator PE from 2006 to 2012 at NN Alexandrov National Cancer Centre. Anterior PE was performed in 16 (72.7%) patients, posterior PE in 2 (9.1%) and total PE in 4 (18.2%) patients. RESULTS: The mean surgical procedure time was 289.1 minutes. Urinary diversion was performed in 20 patients: 5 (25.0%) underwent ureterostomy and 15 (75.0%) underwent neobladder formation. Fecal diversion with end colostomy (Hartman’s procedure) was performed in 5 patients and in one patient a rectosigmoid resection with anastomosis was performed. The median follow-up time was 87 months (range, 4.4–146.0 months). To date, 16 (72.7%) patients have died of cervical cancer and there were no deaths due to other causes. The median survival was 17 months with a 5-year survival rate of 31.8% (SE 9.9%). Cox regression analysis showed that surgical margin status and pelvic lymph node involvement were independent risk factors for survival. CONCLUSIONS: PE was found to be a safe and feasible option for patients with persistent or recurrent cervical cancer who do not have other potentially curative treatment options. Careful patient selection is needed to determine which patients will benefit from this treatment. HIGHLIGHTS: Treatment options are limited for patients with persistent or recurrent cervical cancer Pelvic exenteration is a safe and feasible option for women in Belarus Positive surgical margins and positive lymph node status are risk factors affecting survival","PeriodicalId":42930,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery-Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pelvic Exenteration in Patients with Persistent and Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Case Series from Belarus\",\"authors\":\"O. P. Matylevich, K. Schmeler, S. Polyakov, S. Mavrichev, I. Kosenko, S. Krasny\",\"doi\":\"10.29337/IJSONCO.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: The prognosis of patients with persistent or recurrent cervical cancer (CC) is poor, and patient selection for exenterative surgery is challenging. The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of patients undergoing pelvic exenteration (PE) for persistent or recurrent CC after treatment with radiotherapy in Belarus. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of 22 patients with persistent and recurrent CC who underwent supralevator PE from 2006 to 2012 at NN Alexandrov National Cancer Centre. Anterior PE was performed in 16 (72.7%) patients, posterior PE in 2 (9.1%) and total PE in 4 (18.2%) patients. RESULTS: The mean surgical procedure time was 289.1 minutes. Urinary diversion was performed in 20 patients: 5 (25.0%) underwent ureterostomy and 15 (75.0%) underwent neobladder formation. Fecal diversion with end colostomy (Hartman’s procedure) was performed in 5 patients and in one patient a rectosigmoid resection with anastomosis was performed. The median follow-up time was 87 months (range, 4.4–146.0 months). To date, 16 (72.7%) patients have died of cervical cancer and there were no deaths due to other causes. The median survival was 17 months with a 5-year survival rate of 31.8% (SE 9.9%). Cox regression analysis showed that surgical margin status and pelvic lymph node involvement were independent risk factors for survival. CONCLUSIONS: PE was found to be a safe and feasible option for patients with persistent or recurrent cervical cancer who do not have other potentially curative treatment options. Careful patient selection is needed to determine which patients will benefit from this treatment. HIGHLIGHTS: Treatment options are limited for patients with persistent or recurrent cervical cancer Pelvic exenteration is a safe and feasible option for women in Belarus Positive surgical margins and positive lymph node status are risk factors affecting survival\",\"PeriodicalId\":42930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Surgery-Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Surgery-Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29337/IJSONCO.24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29337/IJSONCO.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:持续性或复发性宫颈癌(CC)患者预后较差,患者选择肠外手术具有挑战性。本研究的目的是确定白俄罗斯接受盆腔切除(PE)治疗持续性或复发性CC的患者在放疗后的结果。方法:回顾性研究了2006年至2012年在NN Alexandrov国家癌症中心接受上提肌PE治疗的22例持续性和复发性CC患者。前路PE 16例(72.7%),后路PE 2例(9.1%),全路PE 4例(18.2%)。结果:平均手术时间为289.1分钟。20例患者行尿分流术:5例(25.0%)行输尿管造口术,15例(75.0%)行新膀胱形成术。5例患者行粪便分流并末端结肠造口术(Hartman手术),1例患者行直肠乙状结肠切除术并吻合。中位随访时间为87个月(4.4 ~ 146.0个月)。迄今为止,有16名(72.7%)患者死于子宫颈癌,没有其他原因导致的死亡。中位生存期为17个月,5年生存率为31.8% (SE 9.9%)。Cox回归分析显示手术切缘状态和盆腔淋巴结受累是生存的独立危险因素。结论:对于没有其他潜在治愈选择的持续性或复发宫颈癌患者,PE是一种安全可行的选择。需要仔细选择患者,以确定哪些患者将从这种治疗中受益。在白俄罗斯,盆腔切除术是一种安全可行的选择,手术切缘阳性和淋巴结阳性是影响生存的危险因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pelvic Exenteration in Patients with Persistent and Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Case Series from Belarus
INTRODUCTION: The prognosis of patients with persistent or recurrent cervical cancer (CC) is poor, and patient selection for exenterative surgery is challenging. The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of patients undergoing pelvic exenteration (PE) for persistent or recurrent CC after treatment with radiotherapy in Belarus. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of 22 patients with persistent and recurrent CC who underwent supralevator PE from 2006 to 2012 at NN Alexandrov National Cancer Centre. Anterior PE was performed in 16 (72.7%) patients, posterior PE in 2 (9.1%) and total PE in 4 (18.2%) patients. RESULTS: The mean surgical procedure time was 289.1 minutes. Urinary diversion was performed in 20 patients: 5 (25.0%) underwent ureterostomy and 15 (75.0%) underwent neobladder formation. Fecal diversion with end colostomy (Hartman’s procedure) was performed in 5 patients and in one patient a rectosigmoid resection with anastomosis was performed. The median follow-up time was 87 months (range, 4.4–146.0 months). To date, 16 (72.7%) patients have died of cervical cancer and there were no deaths due to other causes. The median survival was 17 months with a 5-year survival rate of 31.8% (SE 9.9%). Cox regression analysis showed that surgical margin status and pelvic lymph node involvement were independent risk factors for survival. CONCLUSIONS: PE was found to be a safe and feasible option for patients with persistent or recurrent cervical cancer who do not have other potentially curative treatment options. Careful patient selection is needed to determine which patients will benefit from this treatment. HIGHLIGHTS: Treatment options are limited for patients with persistent or recurrent cervical cancer Pelvic exenteration is a safe and feasible option for women in Belarus Positive surgical margins and positive lymph node status are risk factors affecting survival
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Retifanlimab: a breakthrough for the management of Merkel cell carcinoma Outcomes of the distal rectal cancer treatment depending on the type of sphincter-sparing surgery Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the urachus: a practical overview of a broad differential diagnosis: case report Spatial and temporal epidemiological analysis on the mortality rate of female breast cancer in Suzhou, China: 2006–2020 Role of Denosumab in the Management of Giant Cell Tumor, a Cross Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1