加布里埃尔·丹尼尔斯和伊斯梅尔·休斯顿-琼斯的新叙事

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE JNT-JOURNAL OF NARRATIVE THEORY Pub Date : 2021-12-22 DOI:10.1353/jnt.2021.0014
D. Grundy
{"title":"加布里埃尔·丹尼尔斯和伊斯梅尔·休斯顿-琼斯的新叙事","authors":"D. Grundy","doi":"10.1353/jnt.2021.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Originating as a private joke between Robert Glück and Bruce Boone (Jackson 26), the term ‘New Narrative’ is as capacious as it is specific: as concerned with coterie poetics as with movement-building, with gossip as with political discourse, with sex as with death. For Dodie Bellamy and Kevin Killian, New Narrative is more “sensibility” than “genre” (482). For Steve Abbott, meanwhile, New Narrative “ar[ose] out of specific social and political concerns of specific communities” (“Soup Intro” 1). Such communities refer, firstly, to the specific groupings of writers who socialized, shared intimate relationships, referenced each other in their work, and described themselves or were described by others as being practitioners of New Narrative. These writers were predominantly, though not exclusively, gay white men based in San Francisco. But Abbott’s definition extended beyond this group. Abbott conceived of New Narrative as a descriptor of what was already happening across as well as within multiple communities politicized by their variously marginalized experiences. New Narrative thus existed as both a writing practice and an organizational imperative: from the ambitious 1981 Left/Write conference organized by Abbott, Boone, and Glück, to the smaller-scale workshops held at Small Press Traffic bookstore, which in turn intersected with workshops held by Gloria Anzaldúa and the activities of the Women Writers Union (WWU).2 Boone’s important theoretical work of the period, including the pamphlet","PeriodicalId":42787,"journal":{"name":"JNT-JOURNAL OF NARRATIVE THEORY","volume":"40 1","pages":"296 - 325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Narratives in Gabrielle Daniels and Ishmael Houston-Jones\",\"authors\":\"D. Grundy\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jnt.2021.0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Originating as a private joke between Robert Glück and Bruce Boone (Jackson 26), the term ‘New Narrative’ is as capacious as it is specific: as concerned with coterie poetics as with movement-building, with gossip as with political discourse, with sex as with death. For Dodie Bellamy and Kevin Killian, New Narrative is more “sensibility” than “genre” (482). For Steve Abbott, meanwhile, New Narrative “ar[ose] out of specific social and political concerns of specific communities” (“Soup Intro” 1). Such communities refer, firstly, to the specific groupings of writers who socialized, shared intimate relationships, referenced each other in their work, and described themselves or were described by others as being practitioners of New Narrative. These writers were predominantly, though not exclusively, gay white men based in San Francisco. But Abbott’s definition extended beyond this group. Abbott conceived of New Narrative as a descriptor of what was already happening across as well as within multiple communities politicized by their variously marginalized experiences. New Narrative thus existed as both a writing practice and an organizational imperative: from the ambitious 1981 Left/Write conference organized by Abbott, Boone, and Glück, to the smaller-scale workshops held at Small Press Traffic bookstore, which in turn intersected with workshops held by Gloria Anzaldúa and the activities of the Women Writers Union (WWU).2 Boone’s important theoretical work of the period, including the pamphlet\",\"PeriodicalId\":42787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JNT-JOURNAL OF NARRATIVE THEORY\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"296 - 325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JNT-JOURNAL OF NARRATIVE THEORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jnt.2021.0014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNT-JOURNAL OF NARRATIVE THEORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jnt.2021.0014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“新叙事”一词起源于罗伯特·格尔 (Robert gl ck)和布鲁斯·布恩(Bruce Boone,杰克逊26岁)之间的一个私人玩笑,它既宽泛又具体:既涉及小圈子诗学,也涉及运动建设;既涉及八卦,也涉及政治话语;既涉及性,也涉及死亡。对于多迪·贝拉米和凯文·基利安来说,《新叙事》更注重“感性”而非“体裁”(482)。与此同时,对于史蒂夫·阿博特来说,新叙事“来自于特定群体的特定社会和政治关注”(“Soup Intro”1)。这些群体首先指的是一群特定的作家,他们社交化、共享亲密关系,在作品中相互引用,并将自己或被他人描述为新叙事的实践者。这些作家主要是居住在旧金山的白人同性恋男性,尽管并非全部。但雅培的定义超出了这个群体。阿博特认为,新叙事是对已经发生的事情的描述,以及在多个社区内发生的事情,这些社区被各种边缘化的经历政治化了。因此,新叙事既是一种写作实践,也是一种组织要求:从1981年由雅培、布恩和格莱斯克组织的雄心勃勃的左派/写作会议,到在小出版社交通书店举办的小规模研讨会,这些研讨会又与格洛丽亚Anzaldúa举办的研讨会和妇女作家联盟(WWU)的活动相交叉布恩在那个时期的重要理论著作,包括这本小册子
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New Narratives in Gabrielle Daniels and Ishmael Houston-Jones
Originating as a private joke between Robert Glück and Bruce Boone (Jackson 26), the term ‘New Narrative’ is as capacious as it is specific: as concerned with coterie poetics as with movement-building, with gossip as with political discourse, with sex as with death. For Dodie Bellamy and Kevin Killian, New Narrative is more “sensibility” than “genre” (482). For Steve Abbott, meanwhile, New Narrative “ar[ose] out of specific social and political concerns of specific communities” (“Soup Intro” 1). Such communities refer, firstly, to the specific groupings of writers who socialized, shared intimate relationships, referenced each other in their work, and described themselves or were described by others as being practitioners of New Narrative. These writers were predominantly, though not exclusively, gay white men based in San Francisco. But Abbott’s definition extended beyond this group. Abbott conceived of New Narrative as a descriptor of what was already happening across as well as within multiple communities politicized by their variously marginalized experiences. New Narrative thus existed as both a writing practice and an organizational imperative: from the ambitious 1981 Left/Write conference organized by Abbott, Boone, and Glück, to the smaller-scale workshops held at Small Press Traffic bookstore, which in turn intersected with workshops held by Gloria Anzaldúa and the activities of the Women Writers Union (WWU).2 Boone’s important theoretical work of the period, including the pamphlet
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1971 as the Journal of Narrative Technique, JNT (now the Journal of Narrative Theory) has provided a forum for the theoretical exploration of narrative in all its forms. Building on this foundation, JNT publishes essays addressing the epistemological, global, historical, formal, and political dimensions of narrative from a variety of methodological and theoretical perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Interpreting Timbuktu: An Unnatural Narrative, an Emotional Reading Experience, and a Cognitive Explanation Flirting with Filler in Our Mutual Friend Estrangement as Method in Trauma Narratives Emotional Geographies of Belonging in Ravinder Randhawa's Beauty and the Beast "September didn't know what sort of story she was in": The Hybrid Genres of Uncanny Fairy Tales
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1