STAD模型、TGT和TTW对学生的科学学习结果的比较

Zelhendri Zen, Reflianto Reflianto, Syamsuar Syamsuar, Farida Ariani
{"title":"STAD模型、TGT和TTW对学生的科学学习结果的比较","authors":"Zelhendri Zen, Reflianto Reflianto, Syamsuar Syamsuar, Farida Ariani","doi":"10.24036/pedagogi.v23i1.1543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, interest in exploring the effectiveness of different cooperative learning models in promoting science learning outcomes for high school students has been increasing. The three most studied models are STAD (Student Teams Achievement Divisions), TGT (Teams-Games-Tournaments), and TTW (Think-Talk-Write). The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the STAD, TGT, and TTW models on science learning outcomes of class VII students in junior high school. The research method was an experimental study with a comparative design. The results showed a significant difference in science learning outcomes among students taught using the three cooperative learning models. The TGT and TTW models did not show a significant difference in learning outcomes, although the TGT model showed better learning outcomes than the STAD and TTW models. This study also highlights the importance of considering specific learning objectives and student characteristics when selecting and adapting cooperative learning models. While the TTW and TGT models can be effective alternatives to the STAD model in improving science learning outcomes for junior high school students, further research is needed to explore the long-term effectiveness and generalizability of these models in different contexts","PeriodicalId":34325,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogi","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perbandingan Efektivitas Model STAD, TGT, DAN TTW Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa\",\"authors\":\"Zelhendri Zen, Reflianto Reflianto, Syamsuar Syamsuar, Farida Ariani\",\"doi\":\"10.24036/pedagogi.v23i1.1543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, interest in exploring the effectiveness of different cooperative learning models in promoting science learning outcomes for high school students has been increasing. The three most studied models are STAD (Student Teams Achievement Divisions), TGT (Teams-Games-Tournaments), and TTW (Think-Talk-Write). The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the STAD, TGT, and TTW models on science learning outcomes of class VII students in junior high school. The research method was an experimental study with a comparative design. The results showed a significant difference in science learning outcomes among students taught using the three cooperative learning models. The TGT and TTW models did not show a significant difference in learning outcomes, although the TGT model showed better learning outcomes than the STAD and TTW models. This study also highlights the importance of considering specific learning objectives and student characteristics when selecting and adapting cooperative learning models. While the TTW and TGT models can be effective alternatives to the STAD model in improving science learning outcomes for junior high school students, further research is needed to explore the long-term effectiveness and generalizability of these models in different contexts\",\"PeriodicalId\":34325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pedagogi\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pedagogi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24036/pedagogi.v23i1.1543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/pedagogi.v23i1.1543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,探索不同合作学习模式在促进高中生科学学习成果方面的有效性的兴趣越来越大。研究最多的三种模式是STAD(学生团队成就部门),TGT(团队-游戏-比赛)和TTW(思考-谈话-写作)。本研究的目的是比较STAD、TGT和TTW模型对初七班学生科学学习成果的影响。研究方法为比较设计的实验研究。结果显示,使用三种合作学习模式的学生在科学学习成果上存在显著差异。TGT模型的学习效果优于STAD模型和TTW模型,但TGT模型的学习效果差异不显著。本研究还强调了在选择和适应合作学习模式时考虑特定学习目标和学生特征的重要性。虽然TTW和TGT模型可以作为STAD模型的有效替代模型来改善初中生科学学习成果,但需要进一步研究这些模型在不同情境下的长期有效性和可推广性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perbandingan Efektivitas Model STAD, TGT, DAN TTW Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa
In recent years, interest in exploring the effectiveness of different cooperative learning models in promoting science learning outcomes for high school students has been increasing. The three most studied models are STAD (Student Teams Achievement Divisions), TGT (Teams-Games-Tournaments), and TTW (Think-Talk-Write). The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the STAD, TGT, and TTW models on science learning outcomes of class VII students in junior high school. The research method was an experimental study with a comparative design. The results showed a significant difference in science learning outcomes among students taught using the three cooperative learning models. The TGT and TTW models did not show a significant difference in learning outcomes, although the TGT model showed better learning outcomes than the STAD and TTW models. This study also highlights the importance of considering specific learning objectives and student characteristics when selecting and adapting cooperative learning models. While the TTW and TGT models can be effective alternatives to the STAD model in improving science learning outcomes for junior high school students, further research is needed to explore the long-term effectiveness and generalizability of these models in different contexts
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
SUFI ULAMA DA'WAH ACTIVITIES IN BARUS: A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW SELF-MOTIVATION IN IMPROVING LIBRARIAN PERFORMANCE AT UNIVERSITAS SARI MUTIARA INDONESIA LIBRARY DATOK INSTITUTE LAKSAMANA WEAVING MOTIVES OF MALAY SONGKET WEAVING IN LANGKAT: STUDY OF LOCAL WISDOM CHARACTER EDUCATION MODELS ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION STRATEGY IN MINIMIZING FOOD WASTE AT KFC MEDAN ACEH EAST COAST COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (HISTORICAL STUDY AND EXISTENCE OF KUALA LANGSA PORT AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO THE GOVERNMENT OF 1900-2018)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1