John-James Wilson, C. Fisher, Tereza Senfeld, T. J. Shannon, J. M. Collinson
{"title":"1904年,萨尔瓦多褐藻(Haplopelia forbesi Salvadori)错综复杂的命名史:福布斯和罗宾逊一直都是对的吗?","authors":"John-James Wilson, C. Fisher, Tereza Senfeld, T. J. Shannon, J. M. Collinson","doi":"10.25226/bboc.v142i1.2022.a7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary. The specimen in Liverpool known as Forbes' Lemon Dove, collected pre-1844 purportedly in Cayenne (French Guiana), was catalogued by Forbes & Robinson in 1900 as Haplopelia principalis, despite this species having been described from the island of Príncipe in the Gulf of Guinea. As a result of the discrepancy in localities, the Liverpool specimen was subsequently described as a new species (Haplopelia forbesi) by Salvadori and suggested to be from West Africa. Over the course of the next century, the new taxon was subject to a variety of taxonomic treatments. To investigate the status and provenance of Forbes' Lemon Dove, we obtained a 472 bp cyt-b sequence from the specimen. This possessed 100% similarity with a Lemon Dove Columba (Aplopelia) larvata sequence from Príncipe and 99.79% similarity with a sequence of the same species from São Tomé. This suggests that Forbes & Robinson were correct that the specimen represents A. larvata principalis and was thus probably collected on Príncipe. However, more sequencing from across the Lemon Dove's range is required to resolve the taxonomy of this complex group and place Forbes' Lemon Dove more definitively.","PeriodicalId":38973,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the British Ornithologists'' Club","volume":"31 1","pages":"131 - 137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The tangled nomenclatural history of Haplopelia forbesi Salvadori, 1904: were Forbes and Robinson right all along?\",\"authors\":\"John-James Wilson, C. Fisher, Tereza Senfeld, T. J. Shannon, J. M. Collinson\",\"doi\":\"10.25226/bboc.v142i1.2022.a7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary. The specimen in Liverpool known as Forbes' Lemon Dove, collected pre-1844 purportedly in Cayenne (French Guiana), was catalogued by Forbes & Robinson in 1900 as Haplopelia principalis, despite this species having been described from the island of Príncipe in the Gulf of Guinea. As a result of the discrepancy in localities, the Liverpool specimen was subsequently described as a new species (Haplopelia forbesi) by Salvadori and suggested to be from West Africa. Over the course of the next century, the new taxon was subject to a variety of taxonomic treatments. To investigate the status and provenance of Forbes' Lemon Dove, we obtained a 472 bp cyt-b sequence from the specimen. This possessed 100% similarity with a Lemon Dove Columba (Aplopelia) larvata sequence from Príncipe and 99.79% similarity with a sequence of the same species from São Tomé. This suggests that Forbes & Robinson were correct that the specimen represents A. larvata principalis and was thus probably collected on Príncipe. However, more sequencing from across the Lemon Dove's range is required to resolve the taxonomy of this complex group and place Forbes' Lemon Dove more definitively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the British Ornithologists'' Club\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"131 - 137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the British Ornithologists'' Club\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25226/bboc.v142i1.2022.a7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the British Ornithologists'' Club","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25226/bboc.v142i1.2022.a7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
总结。在利物浦发现的被称为“福布斯柠檬鸽”的标本,据说是1844年前在卡宴(法属圭亚那)收集的,1900年被福布斯和罗宾逊编目为“大斑斑鹬”,尽管这个物种是在几内亚湾Príncipe岛被描述的。由于位置上的差异,利物浦标本随后被Salvadori描述为一个新种(forbesi Haplopelia),并被认为来自西非。在接下来的一个世纪里,这个新分类单元受到了各种分类处理。为了研究福布斯柠檬鸽的状态和来源,我们从标本中获得了472 bp的cyt-b序列。这与来自Príncipe的柠檬鸽Columba (Aplopelia)幼虫序列具有100%的相似性,与来自 o tom的同一物种序列具有99.79%的相似性。这表明Forbes和Robinson是正确的,该标本代表A. larvata principalis,因此可能是在Príncipe上收集的。然而,需要对柠檬鸽子的范围进行更多的测序,才能解决这个复杂群体的分类问题,并更明确地确定福布斯的柠檬鸽子。
The tangled nomenclatural history of Haplopelia forbesi Salvadori, 1904: were Forbes and Robinson right all along?
Summary. The specimen in Liverpool known as Forbes' Lemon Dove, collected pre-1844 purportedly in Cayenne (French Guiana), was catalogued by Forbes & Robinson in 1900 as Haplopelia principalis, despite this species having been described from the island of Príncipe in the Gulf of Guinea. As a result of the discrepancy in localities, the Liverpool specimen was subsequently described as a new species (Haplopelia forbesi) by Salvadori and suggested to be from West Africa. Over the course of the next century, the new taxon was subject to a variety of taxonomic treatments. To investigate the status and provenance of Forbes' Lemon Dove, we obtained a 472 bp cyt-b sequence from the specimen. This possessed 100% similarity with a Lemon Dove Columba (Aplopelia) larvata sequence from Príncipe and 99.79% similarity with a sequence of the same species from São Tomé. This suggests that Forbes & Robinson were correct that the specimen represents A. larvata principalis and was thus probably collected on Príncipe. However, more sequencing from across the Lemon Dove's range is required to resolve the taxonomy of this complex group and place Forbes' Lemon Dove more definitively.