Vahid Shojaeimotlagh, Hero Khorshid Hassan, S. Dalvand, A. Dehkordi, Reza Ghanei Gheshlagh
{"title":"护士对呼吸机相关肺炎的知识:系统回顾和meta分析","authors":"Vahid Shojaeimotlagh, Hero Khorshid Hassan, S. Dalvand, A. Dehkordi, Reza Ghanei Gheshlagh","doi":"10.30491/TM.2020.232351.1122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Mechanically ventilated patients are at risk of developing the iatrogenic infection ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Inadequate knowledge of nurses is one of the obstacles to adherence to evidence-based guidelines to prevent VAP. Objectives: This study aimed to estimate the knowledge of nurses about VAP prevention. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, national and international databases, including MagIran, Scientific Information Database (SID), Web of Sciences, PubMed, and Scopus were searched using the following keywords: “Ventilator-associated pneumonia”, “VAP”, “Nosocomial pneumonia”, “Knowledge”, and their possible combinations. The VAP prevention score was calculated according to the questionnaire introduced and validated by Labeau et al. The analyses were performed using Stata (version 12). Results: In the initial search, 1193 articles were found of which a total of 8 articles were included in the analysis. The nurses achieved 48.31% of the VAP prevention total score (Confidence Interval [CI]: 95%: 44.63-52). The lowest and highest VAP prevention scores were attributed to frequency of humidifier changes (15.13%, CI: 95%: 11.35-18.92) and patient positioning (81.03%, CI: 95%: 75.43-86.64), respectively. The percentage of nurses’ knowledge about VAP prevention in Asian studies was higher than that in the European studies (54.71% versus 44.92%). Conclusion: The nurses obtained less than half of the VAP prevention total score. Regular training courses and reviewing VAP prevention guidelines can keep nurses' knowledge up to date.","PeriodicalId":23249,"journal":{"name":"Trauma monthly","volume":"19 1","pages":"180-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurses’ Knowledge on Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Vahid Shojaeimotlagh, Hero Khorshid Hassan, S. Dalvand, A. Dehkordi, Reza Ghanei Gheshlagh\",\"doi\":\"10.30491/TM.2020.232351.1122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Mechanically ventilated patients are at risk of developing the iatrogenic infection ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Inadequate knowledge of nurses is one of the obstacles to adherence to evidence-based guidelines to prevent VAP. Objectives: This study aimed to estimate the knowledge of nurses about VAP prevention. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, national and international databases, including MagIran, Scientific Information Database (SID), Web of Sciences, PubMed, and Scopus were searched using the following keywords: “Ventilator-associated pneumonia”, “VAP”, “Nosocomial pneumonia”, “Knowledge”, and their possible combinations. The VAP prevention score was calculated according to the questionnaire introduced and validated by Labeau et al. The analyses were performed using Stata (version 12). Results: In the initial search, 1193 articles were found of which a total of 8 articles were included in the analysis. The nurses achieved 48.31% of the VAP prevention total score (Confidence Interval [CI]: 95%: 44.63-52). The lowest and highest VAP prevention scores were attributed to frequency of humidifier changes (15.13%, CI: 95%: 11.35-18.92) and patient positioning (81.03%, CI: 95%: 75.43-86.64), respectively. The percentage of nurses’ knowledge about VAP prevention in Asian studies was higher than that in the European studies (54.71% versus 44.92%). Conclusion: The nurses obtained less than half of the VAP prevention total score. Regular training courses and reviewing VAP prevention guidelines can keep nurses' knowledge up to date.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trauma monthly\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"180-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trauma monthly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30491/TM.2020.232351.1122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma monthly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30491/TM.2020.232351.1122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:机械通气患者存在发生医源性感染呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的风险。护士知识不足是阻碍遵守以证据为基础的预防VAP指南的障碍之一。目的:了解护士对VAP预防知识的了解情况。方法:在本系统综述和meta分析中,使用以下关键词:“呼吸机相关性肺炎”、“VAP”、“医院性肺炎”、“Knowledge”及其可能的组合,对MagIran、科学信息数据库(SID)、Web of Sciences、PubMed和Scopus等国内外数据库进行检索。VAP预防评分依据Labeau等引入并验证的问卷计算。使用Stata(版本12)进行分析。结果:初检索共检索到1193篇文献,其中8篇文献被纳入分析。护士VAP预防总得分达到48.31%(置信区间[CI]: 95%: 44.63-52)。最低和最高的VAP预防评分分别归因于加湿器更换频率(15.13%,CI: 95%: 11.35-18.92)和患者体位(81.03%,CI: 95%: 75.43-86.64)。亚洲研究中护士对VAP预防的知晓率高于欧洲研究(54.71%对44.92%)。结论:护士获得的VAP预防总分不到一半。定期培训课程和审查VAP预防指南可以使护士的知识保持最新。
Nurses’ Knowledge on Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Mechanically ventilated patients are at risk of developing the iatrogenic infection ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Inadequate knowledge of nurses is one of the obstacles to adherence to evidence-based guidelines to prevent VAP. Objectives: This study aimed to estimate the knowledge of nurses about VAP prevention. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, national and international databases, including MagIran, Scientific Information Database (SID), Web of Sciences, PubMed, and Scopus were searched using the following keywords: “Ventilator-associated pneumonia”, “VAP”, “Nosocomial pneumonia”, “Knowledge”, and their possible combinations. The VAP prevention score was calculated according to the questionnaire introduced and validated by Labeau et al. The analyses were performed using Stata (version 12). Results: In the initial search, 1193 articles were found of which a total of 8 articles were included in the analysis. The nurses achieved 48.31% of the VAP prevention total score (Confidence Interval [CI]: 95%: 44.63-52). The lowest and highest VAP prevention scores were attributed to frequency of humidifier changes (15.13%, CI: 95%: 11.35-18.92) and patient positioning (81.03%, CI: 95%: 75.43-86.64), respectively. The percentage of nurses’ knowledge about VAP prevention in Asian studies was higher than that in the European studies (54.71% versus 44.92%). Conclusion: The nurses obtained less than half of the VAP prevention total score. Regular training courses and reviewing VAP prevention guidelines can keep nurses' knowledge up to date.