护士对呼吸机相关肺炎的知识:系统回顾和meta分析

IF 0.2 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Trauma monthly Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.30491/TM.2020.232351.1122
Vahid Shojaeimotlagh, Hero Khorshid Hassan, S. Dalvand, A. Dehkordi, Reza Ghanei Gheshlagh
{"title":"护士对呼吸机相关肺炎的知识:系统回顾和meta分析","authors":"Vahid Shojaeimotlagh, Hero Khorshid Hassan, S. Dalvand, A. Dehkordi, Reza Ghanei Gheshlagh","doi":"10.30491/TM.2020.232351.1122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Mechanically ventilated patients are at risk of developing the iatrogenic infection ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Inadequate knowledge of nurses is one of the obstacles to adherence to evidence-based guidelines to prevent VAP. Objectives: This study aimed to estimate the knowledge of nurses about VAP prevention. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, national and international databases, including MagIran, Scientific Information Database (SID), Web of Sciences, PubMed, and Scopus were searched using the following keywords: “Ventilator-associated pneumonia”, “VAP”, “Nosocomial pneumonia”, “Knowledge”, and their possible combinations. The VAP prevention score was calculated according to the questionnaire introduced and validated by Labeau et al.  The analyses were performed using Stata (version 12). Results: In the initial search, 1193 articles were found of which a total of 8 articles were included in the analysis. The nurses achieved 48.31% of the VAP prevention total score (Confidence Interval [CI]: 95%: 44.63-52). The lowest and highest VAP prevention scores were attributed to frequency of humidifier changes (15.13%, CI: 95%: 11.35-18.92) and patient positioning (81.03%, CI: 95%: 75.43-86.64), respectively. The percentage of nurses’ knowledge about VAP prevention in Asian studies was higher than that in the European studies (54.71% versus 44.92%). Conclusion: The nurses obtained less than half of the VAP prevention total score. Regular training courses and reviewing VAP prevention guidelines can keep nurses' knowledge up to date.","PeriodicalId":23249,"journal":{"name":"Trauma monthly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurses’ Knowledge on Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Vahid Shojaeimotlagh, Hero Khorshid Hassan, S. Dalvand, A. Dehkordi, Reza Ghanei Gheshlagh\",\"doi\":\"10.30491/TM.2020.232351.1122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Mechanically ventilated patients are at risk of developing the iatrogenic infection ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Inadequate knowledge of nurses is one of the obstacles to adherence to evidence-based guidelines to prevent VAP. Objectives: This study aimed to estimate the knowledge of nurses about VAP prevention. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, national and international databases, including MagIran, Scientific Information Database (SID), Web of Sciences, PubMed, and Scopus were searched using the following keywords: “Ventilator-associated pneumonia”, “VAP”, “Nosocomial pneumonia”, “Knowledge”, and their possible combinations. The VAP prevention score was calculated according to the questionnaire introduced and validated by Labeau et al.  The analyses were performed using Stata (version 12). Results: In the initial search, 1193 articles were found of which a total of 8 articles were included in the analysis. The nurses achieved 48.31% of the VAP prevention total score (Confidence Interval [CI]: 95%: 44.63-52). The lowest and highest VAP prevention scores were attributed to frequency of humidifier changes (15.13%, CI: 95%: 11.35-18.92) and patient positioning (81.03%, CI: 95%: 75.43-86.64), respectively. The percentage of nurses’ knowledge about VAP prevention in Asian studies was higher than that in the European studies (54.71% versus 44.92%). Conclusion: The nurses obtained less than half of the VAP prevention total score. Regular training courses and reviewing VAP prevention guidelines can keep nurses' knowledge up to date.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trauma monthly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trauma monthly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30491/TM.2020.232351.1122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma monthly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30491/TM.2020.232351.1122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:机械通气患者存在发生医源性感染呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的风险。护士知识不足是阻碍遵守以证据为基础的预防VAP指南的障碍之一。目的:了解护士对VAP预防知识的了解情况。方法:在本系统综述和meta分析中,使用以下关键词:“呼吸机相关性肺炎”、“VAP”、“医院性肺炎”、“Knowledge”及其可能的组合,对MagIran、科学信息数据库(SID)、Web of Sciences、PubMed和Scopus等国内外数据库进行检索。VAP预防评分依据Labeau等引入并验证的问卷计算。使用Stata(版本12)进行分析。结果:初检索共检索到1193篇文献,其中8篇文献被纳入分析。护士VAP预防总得分达到48.31%(置信区间[CI]: 95%: 44.63-52)。最低和最高的VAP预防评分分别归因于加湿器更换频率(15.13%,CI: 95%: 11.35-18.92)和患者体位(81.03%,CI: 95%: 75.43-86.64)。亚洲研究中护士对VAP预防的知晓率高于欧洲研究(54.71%对44.92%)。结论:护士获得的VAP预防总分不到一半。定期培训课程和审查VAP预防指南可以使护士的知识保持最新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nurses’ Knowledge on Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Mechanically ventilated patients are at risk of developing the iatrogenic infection ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Inadequate knowledge of nurses is one of the obstacles to adherence to evidence-based guidelines to prevent VAP. Objectives: This study aimed to estimate the knowledge of nurses about VAP prevention. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, national and international databases, including MagIran, Scientific Information Database (SID), Web of Sciences, PubMed, and Scopus were searched using the following keywords: “Ventilator-associated pneumonia”, “VAP”, “Nosocomial pneumonia”, “Knowledge”, and their possible combinations. The VAP prevention score was calculated according to the questionnaire introduced and validated by Labeau et al.  The analyses were performed using Stata (version 12). Results: In the initial search, 1193 articles were found of which a total of 8 articles were included in the analysis. The nurses achieved 48.31% of the VAP prevention total score (Confidence Interval [CI]: 95%: 44.63-52). The lowest and highest VAP prevention scores were attributed to frequency of humidifier changes (15.13%, CI: 95%: 11.35-18.92) and patient positioning (81.03%, CI: 95%: 75.43-86.64), respectively. The percentage of nurses’ knowledge about VAP prevention in Asian studies was higher than that in the European studies (54.71% versus 44.92%). Conclusion: The nurses obtained less than half of the VAP prevention total score. Regular training courses and reviewing VAP prevention guidelines can keep nurses' knowledge up to date.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trauma monthly
Trauma monthly EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Dimensions of the Anterior Column of the Acetabulum with Imaging Criteria in Patients with Surgical Acetabular Fractures Mortality Prediction in Multiple Trauma Patients Using GAP, RTS and NTS Models The effect of Pregabalin on morphine consumption, sleep, mood and ability to change position after colorectal cancer surgery Titanium Elastic Nailing System, An Effective Way Of Pediatric Forearm Fracture Management Diagnostic Salivary Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1