以过程为中心的法医群体风险评估模型:解释、案例和建立必要证据基础的初步计划

IF 0.7 4区 心理学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-02-14 DOI:10.1080/24732850.2021.2016118
A. P. Natoli, E. Gottfried, Abby L. Mulay
{"title":"以过程为中心的法医群体风险评估模型:解释、案例和建立必要证据基础的初步计划","authors":"A. P. Natoli, E. Gottfried, Abby L. Mulay","doi":"10.1080/24732850.2021.2016118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Comprehensive and efficacious risk assessment must not only use multiple methods of measurement, but evaluators should employ a scientifically-based, systematic approach for integrating multimethod assessment data. One scientifically-based approach for doing this is the process-focused (PF) model, which has the additional advantage of offering a framework for empirically testing examinee-specific hypotheses relevant to the estimation of risk, as well as interaction effects among risk factors via multimethod and serial assessment approaches. However, further research on the efficacy and clinical utility of the PF model is necessary if this approach is to be used in forensic evaluation, especially when considering the standards for expert testimony. After outlining the PF model as it may be applied to risk assessment, this paper presents a case example demonstrating the introduced assessment technique. The authors then discuss the potential benefits of using the PF model for risk assessment before concluding the paper with a justification for future research and suggestions for how to begin establishing the PF model’s efficacy and clinical utility in forensic evaluations.","PeriodicalId":15806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Process-Focused Model for Assessing Risk in Forensic Populations: Explanation, Case Example, and Initial Plans for Establishing the Necessary Evidence Base\",\"authors\":\"A. P. Natoli, E. Gottfried, Abby L. Mulay\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24732850.2021.2016118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Comprehensive and efficacious risk assessment must not only use multiple methods of measurement, but evaluators should employ a scientifically-based, systematic approach for integrating multimethod assessment data. One scientifically-based approach for doing this is the process-focused (PF) model, which has the additional advantage of offering a framework for empirically testing examinee-specific hypotheses relevant to the estimation of risk, as well as interaction effects among risk factors via multimethod and serial assessment approaches. However, further research on the efficacy and clinical utility of the PF model is necessary if this approach is to be used in forensic evaluation, especially when considering the standards for expert testimony. After outlining the PF model as it may be applied to risk assessment, this paper presents a case example demonstrating the introduced assessment technique. The authors then discuss the potential benefits of using the PF model for risk assessment before concluding the paper with a justification for future research and suggestions for how to begin establishing the PF model’s efficacy and clinical utility in forensic evaluations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2021.2016118\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2021.2016118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

全面有效的风险评估不仅需要使用多种测量方法,而且评估者应该采用一种科学的、系统的方法来整合多种方法的评估数据。一种基于科学的方法是以过程为中心(process-focused, PF)模型,它还有一个额外的优势,即提供了一个框架,可以对与风险估计相关的考生特定假设进行实证检验,以及通过多方法和系列评估方法评估风险因素之间的相互作用。然而,如果要将这种方法用于法医评估,特别是在考虑专家证词标准时,还需要进一步研究PF模型的疗效和临床实用性。在概述了可能应用于风险评估的PF模型之后,本文给出了一个案例来演示所引入的评估技术。作者随后讨论了使用PF模型进行风险评估的潜在好处,最后给出了未来研究的理由,并就如何开始建立PF模型在法医评估中的功效和临床应用提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Process-Focused Model for Assessing Risk in Forensic Populations: Explanation, Case Example, and Initial Plans for Establishing the Necessary Evidence Base
ABSTRACT Comprehensive and efficacious risk assessment must not only use multiple methods of measurement, but evaluators should employ a scientifically-based, systematic approach for integrating multimethod assessment data. One scientifically-based approach for doing this is the process-focused (PF) model, which has the additional advantage of offering a framework for empirically testing examinee-specific hypotheses relevant to the estimation of risk, as well as interaction effects among risk factors via multimethod and serial assessment approaches. However, further research on the efficacy and clinical utility of the PF model is necessary if this approach is to be used in forensic evaluation, especially when considering the standards for expert testimony. After outlining the PF model as it may be applied to risk assessment, this paper presents a case example demonstrating the introduced assessment technique. The authors then discuss the potential benefits of using the PF model for risk assessment before concluding the paper with a justification for future research and suggestions for how to begin establishing the PF model’s efficacy and clinical utility in forensic evaluations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Good Lives Model Among Students: The Role of Primary Goods and Self-Regulation in Achieving a Good Life An Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the Paraphilic Interests and Disorders Scale Use of the HCR-20 Version 3 with Women: A Narrative Synthesis Forensic Doctorate Trainee Views on an Expert by Experience (EbE)-Led Workshop: A Qualitative Exploration of Trainee Reflections Institutional Child Abuse: The Role of Disclosure, Risk, and Protective Factors in Understanding Trauma Responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1