在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,实地工作者对使用语音电话开展实地工作的思考

IF 0.9 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropology Southern Africa Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/23323256.2021.2002701
M. Serekoane, L. Marais, Michael Pienaar, C. Sharp, J. Cloete, Liezel Blomerus
{"title":"在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,实地工作者对使用语音电话开展实地工作的思考","authors":"M. Serekoane, L. Marais, Michael Pienaar, C. Sharp, J. Cloete, Liezel Blomerus","doi":"10.1080/23323256.2021.2002701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The declaration of Covid-19 as a global pandemic on 11 March, 2020, and the disaster management regulations implemented in reply to it had enormous ramifications on ethnographic fieldwork. This situation presented an opportunity to reconsider the methodology used in a research project on lived experiences of childhood health and well-being in Free State province, South Africa. This study explores the argument that technology can establish a virtual space that fieldworker and research participant can treat as “real.” It uses fieldwork diaries and insights to evaluate the benefits and disadvantages of telephonic virtual conversations as a replacement for conventional face-to-face fieldwork to access inaccessible fieldwork sites. It adopts a reflexive qualitative case-study approach to document the experiences of two fieldworkers moving from on-site fieldwork to telephone voice calls to conduct their research. By offering a reflexive account of these technology-mediated fieldwork experiences, this article proposes this methodology as possible alternative to documenting lived experience. Lessons from this experience can contribute to reviewing the traditional practice of ethnographic fieldwork and imagining alternative and complementary methodological possibilities.","PeriodicalId":54118,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology Southern Africa","volume":"24 1","pages":"161 - 174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fieldworker reflections on using telephone voice calls to conduct fieldwork amidst the Covid-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"M. Serekoane, L. Marais, Michael Pienaar, C. Sharp, J. Cloete, Liezel Blomerus\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23323256.2021.2002701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The declaration of Covid-19 as a global pandemic on 11 March, 2020, and the disaster management regulations implemented in reply to it had enormous ramifications on ethnographic fieldwork. This situation presented an opportunity to reconsider the methodology used in a research project on lived experiences of childhood health and well-being in Free State province, South Africa. This study explores the argument that technology can establish a virtual space that fieldworker and research participant can treat as “real.” It uses fieldwork diaries and insights to evaluate the benefits and disadvantages of telephonic virtual conversations as a replacement for conventional face-to-face fieldwork to access inaccessible fieldwork sites. It adopts a reflexive qualitative case-study approach to document the experiences of two fieldworkers moving from on-site fieldwork to telephone voice calls to conduct their research. By offering a reflexive account of these technology-mediated fieldwork experiences, this article proposes this methodology as possible alternative to documenting lived experience. Lessons from this experience can contribute to reviewing the traditional practice of ethnographic fieldwork and imagining alternative and complementary methodological possibilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropology Southern Africa\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"161 - 174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropology Southern Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23323256.2021.2002701\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23323256.2021.2002701","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

2020年3月11日宣布2019冠状病毒病为全球大流行,并为此实施了灾害管理条例,这对民族志实地工作产生了巨大影响。这种情况为重新考虑南非自由邦省儿童健康和福祉生活经验研究项目中使用的方法提供了机会。本研究探讨了技术可以建立一个虚拟空间的论点,实地工作者和研究参与者可以将其视为“真实的”。它使用实地工作日记和见解来评估电话虚拟对话作为传统面对面实地工作的替代品,以访问无法访问的实地工作地点的利弊。它采用反身性定性案例研究方法来记录两位实地工作者从现场实地工作到电话语音呼叫进行研究的经验。通过对这些以技术为媒介的实地工作经验进行反思,本文提出了这种方法作为记录生活经验的可能替代方法。这一经验的教训有助于回顾民族志田野调查的传统实践,并设想替代和补充的方法可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fieldworker reflections on using telephone voice calls to conduct fieldwork amidst the Covid-19 pandemic
The declaration of Covid-19 as a global pandemic on 11 March, 2020, and the disaster management regulations implemented in reply to it had enormous ramifications on ethnographic fieldwork. This situation presented an opportunity to reconsider the methodology used in a research project on lived experiences of childhood health and well-being in Free State province, South Africa. This study explores the argument that technology can establish a virtual space that fieldworker and research participant can treat as “real.” It uses fieldwork diaries and insights to evaluate the benefits and disadvantages of telephonic virtual conversations as a replacement for conventional face-to-face fieldwork to access inaccessible fieldwork sites. It adopts a reflexive qualitative case-study approach to document the experiences of two fieldworkers moving from on-site fieldwork to telephone voice calls to conduct their research. By offering a reflexive account of these technology-mediated fieldwork experiences, this article proposes this methodology as possible alternative to documenting lived experience. Lessons from this experience can contribute to reviewing the traditional practice of ethnographic fieldwork and imagining alternative and complementary methodological possibilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Multispecies encounters in conservation landscapes in Southern Africa. Killing tsetse and/or saving wildlife? A multispecies assemblage in colonial Zambia (1895-1959). Performing multispecies studies in Southern Africa: historical legacies, marginalised subjects, reflexive positionalities. Wildlife corridors in a Southern African conservation landscape: the political ecology of multispecies mobilities along the arteries of anthropogenic conservation. Anthropology Southern Africa statement on Israeli state violence in Gaza
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1