在上帝面前用内心的理由。从进化神学的角度看宗教经验

D. Veldsman
{"title":"在上帝面前用内心的理由。从进化神学的角度看宗教经验","authors":"D. Veldsman","doi":"10.5952/55-1-2-534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What does the affective-cognitive dimension of being human\n entails? Many contemporary scholars from theological (especially religious\n experience) perspectives as well as from evolutionary biological (especially\n neuroscientific) perspectives have made exciting inroads in the on-going\n anthropological discourses on this very dimension of being human. My article\n partially makes work of their respective contributions. For the former theological\n perspective I will utilize Pascal and Stoker. For the latter neuroscientific\n perspective I will concentrate on LeDoux and Damasio. I call my contribution an\n evolutionary-theological re-conceptualisation of religious experience for which I\n make use of Pascal’s famous words from his Pensees (1670) “The\n heart has its reasons which reason does not know” and “(i)t is the heart which\n experiences God and not the reason”. Therefore the title: With reasons of the heart\n before God. Such a formulation however immediately raises the question: Does such an\n emphasis on the “heart” re-introduce irrationality into the scientific scholarly\n dialogue? The answer is clear: Yes, it does. It is argued that it should be\n re-introduced constructively into contemporary science-theology discourses in order\n – on the one hand – to critically address the very accusation, and – on the other\n hand – to present us with a far richer, deeper understanding of personhood. From the\n constructive integration of the two perspectives, namely the theological and\n neuroscientific the words of Pascal is finally re-formulated from an\n evolutionary-theological perspective and qualified in which emotion is presented as\n the embodiment of the logic of survival.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"With reasons of the heart before God. On religious experience from an evolutionary-theological perspective\",\"authors\":\"D. Veldsman\",\"doi\":\"10.5952/55-1-2-534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What does the affective-cognitive dimension of being human\\n entails? Many contemporary scholars from theological (especially religious\\n experience) perspectives as well as from evolutionary biological (especially\\n neuroscientific) perspectives have made exciting inroads in the on-going\\n anthropological discourses on this very dimension of being human. My article\\n partially makes work of their respective contributions. For the former theological\\n perspective I will utilize Pascal and Stoker. For the latter neuroscientific\\n perspective I will concentrate on LeDoux and Damasio. I call my contribution an\\n evolutionary-theological re-conceptualisation of religious experience for which I\\n make use of Pascal’s famous words from his Pensees (1670) “The\\n heart has its reasons which reason does not know” and “(i)t is the heart which\\n experiences God and not the reason”. Therefore the title: With reasons of the heart\\n before God. Such a formulation however immediately raises the question: Does such an\\n emphasis on the “heart” re-introduce irrationality into the scientific scholarly\\n dialogue? The answer is clear: Yes, it does. It is argued that it should be\\n re-introduced constructively into contemporary science-theology discourses in order\\n – on the one hand – to critically address the very accusation, and – on the other\\n hand – to present us with a far richer, deeper understanding of personhood. From the\\n constructive integration of the two perspectives, namely the theological and\\n neuroscientific the words of Pascal is finally re-formulated from an\\n evolutionary-theological perspective and qualified in which emotion is presented as\\n the embodiment of the logic of survival.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5952/55-1-2-534\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5952/55-1-2-534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

作为人的情感认知维度需要什么?许多当代学者从神学(尤其是宗教经验)和进化生物学(尤其是神经科学)的角度出发,在人类这个维度的人类学论述中取得了令人兴奋的进展。我的文章部分地利用了他们各自的贡献。对于前一种神学观点,我将使用帕斯卡和斯托克。对于后一种神经科学观点,我将集中讨论勒杜和达马西奥。我把我的贡献称为对宗教经验的进化论神学重新概念化,为此我使用了帕斯卡在他的《冥想录》(1670)中的名言:“心有其理性所不知道的理由”和“(I)是心经历了上帝而不是理性”。所以题目是:在神面前凭心里的道理。然而,这样的表述立即提出了一个问题:这种对“心”的强调是否会在科学学术对话中重新引入非理性?答案很清楚:是的,确实如此。有人认为,它应该被建设性地重新引入当代科学神学的话语中,以便——一方面——批判性地解决这一指责,另一方面——向我们展示对人格更丰富、更深刻的理解。从神学和神经科学两种观点的建设性整合中,帕斯卡的话语最终从进化神学的角度被重新表述,并被限定为情感作为生存逻辑的体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
With reasons of the heart before God. On religious experience from an evolutionary-theological perspective
What does the affective-cognitive dimension of being human entails? Many contemporary scholars from theological (especially religious experience) perspectives as well as from evolutionary biological (especially neuroscientific) perspectives have made exciting inroads in the on-going anthropological discourses on this very dimension of being human. My article partially makes work of their respective contributions. For the former theological perspective I will utilize Pascal and Stoker. For the latter neuroscientific perspective I will concentrate on LeDoux and Damasio. I call my contribution an evolutionary-theological re-conceptualisation of religious experience for which I make use of Pascal’s famous words from his Pensees (1670) “The heart has its reasons which reason does not know” and “(i)t is the heart which experiences God and not the reason”. Therefore the title: With reasons of the heart before God. Such a formulation however immediately raises the question: Does such an emphasis on the “heart” re-introduce irrationality into the scientific scholarly dialogue? The answer is clear: Yes, it does. It is argued that it should be re-introduced constructively into contemporary science-theology discourses in order – on the one hand – to critically address the very accusation, and – on the other hand – to present us with a far richer, deeper understanding of personhood. From the constructive integration of the two perspectives, namely the theological and neuroscientific the words of Pascal is finally re-formulated from an evolutionary-theological perspective and qualified in which emotion is presented as the embodiment of the logic of survival.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Power games: Using Foucault to shed light on the inherent power dynamics of intercultural Bible study groups. Discussion of a qualitative research project The rising prominence of John Owen: A research article of “The Ashgate Research Companion to John Owen’s Theology” Alle kaarte op die preek “Rise up and walk” : tracing the trajectory of the Carnegie discourse and plotting a way forward The relevance of Galatians 5:16-26 in the modern "spiritual intelligence" debate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1