中草药和中草药制剂中元素毒物测定方法的开发和验证

V. M. Shchukin, N. E. Kuz’mina, Yu. N. Shvetsova, A. I. Luttseva
{"title":"中草药和中草药制剂中元素毒物测定方法的开发和验证","authors":"V. M. Shchukin, N. E. Kuz’mina, Yu. N. Shvetsova, A. I. Luttseva","doi":"10.30895/1991-2919-2022-12-1-65-78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When the approach to quality control of herbal substances (HSs) and herbal medicinal products (HMPs) changed from determination of the total content of heavy metals by calorimetry to selective determination by spectrometric techniques, many manufacturers of such products failed to meet the new requirements in their registration dossiers. Test procedures submitted by manufacturers often need to be clarified, and validation protocols often lack data.The aim of the study was to provide recommendations to HS and HMP manufacturers on the choice of test methods, materials, reagents, methods of organic matrix mineralisation, and main validation parameters, as well as recommendations on validation of the procedure for elemental toxicants determination, and preparation of the “Heavy metals and arsenic” part of the regulatory submission.Materials and methods: the study included analysis and systematisation of scientific literature, requirements of the Russian and foreign pharmacopoeias, guidelines, manuals on instrumental methods of analysis, and first-hand experience in elemental analysis of various types of HSs and HMPs.Results: the authors formulated recommendations on the choice of sample mineralisation conditions for quantification of elemental impurities in biological products, and substantiated requirements for the reagents, materials, and equipment. The paper compares different methods of elemental analysis. It was demonstrated that the main mistakes made by manufacturers stem from disregard to the organic matrix effect on the measurement results and lack of agreement between the impurity concentration being determined and the range of the calibration curve used. The paper gives acceptance criteria for validation parameters of test procedures for heavy metals and arsenic determination in HSs and HMPs.Conclusions: it is not correct to use reference standards containing heavy metals as inorganic salts not bound to organic compounds, for HS and HMP analysis. The criteria given in the European Pharmacopoeia and the United State Pharmacopoeia can be used for a number of validation parameters, when they are not included in the Russian Pharmacopoeia.","PeriodicalId":22286,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of Procedures for Determination of Elemental Toxicants in Herbal Substances and Herbal Medicinal Products\",\"authors\":\"V. M. Shchukin, N. E. Kuz’mina, Yu. N. Shvetsova, A. I. Luttseva\",\"doi\":\"10.30895/1991-2919-2022-12-1-65-78\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When the approach to quality control of herbal substances (HSs) and herbal medicinal products (HMPs) changed from determination of the total content of heavy metals by calorimetry to selective determination by spectrometric techniques, many manufacturers of such products failed to meet the new requirements in their registration dossiers. Test procedures submitted by manufacturers often need to be clarified, and validation protocols often lack data.The aim of the study was to provide recommendations to HS and HMP manufacturers on the choice of test methods, materials, reagents, methods of organic matrix mineralisation, and main validation parameters, as well as recommendations on validation of the procedure for elemental toxicants determination, and preparation of the “Heavy metals and arsenic” part of the regulatory submission.Materials and methods: the study included analysis and systematisation of scientific literature, requirements of the Russian and foreign pharmacopoeias, guidelines, manuals on instrumental methods of analysis, and first-hand experience in elemental analysis of various types of HSs and HMPs.Results: the authors formulated recommendations on the choice of sample mineralisation conditions for quantification of elemental impurities in biological products, and substantiated requirements for the reagents, materials, and equipment. The paper compares different methods of elemental analysis. It was demonstrated that the main mistakes made by manufacturers stem from disregard to the organic matrix effect on the measurement results and lack of agreement between the impurity concentration being determined and the range of the calibration curve used. The paper gives acceptance criteria for validation parameters of test procedures for heavy metals and arsenic determination in HSs and HMPs.Conclusions: it is not correct to use reference standards containing heavy metals as inorganic salts not bound to organic compounds, for HS and HMP analysis. The criteria given in the European Pharmacopoeia and the United State Pharmacopoeia can be used for a number of validation parameters, when they are not included in the Russian Pharmacopoeia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2022-12-1-65-78\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2022-12-1-65-78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当草药物质(hs)和草药产品(hmp)的质量控制方法从用量热法测定重金属总含量改为用光谱法选择性测定时,许多此类产品的制造商未能满足其注册档案中的新要求。制造商提交的测试程序通常需要澄清,验证方案通常缺乏数据。该研究的目的是为HS和HMP制造商提供关于测试方法、材料、试剂、有机基质矿化方法和主要验证参数选择的建议,以及关于元素毒物测定程序验证的建议,以及监管提交的“重金属和砷”部分的准备。材料和方法:研究包括科学文献的分析和系统化,俄罗斯和外国药典的要求,指南,仪器分析方法手册,以及各种类型的HSs和hmp元素分析的第一手经验。结果:作者对生物制品中元素杂质定量的样品矿化条件的选择提出了建议,并证实了试剂、材料和设备的要求。本文比较了不同的元素分析方法。结果表明,生产厂家所犯的主要错误是忽视了有机基质对测量结果的影响,以及所测定的杂质浓度与所用校准曲线的范围不一致。本文给出了HSs和hmp中重金属和砷测定方法验证参数的可接受标准。结论:将重金属作为不与有机物结合的无机盐使用参考标准进行HS和HMP分析是不正确的。欧洲药典和美国药典中给出的标准可用于许多验证参数,当它们未包括在俄罗斯药典中时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and Validation of Procedures for Determination of Elemental Toxicants in Herbal Substances and Herbal Medicinal Products
When the approach to quality control of herbal substances (HSs) and herbal medicinal products (HMPs) changed from determination of the total content of heavy metals by calorimetry to selective determination by spectrometric techniques, many manufacturers of such products failed to meet the new requirements in their registration dossiers. Test procedures submitted by manufacturers often need to be clarified, and validation protocols often lack data.The aim of the study was to provide recommendations to HS and HMP manufacturers on the choice of test methods, materials, reagents, methods of organic matrix mineralisation, and main validation parameters, as well as recommendations on validation of the procedure for elemental toxicants determination, and preparation of the “Heavy metals and arsenic” part of the regulatory submission.Materials and methods: the study included analysis and systematisation of scientific literature, requirements of the Russian and foreign pharmacopoeias, guidelines, manuals on instrumental methods of analysis, and first-hand experience in elemental analysis of various types of HSs and HMPs.Results: the authors formulated recommendations on the choice of sample mineralisation conditions for quantification of elemental impurities in biological products, and substantiated requirements for the reagents, materials, and equipment. The paper compares different methods of elemental analysis. It was demonstrated that the main mistakes made by manufacturers stem from disregard to the organic matrix effect on the measurement results and lack of agreement between the impurity concentration being determined and the range of the calibration curve used. The paper gives acceptance criteria for validation parameters of test procedures for heavy metals and arsenic determination in HSs and HMPs.Conclusions: it is not correct to use reference standards containing heavy metals as inorganic salts not bound to organic compounds, for HS and HMP analysis. The criteria given in the European Pharmacopoeia and the United State Pharmacopoeia can be used for a number of validation parameters, when they are not included in the Russian Pharmacopoeia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the Medicinal Products for Human Use Authorised in the Russian Federation Diffusion-Ordered NMR Spectroscopy Application for Analysis of Polysaccharides Determination of Heavy Metals, Arsenic, and Aluminum Content in Pumpkin Seed Herbal Substance and Native Products, by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry The Use of Spectroscopic Methods for Structural Elucidation of Individual Secondary Metabolites Isolated from the Aerial Parts of Corydalis bracteata NMR as Used in the Russian and Foreign Pharmacopoeias for Quality Control of Medicinal Products
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1