精神科医生作为狱卒

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology Pub Date : 1999-12-01 DOI:10.1080/09585189908402157
M. Cavadino
{"title":"精神科医生作为狱卒","authors":"M. Cavadino","doi":"10.1080/09585189908402157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Psychiatrists have a number of ‘gaoler roles’: that is, they are involved in the detention and compulsory treatment of patients for the protection of others rather than for the good of the patient. Psychiatrists often feel uneasy about these roles, and may even deny that they exercise them. In principle—an argument based on human rights theory—it can be justifiable for the state to ‘gaol’ in appropriate cases. One line of argument contends that, none the less, this should not be the job of doctors. This argument is rejected in principle. Moreover, in practice psychiatrists will inevitably take other people's interests into account whether consciously or not, and political reality dictates that psychiatrists cannot escape their gaoler function.","PeriodicalId":47524,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The psychiatrist as gaoler\",\"authors\":\"M. Cavadino\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09585189908402157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Psychiatrists have a number of ‘gaoler roles’: that is, they are involved in the detention and compulsory treatment of patients for the protection of others rather than for the good of the patient. Psychiatrists often feel uneasy about these roles, and may even deny that they exercise them. In principle—an argument based on human rights theory—it can be justifiable for the state to ‘gaol’ in appropriate cases. One line of argument contends that, none the less, this should not be the job of doctors. This argument is rejected in principle. Moreover, in practice psychiatrists will inevitably take other people's interests into account whether consciously or not, and political reality dictates that psychiatrists cannot escape their gaoler function.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09585189908402157\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09585189908402157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

精神科医生扮演着许多“狱吏的角色”:也就是说,他们参与对病人的拘留和强制治疗是为了保护他人,而不是为了病人的利益。精神科医生经常对这些角色感到不安,甚至可能否认他们行使这些角色。原则上——一个基于人权理论的论点——国家在适当的情况下“监禁”是合理的。一种观点认为,尽管如此,这不应该是医生的工作。这一论点在原则上被否定了。此外,在实践中,精神科医生不可避免地会有意无意地考虑到他人的利益,而政治现实决定了精神科医生无法逃避他们的狱吏职能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The psychiatrist as gaoler
Abstract Psychiatrists have a number of ‘gaoler roles’: that is, they are involved in the detention and compulsory treatment of patients for the protection of others rather than for the good of the patient. Psychiatrists often feel uneasy about these roles, and may even deny that they exercise them. In principle—an argument based on human rights theory—it can be justifiable for the state to ‘gaol’ in appropriate cases. One line of argument contends that, none the less, this should not be the job of doctors. This argument is rejected in principle. Moreover, in practice psychiatrists will inevitably take other people's interests into account whether consciously or not, and political reality dictates that psychiatrists cannot escape their gaoler function.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
An assessment of interventions following moderate and high scores on the dynamic appraisal of situational aggression risk assessment tool in a forensic mental health unit Do forensic mental health services have an ethical duty towards victims of mentally disordered offenders? Difficulties experienced by Turkish legal support officers in forensic interviews with individuals with autism and/or intellectual disabilities First steps towards a core outcome Set for measuring aggressive behavior in prisoners: a systematic review of current methods Prevalence of anxiety, depression, and PTSD in exonerees: a brief report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1