复式记账法的起源:假设与事实

L. Kulikova
{"title":"复式记账法的起源:假设与事实","authors":"L. Kulikova","doi":"10.24891/ia.26.7.812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subject. This article examines various historical versions of the origin and formation of double-entry bookkeeping for the period from the 13th century through the 15th century.\nObjectives. The article aims to consider various hypotheses and assumptions about the origin of double-entry bookkeeping, and identify the major points in the development of accounting using double-entry bookkeeping, taking into account specific historical conditions based on the application of the principle of historicism.\nMethods. For the study, I used analysis and synthesis, observation, comparison, and generalization. The works of well-known scientists, both Russian and foreign, in the field of the history of accounting served as the methodological basis for the study.\nResults. The article emphasizes the exceptional influence of Luca Pacioli's Treatise on the Accounts and Records (1494) on the writings of many authors on accountancy. It shows that before Luca Pacioli's work was presented, double-entry bookkeeping had been used in the practice of Italian merchants and bankers, and it gives a chronology of the appearance of accounting books and archival materials testifying to the birth of Italian double-entry bookkeeping. The article also describes the main characteristics of the accounting books of Venetian, Florentine and Genoese companies in medieval Italy, confirming the use of double-entry techniques.\nConclusions and Relevance. The article concludes about the date and place of origin of double-entry bookkeeping. The study substantiates the position that in the process of researching the origin of double-entry bookkeeping, it is advisable to use authentic literary sources and archival materials of past periods.","PeriodicalId":100047,"journal":{"name":"Advances in International Accounting","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The origin of double-entry bookkeeping: Hypotheses and facts\",\"authors\":\"L. Kulikova\",\"doi\":\"10.24891/ia.26.7.812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Subject. This article examines various historical versions of the origin and formation of double-entry bookkeeping for the period from the 13th century through the 15th century.\\nObjectives. The article aims to consider various hypotheses and assumptions about the origin of double-entry bookkeeping, and identify the major points in the development of accounting using double-entry bookkeeping, taking into account specific historical conditions based on the application of the principle of historicism.\\nMethods. For the study, I used analysis and synthesis, observation, comparison, and generalization. The works of well-known scientists, both Russian and foreign, in the field of the history of accounting served as the methodological basis for the study.\\nResults. The article emphasizes the exceptional influence of Luca Pacioli's Treatise on the Accounts and Records (1494) on the writings of many authors on accountancy. It shows that before Luca Pacioli's work was presented, double-entry bookkeeping had been used in the practice of Italian merchants and bankers, and it gives a chronology of the appearance of accounting books and archival materials testifying to the birth of Italian double-entry bookkeeping. The article also describes the main characteristics of the accounting books of Venetian, Florentine and Genoese companies in medieval Italy, confirming the use of double-entry techniques.\\nConclusions and Relevance. The article concludes about the date and place of origin of double-entry bookkeeping. The study substantiates the position that in the process of researching the origin of double-entry bookkeeping, it is advisable to use authentic literary sources and archival materials of past periods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in International Accounting\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in International Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24891/ia.26.7.812\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in International Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24891/ia.26.7.812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主题。本文考察了从13世纪到15世纪期间关于复式记账法的起源和形成的各种历史版本。本文的目的是在运用历史决定论原则的基础上,考虑到具体的历史条件,考虑到有关复式记账法起源的各种假设和假设,并确定复式记账法会计发展的要点。在研究中,我采用了分析综合、观察、比较、概括的方法。在会计史领域,俄罗斯和国外知名科学家的著作为本研究提供了方法论基础。这篇文章强调了卢卡·帕乔利的《帐目与记录专著》(1494)对许多关于会计的作者的著作的特殊影响。它表明,在Luca Pacioli的工作提出之前,复式记账法已经在意大利商人和银行家的实践中使用,它给出了会计账簿和档案材料出现的年表,证明了意大利复式记账法的诞生。文章还描述了中世纪意大利威尼斯、佛罗伦萨和热那亚公司会计账簿的主要特点,证实了复式记帐技术的使用。结论和相关性。文章对复式记账法的起源时间和地点进行了总结。在研究复式记账法起源的过程中,应充分利用真实的文献资料和历代档案资料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The origin of double-entry bookkeeping: Hypotheses and facts
Subject. This article examines various historical versions of the origin and formation of double-entry bookkeeping for the period from the 13th century through the 15th century. Objectives. The article aims to consider various hypotheses and assumptions about the origin of double-entry bookkeeping, and identify the major points in the development of accounting using double-entry bookkeeping, taking into account specific historical conditions based on the application of the principle of historicism. Methods. For the study, I used analysis and synthesis, observation, comparison, and generalization. The works of well-known scientists, both Russian and foreign, in the field of the history of accounting served as the methodological basis for the study. Results. The article emphasizes the exceptional influence of Luca Pacioli's Treatise on the Accounts and Records (1494) on the writings of many authors on accountancy. It shows that before Luca Pacioli's work was presented, double-entry bookkeeping had been used in the practice of Italian merchants and bankers, and it gives a chronology of the appearance of accounting books and archival materials testifying to the birth of Italian double-entry bookkeeping. The article also describes the main characteristics of the accounting books of Venetian, Florentine and Genoese companies in medieval Italy, confirming the use of double-entry techniques. Conclusions and Relevance. The article concludes about the date and place of origin of double-entry bookkeeping. The study substantiates the position that in the process of researching the origin of double-entry bookkeeping, it is advisable to use authentic literary sources and archival materials of past periods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intangible assets as an object of accounting expertise Integrated reporting of an educational institution: Contemporary challenges Stages of development and convergence of bookkeeping and tax accounting in Turkey Conceptual framework for reporting: The impact of changes on the theory and methodology of accounting and reporting Federal Accounting Standard FSBU 28/2023 – Taking Inventory: An analysis of the structure and content
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1