作者的精神退稿权及其合理限制或合同放弃

Ingrida Veiksa
{"title":"作者的精神退稿权及其合理限制或合同放弃","authors":"Ingrida Veiksa","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Copyright protects original works of authorship by granting the author economic rights, which give the author an exclusive right of economic exploitation, and moral rights, which protect noneconomic interests of the author. Moral rights are not considered property, but an aspect of the author's personality. The aim of this study is to find a solution how to include one of the author's moral rights—the right of withdrawal—in the national legal acts, so that it meets the interests of both the author himself and the user of the work. The research question is: how much should it be necessary to limit the right of withdrawal so that neither the transferee of the economic rights nor other coauthors of the work suffer from its excessive use? To find an answer to the research question, international and national legal norms of various countries were studied, the materials of international conferences were analyzed, as well as the information available on the Internet about the origin, use, and development of moral rights were taken into account. There is a wide diversity of opinion on the application of right of withdrawal, as well as great differences in the laws of individual countries. Although the laws of Common Law countries include mandatory moral rights (according to the Berne Convention), the right of withdrawal in its classical form is not provided for in any of the analyzed countries. In Civil Law countries are different attitudes to withdrawal rights. Some Civil Law countries have and some have not included these rights in national copyright law. The right of withdrawal can be included in the catalog of moral rights of national copyright laws, but it cannot be an unlimited right. Certain limitations or exceptions must be established for specific types of work or specific situations of use. It should also be possible for the author to contractually transfer or waive certain moral rights in specific situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"26 3","pages":"509-517"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The author's moral right of withdrawal and its reasonable restriction or contractual waive\",\"authors\":\"Ingrida Veiksa\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jwip.12284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Copyright protects original works of authorship by granting the author economic rights, which give the author an exclusive right of economic exploitation, and moral rights, which protect noneconomic interests of the author. Moral rights are not considered property, but an aspect of the author's personality. The aim of this study is to find a solution how to include one of the author's moral rights—the right of withdrawal—in the national legal acts, so that it meets the interests of both the author himself and the user of the work. The research question is: how much should it be necessary to limit the right of withdrawal so that neither the transferee of the economic rights nor other coauthors of the work suffer from its excessive use? To find an answer to the research question, international and national legal norms of various countries were studied, the materials of international conferences were analyzed, as well as the information available on the Internet about the origin, use, and development of moral rights were taken into account. There is a wide diversity of opinion on the application of right of withdrawal, as well as great differences in the laws of individual countries. Although the laws of Common Law countries include mandatory moral rights (according to the Berne Convention), the right of withdrawal in its classical form is not provided for in any of the analyzed countries. In Civil Law countries are different attitudes to withdrawal rights. Some Civil Law countries have and some have not included these rights in national copyright law. The right of withdrawal can be included in the catalog of moral rights of national copyright laws, but it cannot be an unlimited right. Certain limitations or exceptions must be established for specific types of work or specific situations of use. It should also be possible for the author to contractually transfer or waive certain moral rights in specific situations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of World Intellectual Property\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"509-517\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of World Intellectual Property\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwip.12284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwip.12284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

版权通过赋予作者经济权利和精神权利来保护原创作品,经济权利赋予作者经济利用的专有权,精神权利保护作者的非经济利益。精神权利不被认为是财产,而是作者人格的一个方面。本文旨在探讨如何将作者的一项精神权利——撤回权纳入国家法律行为中,使其符合作者本人和作品使用人的利益。研究的问题是:有必要在多大程度上限制撤回权,以使经济权利的受让人和作品的其他共同作者都不会因过度使用而遭受损失?为了找到研究问题的答案,研究了各国的国际和国家法律规范,分析了国际会议的资料,并考虑了互联网上关于精神权利的起源、使用和发展的信息。对于回避权的适用,存在着广泛的意见分歧,各国法律也存在较大差异。尽管英美法系国家的法律包括强制性的精神权利(根据《伯尔尼公约》),但在所分析的任何国家都没有规定其经典形式的回避权。大陆法系国家对回避权的态度各不相同。一些大陆法系国家已经或尚未将这些权利纳入国家著作权法。撤回权可以列入国家著作权法的精神权利目录,但不能是一项无限制的权利。必须为特定类型的工作或特定的使用情况制定某些限制或例外。在特定情况下,作者也可以通过合同转让或放弃某些精神权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The author's moral right of withdrawal and its reasonable restriction or contractual waive

Copyright protects original works of authorship by granting the author economic rights, which give the author an exclusive right of economic exploitation, and moral rights, which protect noneconomic interests of the author. Moral rights are not considered property, but an aspect of the author's personality. The aim of this study is to find a solution how to include one of the author's moral rights—the right of withdrawal—in the national legal acts, so that it meets the interests of both the author himself and the user of the work. The research question is: how much should it be necessary to limit the right of withdrawal so that neither the transferee of the economic rights nor other coauthors of the work suffer from its excessive use? To find an answer to the research question, international and national legal norms of various countries were studied, the materials of international conferences were analyzed, as well as the information available on the Internet about the origin, use, and development of moral rights were taken into account. There is a wide diversity of opinion on the application of right of withdrawal, as well as great differences in the laws of individual countries. Although the laws of Common Law countries include mandatory moral rights (according to the Berne Convention), the right of withdrawal in its classical form is not provided for in any of the analyzed countries. In Civil Law countries are different attitudes to withdrawal rights. Some Civil Law countries have and some have not included these rights in national copyright law. The right of withdrawal can be included in the catalog of moral rights of national copyright laws, but it cannot be an unlimited right. Certain limitations or exceptions must be established for specific types of work or specific situations of use. It should also be possible for the author to contractually transfer or waive certain moral rights in specific situations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information The flexibilization of intellectual property rights in cases of health crises: A case study of Brazil in the face of the AIDS and COVID sanitary crises Factors influencing the prioritisation of access to medicines in trade-related intellectual property policymaking in Thailand Law libraries, copyright and digital lending
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1