基于模型的基于计数保守的离线强化学习

Byeongchang Kim, Min-hwan Oh
{"title":"基于模型的基于计数保守的离线强化学习","authors":"Byeongchang Kim, Min-hwan Oh","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2307.11352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we propose a model-based offline reinforcement learning method that integrates count-based conservatism, named $\\texttt{Count-MORL}$. Our method utilizes the count estimates of state-action pairs to quantify model estimation error, marking the first algorithm of demonstrating the efficacy of count-based conservatism in model-based offline deep RL to the best of our knowledge. For our proposed method, we first show that the estimation error is inversely proportional to the frequency of state-action pairs. Secondly, we demonstrate that the learned policy under the count-based conservative model offers near-optimality performance guarantees. Through extensive numerical experiments, we validate that $\\texttt{Count-MORL}$ with hash code implementation significantly outperforms existing offline RL algorithms on the D4RL benchmark datasets. The code is accessible at $\\href{https://github.com/oh-lab/Count-MORL}{https://github.com/oh-lab/Count-MORL}$.","PeriodicalId":74529,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Machine Learning. International Conference on Machine Learning","volume":"38 1","pages":"16728-16746"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model-based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Count-based Conservatism\",\"authors\":\"Byeongchang Kim, Min-hwan Oh\",\"doi\":\"10.48550/arXiv.2307.11352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we propose a model-based offline reinforcement learning method that integrates count-based conservatism, named $\\\\texttt{Count-MORL}$. Our method utilizes the count estimates of state-action pairs to quantify model estimation error, marking the first algorithm of demonstrating the efficacy of count-based conservatism in model-based offline deep RL to the best of our knowledge. For our proposed method, we first show that the estimation error is inversely proportional to the frequency of state-action pairs. Secondly, we demonstrate that the learned policy under the count-based conservative model offers near-optimality performance guarantees. Through extensive numerical experiments, we validate that $\\\\texttt{Count-MORL}$ with hash code implementation significantly outperforms existing offline RL algorithms on the D4RL benchmark datasets. The code is accessible at $\\\\href{https://github.com/oh-lab/Count-MORL}{https://github.com/oh-lab/Count-MORL}$.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Machine Learning. International Conference on Machine Learning\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"16728-16746\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Machine Learning. International Conference on Machine Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.11352\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Machine Learning. International Conference on Machine Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.11352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了一种基于模型的离线强化学习方法,该方法集成了基于计数的保守性,命名为$\texttt{Count-MORL}$。我们的方法利用状态-动作对的计数估计来量化模型估计误差,这标志着据我们所知,第一个在基于模型的离线深度强化学习中证明基于计数的保守性有效性的算法。对于我们提出的方法,我们首先证明了估计误差与状态-动作对的频率成反比。其次,我们证明了在基于计数的保守模型下学习的策略提供了接近最优的性能保证。通过大量的数值实验,我们验证了$\texttt{Count-MORL}$与哈希码实现在D4RL基准数据集上显著优于现有的离线RL算法。代码可在$\href{https://github.com/oh-lab/Count-MORL}{https://github.com/oh-lab/Count-MORL}$上访问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Model-based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Count-based Conservatism
In this paper, we propose a model-based offline reinforcement learning method that integrates count-based conservatism, named $\texttt{Count-MORL}$. Our method utilizes the count estimates of state-action pairs to quantify model estimation error, marking the first algorithm of demonstrating the efficacy of count-based conservatism in model-based offline deep RL to the best of our knowledge. For our proposed method, we first show that the estimation error is inversely proportional to the frequency of state-action pairs. Secondly, we demonstrate that the learned policy under the count-based conservative model offers near-optimality performance guarantees. Through extensive numerical experiments, we validate that $\texttt{Count-MORL}$ with hash code implementation significantly outperforms existing offline RL algorithms on the D4RL benchmark datasets. The code is accessible at $\href{https://github.com/oh-lab/Count-MORL}{https://github.com/oh-lab/Count-MORL}$.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differential Privacy, Linguistic Fairness, and Training Data Influence: Impossibility and Possibility Theorems for Multilingual Language Models Ske2Grid: Skeleton-to-Grid Representation Learning for Action Recognition Probabilistic Imputation for Time-series Classification with Missing Data Decoding Layer Saliency in Language Transformers Do You Remember? Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting for Fake Audio Detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1