肩关节镜手术后肩关节置换术的翻修率增加。

Q4 Psychology Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-17 DOI:10.1177/17585732231176269
Sribava Sharma, Peter Z Berger, Safa C Fassihi, Alex Gu, Monica Stadecker, Omar H Tarawneh, Joshua C Campbell, Matthew J Best, Ed G McFarland, Uma Srikumaran
{"title":"肩关节镜手术后肩关节置换术的翻修率增加。","authors":"Sribava Sharma, Peter Z Berger, Safa C Fassihi, Alex Gu, Monica Stadecker, Omar H Tarawneh, Joshua C Campbell, Matthew J Best, Ed G McFarland, Uma Srikumaran","doi":"10.1177/17585732231176269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse TSA (rTSA) are successful treatments for end-stage shoulder arthritis. However, it is unknown whether prior arthroscopy is associated with an increased risk for revision surgery. This study investigates if undergoing a shoulder arthroscopy in the year prior to primary arthroplasty increases risk of revision surgery within 2 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent TSA or rTSA between 2005 and 2017 were identified in a natinal claims database and stratified into two cohorts: (1) individuals with a history of shoulder arthroscopy prior to arthroplasty and (2) individuals with no documented history of arthroscopy prior to arthroplasty. These cohorts were propensity matched based on demographic and comorbidity factors. Univariate analysis was used to determine differences in revision rates, aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, and infection between the two cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hundred and eighty-eight patients were successfully matched from the two cohorts. Revision surgery (3.4% vs. 1.4%, p  =  0.001) and aseptic loosening (2.2% vs. 0.8% p  =  0.021) were significantly more common in the arthroscopy cohort. Periprosthetic fracture and periprosthetic infection were not found to be significantly different between cohorts.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Shoulder arthroscopy in the year prior to shoulder arthroplasty is associated with an increased risk of complications, including revision and aseptic loosening.</p>","PeriodicalId":37796,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research","volume":"35 1","pages":"501-506"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increased revision rates in shoulder arthroplasty following shoulder arthroscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Sribava Sharma, Peter Z Berger, Safa C Fassihi, Alex Gu, Monica Stadecker, Omar H Tarawneh, Joshua C Campbell, Matthew J Best, Ed G McFarland, Uma Srikumaran\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17585732231176269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse TSA (rTSA) are successful treatments for end-stage shoulder arthritis. However, it is unknown whether prior arthroscopy is associated with an increased risk for revision surgery. This study investigates if undergoing a shoulder arthroscopy in the year prior to primary arthroplasty increases risk of revision surgery within 2 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent TSA or rTSA between 2005 and 2017 were identified in a natinal claims database and stratified into two cohorts: (1) individuals with a history of shoulder arthroscopy prior to arthroplasty and (2) individuals with no documented history of arthroscopy prior to arthroplasty. These cohorts were propensity matched based on demographic and comorbidity factors. Univariate analysis was used to determine differences in revision rates, aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, and infection between the two cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hundred and eighty-eight patients were successfully matched from the two cohorts. Revision surgery (3.4% vs. 1.4%, p  =  0.001) and aseptic loosening (2.2% vs. 0.8% p  =  0.021) were significantly more common in the arthroscopy cohort. Periprosthetic fracture and periprosthetic infection were not found to be significantly different between cohorts.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Shoulder arthroscopy in the year prior to shoulder arthroplasty is associated with an increased risk of complications, including revision and aseptic loosening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"501-506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528832/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732231176269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732231176269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:全肩关节置换术(TSA)和反向全肩关节置换术(rTSA)是治疗终末期肩关节炎的成功疗法。然而,目前尚不清楚接受过关节镜手术是否会增加翻修手术的风险。本研究探讨了在初次关节置换术前一年接受肩关节镜检查是否会增加两年内翻修手术的风险:从国家索赔数据库中识别出2005年至2017年间接受过TSA或rTSA的患者,并将其分为两个队列:(1)关节置换术前有肩关节镜检查史的患者;(2)关节置换术前无关节镜检查史记录的患者。这些组群根据人口统计学和合并症因素进行了倾向匹配。采用单变量分析确定两组患者在翻修率、无菌性松动、假体周围骨折和感染方面的差异:结果:两组共有 78 名患者成功配对。在关节镜组中,翻修手术(3.4% 对 1.4%,P = 0.001)和无菌性松动(2.2% 对 0.8%,P = 0.021)明显更常见。假体周围骨折和假体周围感染在不同组别中无明显差异:讨论:肩关节置换术前一年进行肩关节镜检查会增加并发症风险,包括翻修和无菌性松动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Increased revision rates in shoulder arthroplasty following shoulder arthroscopy.

Introduction: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse TSA (rTSA) are successful treatments for end-stage shoulder arthritis. However, it is unknown whether prior arthroscopy is associated with an increased risk for revision surgery. This study investigates if undergoing a shoulder arthroscopy in the year prior to primary arthroplasty increases risk of revision surgery within 2 years.

Methods: Patients who underwent TSA or rTSA between 2005 and 2017 were identified in a natinal claims database and stratified into two cohorts: (1) individuals with a history of shoulder arthroscopy prior to arthroplasty and (2) individuals with no documented history of arthroscopy prior to arthroplasty. These cohorts were propensity matched based on demographic and comorbidity factors. Univariate analysis was used to determine differences in revision rates, aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, and infection between the two cohorts.

Results: Seven hundred and eighty-eight patients were successfully matched from the two cohorts. Revision surgery (3.4% vs. 1.4%, p  =  0.001) and aseptic loosening (2.2% vs. 0.8% p  =  0.021) were significantly more common in the arthroscopy cohort. Periprosthetic fracture and periprosthetic infection were not found to be significantly different between cohorts.

Discussion: Shoulder arthroscopy in the year prior to shoulder arthroplasty is associated with an increased risk of complications, including revision and aseptic loosening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research
Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research (PJPR) is published biannually by the National Institute of Psychology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Pakistan. Its first issue was published in Summer, 1986. Since then two issues, one in summer and the other in winter, have been appearing every year. The Journal provides an outlet for fully documented researches addressing educational, social, developmental, and other areas of Psychology. Preference is given to empirical articles, which deal with the application of psychological knowledge in understanding the problems of national and international importance. The Journal welcomes contributions from all corners. However, participation from the developing countries is eagerly sought in view of its under-representation in research journals published in the West. The PJPR maintains an international editorial board of Consulting Editors belonging to different countries, with expertise in a large number of areas. It employs a double-blind reviewing process i.e., the authors are not identified to reviewers and reviewers are not made known to authors. The contents of PJPR are being abstracted by the Proquest, and in PsycInfo. PJPR is included in the List of Social Sciences Journals recognized by Higher Education Commission, Pakistan.
期刊最新文献
Increased revision rates in shoulder arthroplasty following shoulder arthroscopy. Gratitude Linking the Relationship between Psychological Well-being and Negative Life Events in the Times of Covid-19 within University Students Translation and Adaptation of Short Dark Tetrad (SD4) Development and Validation of Scale of Psychosocial Issues for Patients With Migraine Paranoid Tendencies Scale: Development and Establishment of Psychometric Properties in Young Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1