事实父母和非父母子女抚养令

Jeffrey A. Parness, M. Timko
{"title":"事实父母和非父母子女抚养令","authors":"Jeffrey A. Parness, M. Timko","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/rpx7w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For ever so long U.S. state laws have recognized the federal constitutional right to “care, custody and control” of a child vested in the opposite sex married couple who bore the child of sex or in any formal adoptive parent. More recently this parental right has also been recognized for the opposite sex unmarried couple who bore the child of sex. And even more recently, U.S. state laws have recognized this parental right for some who did not engage in the sex leading to birth and for some where the children were born without sex. State laws have also increasingly limited this childcare right by allowing nonparents to secure court-ordered childcare over the objections of established legal parents, whether by newly recognizing these nonparents as de facto parents or as third parties with childcare standing. While state childcare laws have evolved significantly as family structures, the availability of reliable and inexpensive genetic testing, and assisted reproduction techniques have changed, the laws on parental and nonparental child support have not changed much. This article is the first to explore actual and potential child support arising from the new childcare opportunities for both de facto parents and nonparents.","PeriodicalId":80193,"journal":{"name":"The American University law review","volume":"69 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"De Facto Parent and Nonparent Child Support Orders\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey A. Parness, M. Timko\",\"doi\":\"10.31228/osf.io/rpx7w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For ever so long U.S. state laws have recognized the federal constitutional right to “care, custody and control” of a child vested in the opposite sex married couple who bore the child of sex or in any formal adoptive parent. More recently this parental right has also been recognized for the opposite sex unmarried couple who bore the child of sex. And even more recently, U.S. state laws have recognized this parental right for some who did not engage in the sex leading to birth and for some where the children were born without sex. State laws have also increasingly limited this childcare right by allowing nonparents to secure court-ordered childcare over the objections of established legal parents, whether by newly recognizing these nonparents as de facto parents or as third parties with childcare standing. While state childcare laws have evolved significantly as family structures, the availability of reliable and inexpensive genetic testing, and assisted reproduction techniques have changed, the laws on parental and nonparental child support have not changed much. This article is the first to explore actual and potential child support arising from the new childcare opportunities for both de facto parents and nonparents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American University law review\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American University law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/rpx7w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American University law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/rpx7w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

长期以来,美国各州的法律都承认联邦宪法赋予的“照顾、监护和控制”孩子的权利,这一权利属于生育了孩子的异性夫妇或任何正式的养父母。最近,这种父母的权利也被承认为异性未婚夫妇生下的孩子。甚至在最近,美国各州的法律也承认了一些没有发生性行为导致孩子出生的父母的权利,以及一些孩子出生时没有发生性行为的父母的权利。州法律也越来越多地限制了这种育儿权,允许非父母不顾法定父母的反对,获得法院命令的育儿权,无论是通过新承认这些非父母为事实上的父母,还是作为具有育儿资格的第三方。随着家庭结构、可靠而廉价的基因检测和辅助生殖技术的变化,各州的儿童保育法发生了重大变化,但有关父母和非父母子女抚养费的法律却没有太大变化。这篇文章是第一个探讨实际的和潜在的儿童抚养费产生的新托儿机会为事实上的父母和非父母。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
De Facto Parent and Nonparent Child Support Orders
For ever so long U.S. state laws have recognized the federal constitutional right to “care, custody and control” of a child vested in the opposite sex married couple who bore the child of sex or in any formal adoptive parent. More recently this parental right has also been recognized for the opposite sex unmarried couple who bore the child of sex. And even more recently, U.S. state laws have recognized this parental right for some who did not engage in the sex leading to birth and for some where the children were born without sex. State laws have also increasingly limited this childcare right by allowing nonparents to secure court-ordered childcare over the objections of established legal parents, whether by newly recognizing these nonparents as de facto parents or as third parties with childcare standing. While state childcare laws have evolved significantly as family structures, the availability of reliable and inexpensive genetic testing, and assisted reproduction techniques have changed, the laws on parental and nonparental child support have not changed much. This article is the first to explore actual and potential child support arising from the new childcare opportunities for both de facto parents and nonparents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CHAPTER 2. Research Universities: Overextended, Underfocused; Overstressed, Underfunded The American University National Treasure or Endangered Species? CHAPTER 7. Prospect for the Social Sciences in the Land Grant University The American University: Dilemmas and Directions Frontmatter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1