Elias Cavalcante Filho, Fernando Moraes, Rodrigo De-Losso
{"title":"不熟练的基金经理:用很少的etf复制主动型基金的表现","authors":"Elias Cavalcante Filho, Fernando Moraes, Rodrigo De-Losso","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3634701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper use Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) instead of risk factors as benchmarks to examine active mutual fund performance distribution. While transaction costs are included in the ETF returns, that is not true regarding risk factors, making it more challenging to characterize extraordinary performances via alphas. Assessments are based on the proportion of skilled funds, defined as positive-alpha funds. Such a proportion is calculated taking into account potential false discoveries and employing the method devised by Barras et al. (2010). After evaluating several ETF combinations, we conclude that sets of 3 to 5 ETFs replicate most levels of active fund performance. Finally, we propose specific ETF selection algorithms, whereby we estimate that 95% of active management funds fail to generate value for their investors. Alphas calculated with ETFs are higher than those using risk factors, but the difference is similar to the transaction costs required for investing in risk factor portfolios (Frazzini et al., 2012).","PeriodicalId":57292,"journal":{"name":"公司治理评论","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unskilled Fund Managers: Replicating Active Fund Performance With Few ETFs\",\"authors\":\"Elias Cavalcante Filho, Fernando Moraes, Rodrigo De-Losso\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3634701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper use Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) instead of risk factors as benchmarks to examine active mutual fund performance distribution. While transaction costs are included in the ETF returns, that is not true regarding risk factors, making it more challenging to characterize extraordinary performances via alphas. Assessments are based on the proportion of skilled funds, defined as positive-alpha funds. Such a proportion is calculated taking into account potential false discoveries and employing the method devised by Barras et al. (2010). After evaluating several ETF combinations, we conclude that sets of 3 to 5 ETFs replicate most levels of active fund performance. Finally, we propose specific ETF selection algorithms, whereby we estimate that 95% of active management funds fail to generate value for their investors. Alphas calculated with ETFs are higher than those using risk factors, but the difference is similar to the transaction costs required for investing in risk factor portfolios (Frazzini et al., 2012).\",\"PeriodicalId\":57292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"公司治理评论\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"公司治理评论\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3634701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"公司治理评论","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3634701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
本文以交易所交易基金(etf)代替风险因素作为基准来考察主动共同基金的业绩分布。虽然交易成本包含在ETF回报中,但风险因素并非如此,这使得通过alpha来描述非凡表现更具挑战性。摊款是根据定义为正阿尔法基金的熟练基金的比例计算的。这一比例的计算考虑了潜在的错误发现,并采用了Barras等人(2010)设计的方法。在评估了几个ETF组合后,我们得出结论,3到5个ETF组合复制了大多数主动基金的业绩水平。最后,我们提出了具体的ETF选择算法,据此我们估计95%的主动管理基金未能为其投资者创造价值。使用etf计算的alpha值高于使用风险因素计算的alpha值,但差异与投资于风险因素组合所需的交易成本相似(Frazzini et al., 2012)。
Unskilled Fund Managers: Replicating Active Fund Performance With Few ETFs
This paper use Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) instead of risk factors as benchmarks to examine active mutual fund performance distribution. While transaction costs are included in the ETF returns, that is not true regarding risk factors, making it more challenging to characterize extraordinary performances via alphas. Assessments are based on the proportion of skilled funds, defined as positive-alpha funds. Such a proportion is calculated taking into account potential false discoveries and employing the method devised by Barras et al. (2010). After evaluating several ETF combinations, we conclude that sets of 3 to 5 ETFs replicate most levels of active fund performance. Finally, we propose specific ETF selection algorithms, whereby we estimate that 95% of active management funds fail to generate value for their investors. Alphas calculated with ETFs are higher than those using risk factors, but the difference is similar to the transaction costs required for investing in risk factor portfolios (Frazzini et al., 2012).