在一门完全在线的课程中,通过视频反馈来检验非传统研究生的体验

IF 6.4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Internet and Higher Education Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100858
Fatih Ari, Ismahan Arslan-Ari
{"title":"在一门完全在线的课程中,通过视频反馈来检验非传统研究生的体验","authors":"Fatih Ari,&nbsp;Ismahan Arslan-Ari","doi":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examined the effects of feedback type and treatment order on nontraditional graduate students' perceptions of instructor-provided feedback in a fully online instructional design course. The graduate students were provided with video feedback and text feedback for four interconnected instructional design document assignments. A mixed design was utilized with feedback type as within-subjects factor and treatment order as between-subjects factor. Further, an inductive analysis approach with open coding was used to analyze the data from open-response items. The quantitative results demonstrated that the interaction between feedback type and treatment order was significant for perceived learning, feedback quality, presentation format, and engagement with feedback. The qualitative findings revealed that the students in both groups acknowledged the value of receiving video and text feedback, and identified several benefits and drawbacks of working with each feedback type.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48186,"journal":{"name":"Internet and Higher Education","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 100858"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining nontraditional graduate students' experiences with video feedback in a fully online course\",\"authors\":\"Fatih Ari,&nbsp;Ismahan Arslan-Ari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study examined the effects of feedback type and treatment order on nontraditional graduate students' perceptions of instructor-provided feedback in a fully online instructional design course. The graduate students were provided with video feedback and text feedback for four interconnected instructional design document assignments. A mixed design was utilized with feedback type as within-subjects factor and treatment order as between-subjects factor. Further, an inductive analysis approach with open coding was used to analyze the data from open-response items. The quantitative results demonstrated that the interaction between feedback type and treatment order was significant for perceived learning, feedback quality, presentation format, and engagement with feedback. The qualitative findings revealed that the students in both groups acknowledged the value of receiving video and text feedback, and identified several benefits and drawbacks of working with each feedback type.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet and Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100858\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet and Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751622000148\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet and Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751622000148","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究考察了在全在线教学设计课程中,反馈类型和处理顺序对非传统研究生对教师提供的反馈感知的影响。针对四项相互关联的教学设计文件作业,为研究生提供视频和文字反馈。采用混合设计,反馈类型为受试者内因素,处理顺序为受试者间因素。在此基础上,采用开放编码的归纳分析方法对开放响应项目的数据进行分析。定量结果表明,反馈类型和处理顺序之间的交互作用对感知学习、反馈质量、演示格式和反馈参与有显著影响。定性调查结果显示,两组学生都承认接收视频和文本反馈的价值,并确定了使用每种反馈类型的一些优点和缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining nontraditional graduate students' experiences with video feedback in a fully online course

This study examined the effects of feedback type and treatment order on nontraditional graduate students' perceptions of instructor-provided feedback in a fully online instructional design course. The graduate students were provided with video feedback and text feedback for four interconnected instructional design document assignments. A mixed design was utilized with feedback type as within-subjects factor and treatment order as between-subjects factor. Further, an inductive analysis approach with open coding was used to analyze the data from open-response items. The quantitative results demonstrated that the interaction between feedback type and treatment order was significant for perceived learning, feedback quality, presentation format, and engagement with feedback. The qualitative findings revealed that the students in both groups acknowledged the value of receiving video and text feedback, and identified several benefits and drawbacks of working with each feedback type.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internet and Higher Education
Internet and Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
4.70%
发文量
30
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The Internet and Higher Education is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal focused on contemporary issues and future trends in online learning, teaching, and administration within post-secondary education. It welcomes contributions from diverse academic disciplines worldwide and provides a platform for theory papers, research studies, critical essays, editorials, reviews, case studies, and social commentary.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The paradox of self-efficacy and technological dependence: Unraveling generative AI's impact on university students' task completion Prior online learning experiences as incidental professional development: A cross-sectional survey of online instructor beliefs and strategies Interaction and dialogue: Integration and application of artificial intelligence in blended mode writing feedback A situated expectancy-value theoretical perspective of teaching presence and student engagement in blended learning environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1