中国信息系统研究:一个实证研究

IF 4.5 3区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Global Information Management Pub Date : 2007-01-01 DOI:10.4018/jgim.2007010101
Shaobo Ji, Qingfei Min, Weihe Han
{"title":"中国信息系统研究:一个实证研究","authors":"Shaobo Ji, Qingfei Min, Weihe Han","doi":"10.4018/jgim.2007010101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to develop an overview of information systems (IS) research in China in recent years and to identify the similarities and the differences between North American and Chinese IS research from four perspectives: reference discipline, research topics, research methods, and unit/level of analysis. A total of 604 research papers published in 18 leading Chinese academic journals from 1999 to 2003 were identified and reviewed. A categorization approach developed in previous studies was adopted to classify the IS research. The results show: 1) IS itself represented the major reference discipline used as the theoretical basis for the studies, and IS research in China does not demonstrate reliance on a single theory; 2) IS researchers in China have been clearly focused on organizational and system/software issues; 3) Non-Empirical Study was dominant in the field of IS research in China; 4) the majority of studies were conducted at the organization and system level. Group/team and individual level issues were not studied extensively.","PeriodicalId":46306,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Information Management","volume":"161 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information Systems Research in China: An Empirical Study\",\"authors\":\"Shaobo Ji, Qingfei Min, Weihe Han\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/jgim.2007010101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aims to develop an overview of information systems (IS) research in China in recent years and to identify the similarities and the differences between North American and Chinese IS research from four perspectives: reference discipline, research topics, research methods, and unit/level of analysis. A total of 604 research papers published in 18 leading Chinese academic journals from 1999 to 2003 were identified and reviewed. A categorization approach developed in previous studies was adopted to classify the IS research. The results show: 1) IS itself represented the major reference discipline used as the theoretical basis for the studies, and IS research in China does not demonstrate reliance on a single theory; 2) IS researchers in China have been clearly focused on organizational and system/software issues; 3) Non-Empirical Study was dominant in the field of IS research in China; 4) the majority of studies were conducted at the organization and system level. Group/team and individual level issues were not studied extensively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Information Management\",\"volume\":\"161 1\",\"pages\":\"13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Information Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2007010101\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2007010101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

本研究旨在概述近年来中国信息系统研究的概况,并从参考学科、研究主题、研究方法和分析单元/层次四个方面确定北美与中国信息系统研究的异同。对1999年至2003年在18种中国主要学术期刊上发表的604篇研究论文进行了鉴定和评审。采用以往研究中发展的分类方法对IS研究进行分类。研究结果表明:1)信息系统本身是研究的主要参考学科,中国的信息系统研究并不依赖于单一的理论;2)中国的信息系统研究人员明显关注组织和系统/软件问题;3)非实证研究在中国信息系统研究领域占主导地位;4)大多数研究是在组织和系统层面进行的。小组/团队和个人层面的问题没有得到广泛研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Information Systems Research in China: An Empirical Study
The study aims to develop an overview of information systems (IS) research in China in recent years and to identify the similarities and the differences between North American and Chinese IS research from four perspectives: reference discipline, research topics, research methods, and unit/level of analysis. A total of 604 research papers published in 18 leading Chinese academic journals from 1999 to 2003 were identified and reviewed. A categorization approach developed in previous studies was adopted to classify the IS research. The results show: 1) IS itself represented the major reference discipline used as the theoretical basis for the studies, and IS research in China does not demonstrate reliance on a single theory; 2) IS researchers in China have been clearly focused on organizational and system/software issues; 3) Non-Empirical Study was dominant in the field of IS research in China; 4) the majority of studies were conducted at the organization and system level. Group/team and individual level issues were not studied extensively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Information Management
Journal of Global Information Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that are consistent to the following submission themes: (a) Cross-National Studies. These need not be cross-culture per se. These studies lead to understanding of IT as it leaves one nation and is built/bought/used in another. Generally, these studies bring to light transferability issues and they challenge if practices in one nation transfer. (b) Cross-Cultural Studies. These need not be cross-nation. Cultures could be across regions that share a similar culture. They can also be within nations. These studies lead to understanding of IT as it leaves one culture and is built/bought/used in another. Generally, these studies bring to light transferability issues and they challenge if practices in one culture transfer.
期刊最新文献
Digital Supply Chain Management Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Supply Chain Management Using the ELM to Explore the Impact of Fake News on Panic Vaccination Intention Managing Carbon Efficiency and Carbon Equity The Effect of Information Resources Management in the UK on Financial Institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1