Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI:10.3176/ARCH.2016.2.02
Nina L. Morgunova, Mikhail A. Turetskij
{"title":"Archaeological and Natural Scientific Studies of Pit-Grave Culture Barrows in the Volga-Ural Interfluve/ Volga Ja Uurali Jogedevahelise Ala Aukhaudade (Jamnaja) Kultuuri Kaabaste Arheoloogilised Ning Loodusteaduslikud Uuringud","authors":"Nina L. Morgunova, Mikhail A. Turetskij","doi":"10.3176/ARCH.2016.2.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The Pit-Grave culture spread on huge territory of Eastern Europe steppe from Kazakhstan and south Ural to the Dniestr region. The eastern Pit-Grave artefacts were found in the Volga-Ural interfluve and in the south Ural region on the territory of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, and Orenburg oblasts, Russia. The environmental conditions of the steppe existed on the most part of the territory and forest steppe--in the north (Fig. 1). Today, natural conditions are determined by the continental climate, which corresponds to hot summers with low precipitation and severe winters with a lot of snow. The flora of watersheds is typical for the Volga sheep fescue-feather grass steppe (the type of steppe where sheep fescue and feather grass flourish). Various kinds of meadow grass, bushes, and streamside forests grow in river valleys and gulches. The paleoclimatic conditions of the Pit-Grave culture are different to the modem climate. Eneolithic and Pit-Grave culture existed in the favourable natural conditions practically all the time. The precipitation was 50 mm higher compared to the humidity today. The environmental conditions and temperature drops were milder than we had in past decades (Spiridonova & Aleshinskaya 1999; Khokhlova et al. 2006; 2010; Khokhlova 2012). Many scientists think that the climate change and the emergence of aridity period coincided with the start of the Late (Poltavka) stage of the Pit-Grave culture and the Catacomb culture spread to the west of Volga (Demkin et al. 2006; Shishlina 2007; Khokhlova et al. 2010; Khokhlova 2012). [FIGURE 1 OMITTED] V. V. Golmsten, P. S. Rykov, I. V. Sinitsyn, K. F. Smirnov, N. Ya. Merpert, V. P. Shilov, N. K. Kachalova, I. B. Vasilyev and other archaeologists studied the Pit-Grave sites in the Volga-Ural interfluve in the 20th century. During the Smirnov expedition the first Pit-Grave culture barrows (kurgans) were discovered at the end of the 1950s and beginning of the 1960s. Smirnov (1965) compared the Ural materials with the Lower Volga graves and found that there are skeletons in right lateral crouched position. After considering unique metal finds (a knife and a hammer) archaeologists came to the conclusion that during the Pit-Grave period an independent metallurgy center appeared on the base of the Kargala copper deposit (80-90 km to the north of Orenburg) in the south Ural region (Chernykh 1966, 68 f.). Later, at the end of the 20th century, the research by E. N. Chernykh proved the above-mentioned statement. This added the original character of the Ural group of the Pit-Grave culture and historical area (Chernykh 2002, 7 ff). At the beginning of the 1970s N. Ya. Merpert published the monograph, in which he summarized all the data concerning the Pit-Grave culture (Merpert 1974). The scholar singled out three local groups of sites within the Volga-Ural Pit-Grave cultural and historical area: the Ural, the Lower Volga, and the Middle Volga. Since 1977 the Pit-Grave research has been carried out under the guidance of N. L. Morgunova in the Orenburg oblast. She discovered diverse Pit-Grave complexes. In the second part of the 1980s the Pit-Grave culture research became well targeted and systematic. It resulted in considerable growth in the number of analysed Pit-Grave barrows (Morgunova & Kravtsov 1994). The first periodization of the Ural Pit-Grave culture was put forward. Scholars raised some questions concerning the economy and the structure of the Early Bronze Age society (Morgunova 1991). We formed the hypothesis of singling out the Middle Volga-Ural local type of the Pit-Grave culture (Turetskij 1999). Results of various kurgan studies in the area together with a lot of finds--various metal artefacts substantially changed the popular opinion that the Ural Pit-Grave culture had peripheral character. However, by the end of the 20th century it had become quite clear that the Pit-Grave sites were essential for applying new methods so that archaeologists could exploit new sources to find solutions for different complicated problems first of all the issues concerning the origin, the periodization and the chronology of the culture. …","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3176/ARCH.2016.2.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

深坑文化从哈萨克斯坦和乌拉尔南部传播到涅斯特地区,在东欧广阔的草原上传播。东部的坑冢人工制品是在伏尔加-乌拉尔断裂带和俄罗斯阿斯特拉罕、伏尔加格勒、萨拉托夫、萨马拉和奥伦堡州境内的乌拉尔南部地区发现的。草原的环境条件存在于大部分领土和森林草原-在北部(图1)。今天,自然条件是由大陆性气候决定的,对应于夏季炎热,降水少,冬季严寒,降雪多。流域的植物群是典型的伏尔加河羊茅-羽毛草草原(羊茅和羽毛草繁茂的草原类型)。各种各样的草甸草、灌木和溪边森林生长在河谷和沟壑中。坑冢文化的古气候条件与现代气候条件不同。新石器时代和坑冢文化几乎一直存在于有利的自然条件下。与今天的湿度相比,降雨量高出50毫米。环境条件和温度下降比过去几十年温和(Spiridonova & Aleshinskaya 1999;Khokhlova等人,2006;2010;抛开2012)。许多科学家认为,气候变化和干旱时期的出现与坑墓文化晚期(Poltavka)阶段的开始和Catacomb文化向伏尔加河以西传播是一致的(Demkin et al. 2006;Shishlina 2007;Khokhlova et al. 2010;抛开2012)。V. V. Golmsten, P. S. Rykov, I. V. Sinitsyn, K. F. Smirnov, N. Ya。Merpert, V. P. Shilov, N. K. Kachalova, I. B. Vasilyev和其他考古学家在20世纪研究了伏尔加河-乌拉尔断裂带的坑冢遗址。在斯米尔诺夫考察期间,第一个坑冢文化墓(kurgans)在20世纪50年代末和60年代初被发现。Smirnov(1965)将乌拉尔的材料与伏尔加河下游的坟墓进行了比较,发现有右侧蜷缩的骨骼。在考虑了独特的金属发现(一把刀和一把锤子)之后,考古学家得出结论,在坑墓时期,乌拉尔南部地区的Kargala铜矿(奥伦堡以北80-90公里)的底部出现了一个独立的冶金中心(Chernykh 1966, 68 f.)。后来,在20世纪末,E. N. Chernykh的研究证明了上述说法。这增加了Pit-Grave文化和历史区域乌拉尔群体的原始特征(Chernykh 2002, 7 ff)。20世纪70年代初,缅甸。Merpert发表了专著,其中他总结了有关Pit-Grave文化的所有数据(Merpert 1974)。这位学者在伏尔加-乌拉尔坑-坟墓文化和历史区域内挑选了三个当地的遗址群:乌拉尔、伏尔加河下游和伏尔加河中部。自1977年以来,在n.l. Morgunova的指导下,在奥伦堡州进行了pitt - grave研究。她发现了各种各样的坑冢复合体。在20世纪80年代的第二部分,对坑冢文化的研究变得更加有针对性和系统化。这导致被分析的坑冢冢数量有了相当大的增长(Morgunova & Kravtsov 1994)。提出了乌拉尔坑冢文化的第一个分期。学者们对早期青铜时代社会的经济和结构提出了一些问题(Morgunova 1991)。我们提出了挑出中伏尔加河-乌拉尔地区坑墓文化类型的假设(Turetskij 1999)。在该地区进行的各种库尔干研究的结果以及大量金属文物的发现,极大地改变了乌拉尔坑墓文化具有外围特征的普遍观点。然而,到20世纪末,人们已经相当清楚地认识到,深坑遗址对于应用新方法至关重要,这样考古学家就可以利用新的资源来找到解决各种复杂问题的办法,首先是关于文化的起源、分期和年表的问题。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Archaeological and Natural Scientific Studies of Pit-Grave Culture Barrows in the Volga-Ural Interfluve/ Volga Ja Uurali Jogedevahelise Ala Aukhaudade (Jamnaja) Kultuuri Kaabaste Arheoloogilised Ning Loodusteaduslikud Uuringud
Introduction The Pit-Grave culture spread on huge territory of Eastern Europe steppe from Kazakhstan and south Ural to the Dniestr region. The eastern Pit-Grave artefacts were found in the Volga-Ural interfluve and in the south Ural region on the territory of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, and Orenburg oblasts, Russia. The environmental conditions of the steppe existed on the most part of the territory and forest steppe--in the north (Fig. 1). Today, natural conditions are determined by the continental climate, which corresponds to hot summers with low precipitation and severe winters with a lot of snow. The flora of watersheds is typical for the Volga sheep fescue-feather grass steppe (the type of steppe where sheep fescue and feather grass flourish). Various kinds of meadow grass, bushes, and streamside forests grow in river valleys and gulches. The paleoclimatic conditions of the Pit-Grave culture are different to the modem climate. Eneolithic and Pit-Grave culture existed in the favourable natural conditions practically all the time. The precipitation was 50 mm higher compared to the humidity today. The environmental conditions and temperature drops were milder than we had in past decades (Spiridonova & Aleshinskaya 1999; Khokhlova et al. 2006; 2010; Khokhlova 2012). Many scientists think that the climate change and the emergence of aridity period coincided with the start of the Late (Poltavka) stage of the Pit-Grave culture and the Catacomb culture spread to the west of Volga (Demkin et al. 2006; Shishlina 2007; Khokhlova et al. 2010; Khokhlova 2012). [FIGURE 1 OMITTED] V. V. Golmsten, P. S. Rykov, I. V. Sinitsyn, K. F. Smirnov, N. Ya. Merpert, V. P. Shilov, N. K. Kachalova, I. B. Vasilyev and other archaeologists studied the Pit-Grave sites in the Volga-Ural interfluve in the 20th century. During the Smirnov expedition the first Pit-Grave culture barrows (kurgans) were discovered at the end of the 1950s and beginning of the 1960s. Smirnov (1965) compared the Ural materials with the Lower Volga graves and found that there are skeletons in right lateral crouched position. After considering unique metal finds (a knife and a hammer) archaeologists came to the conclusion that during the Pit-Grave period an independent metallurgy center appeared on the base of the Kargala copper deposit (80-90 km to the north of Orenburg) in the south Ural region (Chernykh 1966, 68 f.). Later, at the end of the 20th century, the research by E. N. Chernykh proved the above-mentioned statement. This added the original character of the Ural group of the Pit-Grave culture and historical area (Chernykh 2002, 7 ff). At the beginning of the 1970s N. Ya. Merpert published the monograph, in which he summarized all the data concerning the Pit-Grave culture (Merpert 1974). The scholar singled out three local groups of sites within the Volga-Ural Pit-Grave cultural and historical area: the Ural, the Lower Volga, and the Middle Volga. Since 1977 the Pit-Grave research has been carried out under the guidance of N. L. Morgunova in the Orenburg oblast. She discovered diverse Pit-Grave complexes. In the second part of the 1980s the Pit-Grave culture research became well targeted and systematic. It resulted in considerable growth in the number of analysed Pit-Grave barrows (Morgunova & Kravtsov 1994). The first periodization of the Ural Pit-Grave culture was put forward. Scholars raised some questions concerning the economy and the structure of the Early Bronze Age society (Morgunova 1991). We formed the hypothesis of singling out the Middle Volga-Ural local type of the Pit-Grave culture (Turetskij 1999). Results of various kurgan studies in the area together with a lot of finds--various metal artefacts substantially changed the popular opinion that the Ural Pit-Grave culture had peripheral character. However, by the end of the 20th century it had become quite clear that the Pit-Grave sites were essential for applying new methods so that archaeologists could exploit new sources to find solutions for different complicated problems first of all the issues concerning the origin, the periodization and the chronology of the culture. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1